row_33 Posted October 20, 2017 Posted October 20, 2017 back in the day before criminal rights entered, we'd have warrants with total fishing expedition rights on anything we could get our hands on then they forced us to have to itemize what we were generally looking for based on the actual colour of right for suspicion less fun. Mueller has nothing to even begin with.
DC Tom Posted October 20, 2017 Posted October 20, 2017 Agree or disagree with it, that's a really good comic either way.
boyst Posted October 20, 2017 Posted October 20, 2017 Agree or disagree with it, that's a really good comic either way. it's a fact that it's a lie. https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
MakeBuffaloGreatAgain Posted October 21, 2017 Posted October 21, 2017 It's funny how the Dems only cared about Russia when they go blind sided by Trump winning. Before that time, they loved them some Russian dealings. If they could have made us the USSR 2.0, they would have. Hopefully Odumbo and Killary find some jail time for this. She should already have been behind bars for Benghazi and murdering that guy leaking info to Wikileaks.
B-Man Posted October 21, 2017 Posted October 21, 2017 Mueller team criticized by fellow attorneys for history of questionable tactics. Also, he’s hopelessly compromised by his relationships with Comey, the Clintons, and the Uranium One scandal.
row_33 Posted October 21, 2017 Posted October 21, 2017 Theres that phony look she gives at the right moment, but the cameras are always rolling when she has that sour Grinch expression the rest of the time.
/dev/null Posted October 21, 2017 Posted October 21, 2017 Mueller team criticized by fellow attorneys for history of questionable tactics. Also, he’s hopelessly compromised by his relationships with Comey, the Clintons, and the Uranium One scandal. Theres that phony look she gives at the right moment, but the cameras are always rolling when she has that sour Grinch expression the rest of the time. And that phony look reminds me of
B-Man Posted October 23, 2017 Posted October 23, 2017 NBC News: Democrat lobbyist Tony Podesta is now a subject in the investigation being led by Robert Mueller: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/amp/mueller-now-investigating-democratic-lobbyist-tony-podesta-n812776 …
row_33 Posted October 23, 2017 Posted October 23, 2017 She also does that phony face when walking in front of a crowd and making a big phony pointing at nobody in particular in the crowd.
Alaska Darin Posted October 24, 2017 Posted October 24, 2017 it's a fact that it's a lie. https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/Absence of proof doesn't mean that, no matter how hard Snopes tries.
boyst Posted October 24, 2017 Posted October 24, 2017 Absence of proof doesn't mean that, no matter how hard Snopes tries.I am just getting a kick out of Snopes now. In news.google which is great for local news and non national news + due to bias - is often sourced. According to them Benghazi to Niger = undetermined
Deranged Rhino Posted October 24, 2017 Posted October 24, 2017 I am just getting a kick out of Snopes now. Snopes is a proven disinformation outlet. Look into who owns it.
B-Man Posted October 24, 2017 Posted October 24, 2017 Lynch, the Clintons and a series of fantastic coincidences by Greg Jarrett Original Article I don’t believe in coincidences. Not when it comes to crimes. Especially when they involve political corruption. No such thing as a coincidence. Doesn’t exist. Yet, we are led to believe it was merely a coincidence that Bill Clinton just happened to be on the tarmac of an Arizona airport at the same time as then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch. We are supposed to accept that their private meeting on board Lynch’s plane had nothing whatsoever to do with the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton which the A-G was overseeing at the time. Right. They just “schmoozed” about grandkids and what-not. I guess it was also just a coincidence that a few days after the furtive tarmac meeting the decision was announced that criminal charges against Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, would not be filed, notwithstanding compelling evidence that she repeatedly violated the Espionage Act by storing highly classified documents on her private, unauthorized and unsecured email server in the basement of her home. Sure. Makes perfect sense. To a naïve, gullible fool. Maybe it was purely a coincidence that there was another FBI investigation going on involving Russia’s corruption-fueled purchase of U.S uranium assets and which also happened to implicate the Clintons, but was kept hidden from Congress and the American people by Lynch and her predecessor, Eric Holder. Hmm… And perhaps it was simply an odd coincidence that the investigation of this uranium bribery, extortion, money laundering and kickback case was supervised by then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, his successor James Comey, and then-U.S Attorney Rod Rosenstein, all of whom appear to have covered it up but are now directly involved in the Trump-Russia probe. Strange confluence of people and events, eh? I don’t buy any of it. Not for one minute. And not entirely because I don’t believe in coincidences. It is because all the above-mentioned people are known to trifle with the law or ignore disqualifying conflicts of interest. They seem to be without principles --devoid of the kind of scruples that should guide people in service of our government. Mueller is serving as special counsel in the Trump-Russia case. He reports to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who appointed him. Yet both Rosenstein and fired FBI Director James Comey are witnesses in the case, since Rosenstein recommended to President Trump that Comey be fired. It is well established that Comey and Mueller are long-time friends, allies and former partners. How can Mueller be fair and impartial given these glaring conflicts of interest? He cannot. And he should recuse himself. Rosenstein should also step aside in overseeing the case. He cannot be prosecutor and witness simultaneously. Their conflicts are compounded by recent reports that all three men were involved in the Russian uranium case which was kept hidden from Congress. How can Americans have confidence in the outcome of the Trump-Russia case if they engaged in a cover-up of the Clinton-Russia case? MORE AT THE LINK :
row_33 Posted October 24, 2017 Posted October 24, 2017 another month has passed since i asked: ANYTHING YET????
OCinBuffalo Posted October 25, 2017 Posted October 25, 2017 (edited) it's a fact that it's a lie. https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ I like how they "updated" that analysis, all the way down at the bottom, with exactly what doesn't make it false, but they have yet to remove the "false" icon. At the very least it deserves a "plausible", or whatever their ranking for that is. It doesn't matter, given what we know now, they're going to have to revisit this entire thing, period. Or, just give us a 404 error in a month: "this is not the page you are looking for". Edited October 25, 2017 by OCinBuffalo
row_33 Posted October 26, 2017 Posted October 26, 2017 Many calling for Mueller to recuse, I would be fine if he would just plain FOAD.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 28, 2017 Author Posted October 28, 2017 First Charges Being Filed: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/politics/first-charges-mueller-investigation/index.html
boyst Posted October 28, 2017 Posted October 28, 2017 First Charges Being Filed: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/politics/first-charges-mueller-investigation/index.htmlI bet your panties are damp as hell.
Recommended Posts