DC Tom Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Forget Russian meddling, this is a sitting POTUS spying on his opposition in order to influence the election. That's as bad as it gets. Or should be. You know...for all the effort he put in to influencing the election, Obama was really, really bad at it... 2
Deranged Rhino Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: You know...for all the effort he put in to influencing the election, Obama was really, really bad at it... All thanks to this guy: If he hadn't acted when he did, exposed what he exposed, we'd never know any of this and we'd likely have either an HRC presidency right now or a Mike Pence presidency. 1
3rdnlng Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 37 minutes ago, DC Tom said: You know...for all the effort he put in to influencing the election, Obama was really, really bad at it... Why would that surprise you? I can remember posting about the ACA when it was coming down. I said something along the lines of "I am opposed philosophically with the premise of the ACA but even more opposed with the people implementing it. They are incompetent and can never make it work".
Deranged Rhino Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 Guess who said this Monday (or in an interview published Monday): Just to make sure I understand: You were saying that impeachment was “off the table” in relation to Bush? Or with Trump?Even with Trump. If you got something, show it. But I’m not going after it. What we’re going after is the economic security of America’s working families. (obscuring the link since it gives it away) https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/nancy-pelosi-interview-696750/?stream=top (If she's saying that while worried about elections in California (and nationally) then you know it's over. If there was anything besides smoke, she'd be running on it as would the entire party. The next phase of this thing is going to be bumpy.
Nanker Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 I’ll take “Things Stretch Pelosi says in an increasingly rare moment of sobriety and coherency” for $500, Alex. 1
3rdnlng Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Guess who said this Monday (or in an interview published Monday): Just to make sure I understand: You were saying that impeachment was “off the table” in relation to Bush? Or with Trump?Even with Trump. If you got something, show it. But I’m not going after it. What we’re going after is the economic security of America’s working families. (obscuring the link since it gives it away) https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/nancy-pelosi-interview-696750/?stream=top (If she's saying that while worried about elections in California (and nationally) then you know it's over. If there was anything besides smoke, she'd be running on it as would the entire party. The next phase of this thing is going to be bumpy. At first I was sure it was Nancy Pelosi but that's not the way she talks. This is more like it: Even with Bush Trump. If you got...………………………………………………………….. something, something, uh...……………………………………. show it. But I’m not going after...……………………………………….. it. What we’re going after is the, the the...……………………………. economic Uh...…………..security of America’s...…………………………………………………. working uh...........................….families. 1
DC Tom Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 16 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Guess who said this Monday (or in an interview published Monday): Just to make sure I understand: You were saying that impeachment was “off the table” in relation to Bush? Or with Trump?Even with Trump. If you got something, show it. But I’m not going after it. What we’re going after is the economic security of America’s working families. (obscuring the link since it gives it away) https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/nancy-pelosi-interview-696750/?stream=top (If she's saying that while worried about elections in California (and nationally) then you know it's over. If there was anything besides smoke, she'd be running on it as would the entire party. The next phase of this thing is going to be bumpy. Definitely Pelosi. Only she's stupid enough to say **** like "What we’re going after is the economic security of America’s working families." Because if I'm a Republican, I'm running that quote all day, every day, within the context of "Democrats want to take away your economic security." Pelosi is a moron. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 3 different versions of the dossier to the FBI, after being "laundered" through different outlets. One each from: Steele (This was the June dossier authored by Simpson/Ohr) David Corn (this was likely the October dossier) John McCain (this was the buzzfeed dossier) Each "different" dossier shares a common source: Fusion GPS and the FBI-Counter Intelligence Division/DOJ-National Security Division. http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/396307-Did-FBI-get-bamboozled-by-multiple-versions-of-Trump-dossier%3F ****************************************** And breaking today as this story drops: Lisa Page refuses to appear tomorrow to testify before Congress. Here's the full statement from her attorney: 1
Golden Goat Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: 3 different versions of the dossier to the FBI, after being "laundered" through different outlets. One each from: Steele (This was the June dossier authored by Simpson/Ohr) David Corn (this was likely the October dossier) John McCain (this was the buzzfeed dossier) Each "different" dossier shares a common source: Fusion GPS and the FBI-Counter Intelligence Division/DOJ-National Security Division. http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/396307-Did-FBI-get-bamboozled-by-multiple-versions-of-Trump-dossier%3F ****************************************** And breaking today as this story drops: Lisa Page refuses to appear tomorrow to testify before Congress. Here's the full statement from her attorney: My guess is she will eventually testify -- She just wants Strzok to go first. He's a more accomplished liar, and she'll learn a lot from him. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Goodlatte is one of the few who knows the full plan (imo). This is bad news for Lisa.
njbuff Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 33 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Goodlatte is one of the few who knows the full plan (imo). This is bad news for Lisa. Don’t you basically bury yourself if you don’t comply with a congressional supena? 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 2 hours ago, njbuff said: Don’t you basically bury yourself if you don’t comply with a congressional supena? Bold move cotton
4merper4mer Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 5 hours ago, njbuff said: Don’t you basically bury yourself if you don’t comply with a congressional supena? Lol.
Tiberius Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 6 hours ago, Golden Goat said: My guess is she will eventually testify -- She just wants Strzok to go first. He's a more accomplished liar, and she'll learn a lot from him. Speaking of liars, Will Trump testify? He is such a kitty
keepthefaith Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 7 hours ago, njbuff said: Don’t you basically bury yourself if you don’t comply with a congressional supena? For every legal maneuver there is an equal and opposite legal maneuver. In this day and age, court orders, supoena's and judgements often don't have a lot of teeth. Expect this investigation and any prosecutions that might ensue to go on literally for years. Lawyers love a slow moving process that generates a lot of fees, especially if it benefits their client. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 (edited) ******************************* More on this: http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/396307-Did-FBI-get-bamboozled-by-multiple-versions-of-Trump-dossier%3F Solomon obtained an email sent by Strzok on January 10th, 2017 - the day of the Buzzfeed publication of the dossier. It shows Strzok comparing the dossier from Buzzfeed to the one Glenn Simpson gave to the FBI (Corn's dossier) Of course, this conflicts DIRECTLY with testimony from Glenn Simpson, who denied ever giving ANY dossier to the FBI: Watch: (now remember when the charges against Jordan came out... right after this contentious exchange) Think this might come up in Strzok's testimony tomorrow? Edited July 11, 2018 by Deranged Rhino
Deranged Rhino Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 (edited) Corn already trying to play defense on that. But he's got a losing hand... (remember, he published portions of the dossier in OCTOBER and already testified he informed the FBI of the dossier in Sept/Oct) Here's more Simpson testimony denying it: 1) 2) 3) Edited July 11, 2018 by Deranged Rhino
Deranged Rhino Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Shocking! David Corn is getting walloped on Twitter now for the OBVIOUS lie 1
Recommended Posts