Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

Not for corrupt purposes 

 

Just block that snowflake already. You get his opinions anyway through one of the other 5 user names he spouts his crap on here with.

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, word has it that Gary may be a sexual predator. He has yet to prove he is not, so it appears that, by the laws of #metoo, the allegations stand and he is guilty.

a bit of a tangent here...

 

does anyone else find it particularily ironic that a womens right movement has the tag, PoundMeToo? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

Ken Dilianian was already outted as a CIA mouthpiece... yet Gary keeps using him as a source? 

 

Is it because Gary is just uninformed, or is it because he just doesn't care about honesty? 

 

A mystery that will ring through time...

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Only someone with something to hide thinks "transparency" is a corrupting force. 

 

You're terrible at this. 

 

Yes, Putin and the rest of the global murder mill would love it if our intelligence community was more transparent. You are great at this. ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Foxx said:

a bit of a tangent here...

 

does anyone else find it particularily ironic that a womens right movement has the tag, PoundMeToo? 

 

They're recruited for being a victim, not for being terribly bright.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Ken Dilianian was already outted as a CIA mouthpiece... yet Gary keeps using him as a source? 

 

Is it because Gary is just uninformed, or is it because he just doesn't care about honesty? 

 

A mystery that will ring through time...

 

It can't be both?

Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

It can't be both?

 

It can be. But that's asking a lot from such a small mind as the one atop Gary's shoulders. If he holds more than one thought at once in his head, I fear it might short circuit. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's a magnificent display of political squirming, ain't it? 

 

Warner is one of the more fukked people on the SSCI. 

 

POTUS can declass anything he wishes, whenever he wishes. 

 

Clinton was not, and will never be, POTUS. Thus, your comparison only serves to highlight how uninformed you actually are. 

Honestly, as he gets more than traction for his position (fairly or unfairly) he makes less sense.  

 

Tibs: Hey, how come one guy can go to the bank and take money out and no one says anything, but then another guy goes in with a note and a gun and the cops are like going crazy with "its armed robbery". 

Posted
20 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Corrupt openness?  

 

In a world where "double dumbass pork chop on you" is an acceptable lefty retort, why not corrupt transparency?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

The video at the top is worth the watch as well. 

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/407335-exclusive-trump-says-exposing-corrupt-fbi-probe-could-be-crowning-achievement

 

President Trump in an exclusive interview with Hill.TV said Tuesday he ordered the release of classified documents in the Russia collusion case to show the public the FBI probe started as a “hoax,” and that exposing it could become one of the “crowning achievements” of his presidency.

 

“What we’ve done is a great service to the country, really,” Trump said in a 45-minute, wide-ranging interview in the Oval Office.

“I hope to be able to call this, along with tax cuts and regulation and all the things I’ve done… in its own way this might be the most important thing because this was corrupt,” he said.

Posted

 

While Schiff is notorious for hyperbole, his assertion of a “red line” is rather stunning.  Does it mean Rosenstein and Wray will defy the president’s direct order and continue to obstruct lawful subpoenas issued by congress?  If so, they should be fired for rank insubordination. 

In the alternative, they may endeavor to delay or “slow roll” the release of documents hoping that the political winds may shift or that control of Congress itself will change hands in the upcoming election. 

 

Rosenstein has every reason to suppress the records. They may incriminate him. He affixed his signature to the final renewal of the FISA warrant application to continue spying on Carter Page.  He vouched for the authenticity and veracity of the information contained therein.  But if it was largely based on a “dossier” that was unverified and uncorroborated, Rosenstein may have been complicit in misusing his position of power in pursuit of a president who was wrongfully targeted by the FBI and DOJ. 

 

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/09/18/gregg-jarrett-if-rod-rosenstein-defies-trumps-order-to-declassify-documents-should-be-fired.html

×
×
  • Create New...