Nanker Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 Now why would he plead the 5th? We all know that Trump is a Putin puppet because of the glorious gifts he received from the Rooskies in that Moscow hotel room. What does he have to hide? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Nanker said: Now why would he plead the 5th? We all know that Trump is a Putin puppet because of the glorious gifts he received from the Rooskies in that Moscow hotel room. What does he have to hide? Especially after willingly testifying twice before in open sessions... back when it was CERTAIN Trump was about to be ousted or exposed. Remember those days? Crickets from that crowd these days. No one is even talking about Mueller in the news. Why? Look at the last several news cycles: 1) Hurricane Florence for a solid week... then it became: 2) Kavanaugh confirmation protests... then it became: 3) Kavanaugh accusations/Dr. Ford hearings... then it (overnight) became: 4) Hurricane Michael (of which I have thoughts on its origin)... Mueller hasn't been on the front page or a subject of media talking heads for almost a month now. It's as if the media is trying hard to make people forget about the promises made. The outrageous claims (not backed by facts) which they pursued breathlessly just a few weeks ago. It's an (dis)information war first and foremost. That means manipulating the news cycle in an effort to manipulate the narrative. It's becoming harder and harder for even the most skeptical to deny there's a clear agenda.
Nanker Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Especially after willingly testifying twice before in open sessions... back when it was CERTAIN Trump was about to be ousted or exposed. Remember those days? Crickets from that crowd these days. No one is even talking about Mueller in the news. Why? Look at the last several news cycles: 1) Hurricane Florence for a solid week... then it became: 2) Kavanaugh confirmation protests... then it became: 3) Kavanaugh accusations/Dr. Ford hearings... then it (overnight) became: 4) Hurricane Michael (of which I have thoughts on its origin)... Mueller hasn't been on the front page or a subject of media talking heads for almost a month now. It's as if the media is trying hard to make people forget about the promises made. The outrageous claims (not backed by facts) which they pursued breathlessly just a few weeks ago. It's an (dis)information war first and foremost. That means manipulating the news cycle in an effort to manipulate the narrative. It's becoming harder and harder for even the most skeptical to deny there's a clear agenda. B.O. and Bill having a weekend smoker on a Caribbean island? 1
3rdnlng Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Especially after willingly testifying twice before in open sessions... back when it was CERTAIN Trump was about to be ousted or exposed. Remember those days? Crickets from that crowd these days. No one is even talking about Mueller in the news. Why? Look at the last several news cycles: 1) Hurricane Florence for a solid week... then it became: 2) Kavanaugh confirmation protests... then it became: 3) Kavanaugh accusations/Dr. Ford hearings... then it (overnight) became: 4) Hurricane Michael (of which I have thoughts on its origin)... Mueller hasn't been on the front page or a subject of media talking heads for almost a month now. It's as if the media is trying hard to make people forget about the promises made. The outrageous claims (not backed by facts) which they pursued breathlessly just a few weeks ago. It's an (dis)information war first and foremost. That means manipulating the news cycle in an effort to manipulate the narrative. It's becoming harder and harder for even the most skeptical to deny there's a clear agenda. You're forgetting the rock solid proof of collusion that Adam Schiff has seen. 3
Deranged Rhino Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Nanker said: B.O. and Bill having a weekend smoker on a Caribbean island? It's not the right thread for this kind of speculation, and I haven't dug deep enough into the numbers yet to really riff on it - but there are a lot of oddities about Michael (and the fact it was a direct, limited hit to Tyndall Air Force base - which has been serving an important role in black projects) that make me wonder if there weren't other factors at play besides Mother Nature. 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You're forgetting the rock solid proof of collusion that Adam Schiff has seen. True. Schiffty's been quiet these days. ***************************** Waiting for confirmation, but if this is actually being reported it's huge. The charge is true, by the way, whether or not it's being reported. Mifsud is a western intelligence asset, not a Russian asset. We covered that in depth pages ago:
Nanker Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 Not sure if this has been posted before. It's a long read, and likely nothing new to DR about Misfud. https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/26/the_maltese_phantom_of_russiagate_.html 1
4merper4mer Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 (edited) 38 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's not the right thread for this kind of speculation, and I haven't dug deep enough into the numbers yet to really riff on it - but there are a lot of oddities about Michael (and the fact it was a direct, limited hit to Tyndall Air Force base - which has been serving an important role in black projects) that make me wonder if there weren't other factors at play besides Mother Nature. I'd blame FRB's but they have been discovered to be Taylor and Kanye's competing get out the vote messages. Edited October 12, 2018 by 4merper4mer 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 If Misfud is truly a western intelligence operative - which he is - how does that change the story for those who've believed it from the start? Or do facts not matter anymore once you pass the second year marker of a disinformation campaign?
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: ***************************** Waiting for confirmation, but if this is actually being reported it's huge. The charge is true, by the way, whether or not it's being reported. Mifsud is a western intelligence asset, not a Russian asset. We covered that in depth pages ago: He's been dripping out stuff "first" for a few weeks now. Almost like this whole process pissed him off, and he knows a lot more than people are giving him credit for... 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: He's been dripping out stuff "first" for a few weeks now. Almost like this whole process pissed him off, and he knows a lot more than people are giving him credit for... He's also angling for a pardon imo. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills lost/gave up their security clearance.Hillary Clinton lost security clearance
Dr. Who Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills lost/gave up their security clearance.Hillary Clinton lost security clearance If you can't be civil, you can't have a security clearance. 1
DC Tom Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills lost/gave up their security clearance.Hillary Clinton lost security clearance Irrelevant. She still gets access to classified info as a former First Lady.
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Irrelevant. She still gets access to classified info as a former First Lady. Yes. How much are former first presidents (so former first ladies as a degree of separation) given access to? And, how long is that relevant? (For instance, I think Obama would have more access than Carter, but what do I know?)
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 This is well worth the read. It really ties all the players and timelines together:Spygate: The True Story of CollusionHow America’s most powerful agencies were weaponized against President Donald Trump 1
/dev/null Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Irrelevant. She still gets access to classified info as a former First Lady. I can understand a former Secretary of State being given access to classified information. But why exactly does the First Lady has a Security Clearance? And why do former FLOTUS need access to classified info?
Nanker Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 So she ca n keep tabs on her cheating husband.
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 12, 2018 Posted October 12, 2018 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills lost/gave up their security clearance.Hillary Clinton lost security clearance this tweet has more links...
Recommended Posts