boyst Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 Sooo. If there was nothing to prosecute 11 years ago why is there now, you dingbat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 In that year, 2006, Manafort signed a deal to help Putin, its a $10 million deal! To buy the 2016 election? What forethought he had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 To buy the 2016 election? What forethought he had. No, to help rape the country of Ukraine. After that orgy of corruption the gang was kicked out and ran to Russia and Putin who had another job for them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 To buy the 2016 election? What forethought he had. Trump's collusion runs deep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 Andrew McCarthy devotes his weekly NRO column to the unlimited mandate and prosecutorial tactics of Robert Mueller. The column is “Mueller scorches the earth.”Reviewing the proceedings to date, McCarthy writes: You are forgiven if you can recall only vaguely that supposition about Trump-campaign collusion in Russian espionage against the 2016 election was the actual explanation for Mueller’s appointment as special counsel. To the extent there was any explanation, that is. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, a Trump appointee, did not comply with the regulations requiring a description of the crimes Trump’s Justice Department is too conflicted to investigate, purportedly necessitating a quasi-independent special counsel. The way it’s supposed to work, the Justice Department learns of a crime, so it assigns a prosecutor. To the contrary, this Justice Department assigned a prosecutor — make that: Seventeen hyper-aggressive prosecutors — and unleashed them to hunt for whatever crime they could find. If you sense that this cuts against the presumption of innocence, you’re onto something…. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 Lol at the sight of wingnuts upset about the scope of a special prosecutor's investigation. What, are you worried that the Idiot in Chief might be entrapped to lie about a BJ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 Lol at the sight of wingnuts upset about the scope of a special prosecutor's investigation. What, are you worried that the Idiot in Chief might be entrapped to lie about a BJ? To be fair, a lot of them didn't want a special prosecutor appointed specifically because they were aware of the "fishing expedition" precedent they set with Clinton... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 Jared Kushner was using a private email account? Lock him up? http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-account-nr.cnn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Jared Kushner was using a private email account? Lock him up? http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-account-nr.cnn Yeah, but he didn't intend to, so it should be dropped and you're an anti-semite for bringing it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Any updates on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Any updates on this? I thought they were trying to collect data from about 6 Trumpsters using Private Servers to send official emails about and the firing of Mueller is still looming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 How do we go back to Mueller after treating football players like there protest is the most significant event in human history and all eternity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 How do we go back to Mueller after treating football players like there protest is the most significant event in human history and all eternity? The distraction of the Century...of the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein was the beneficiary of at least one of the Russian-bought political ads on Facebook that federal government officials suspect were intended to influence the 2016 election. Other advertisements paid for by shadowy Russian buyers criticized Hillary Clinton and promoted Donald Trump. Some backed Bernie Sanders and his platform even after his presidential campaign had ended, according to a person with knowledge of the ads. The pro-Stein ad came late in the political campaign and pushed her candidacy for president, this person said. “Choose peace and vote for Jill Stein,” the ad reads. “Trust me. It’s not a wasted vote. … The only way to take our country back is to stop voting for the corporations and banks that own us. #GrowaSpineVoteJillStein.” The ads show a complicated effort that didn’t necessarily hew to promoting Trump and bashing Clinton. Instead, they show a desire to create divisions while sometimes praising Trump, Sanders and Stein. A number of the ads seemed to question Clinton’s authenticity and tout some of the liberal criticisms of her candidacy. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/26/facebook-russia-trump-sanders-stein-243172 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 Neither Robert Mueller’s team nor the US Senate Intelligence Committee has bothered to contact WikiLeaks or me, in any manner, ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 OBAMA HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY JEH JOHNSON: The 2016 election wasn’t hacked. So what’s Robert Mueller investigating again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 OBAMA HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY JEH JOHNSON: The 2016 election wasn’t hacked. So what’s Robert Mueller investigating again? He's repping the people who are always resentful and bitter about people doing better than they are. If they tried even 2% of their potential they would be able to achieve things as well. Oh well.... maybe they will reincarnate into something wiser next go round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 OBAMA HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY JEH JOHNSON: The 2016 election wasn’t hacked. So what’s Robert Mueller investigating again? * Obstruction of Justice * Collusion * Whether the President is compromised * All the many, many lies that have been told * Are you really so stupid and uninformed you actually have to ask? (Yes you are) He's repping the people who are always resentful and bitter about people doing better than they are. If they tried even 2% of their potential they would be able to achieve things as well. Oh well.... maybe they will reincarnate into something wiser next go round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 * All the many, many lies that have been told He is investigating you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 He is investigating you? What lies have I told? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts