Tiberius Posted June 20, 2018 Posted June 20, 2018 The real funny thing is Trump admitted the Hillary criminal angel was just for the election. But oh well...
3rdnlng Posted June 20, 2018 Posted June 20, 2018 18 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The real funny thing is Trump admitted the Hillary criminal angel was just for the election. But oh well... Yes, Michael was pretty bad.
outsidethebox Posted June 20, 2018 Posted June 20, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Yes, Michael was pretty bad. I loved that movie!!! What's her name was pretty hot in it!? 1
3rdnlng Posted June 20, 2018 Posted June 20, 2018 23 minutes ago, westside said: I loved that movie!!! What's her name was pretty hot in it!? Andie McDowell 1
outsidethebox Posted June 20, 2018 Posted June 20, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Andie McDowell Yes!!!!!! Thanks 3rd!!!!!
B-Man Posted June 21, 2018 Posted June 21, 2018 Republicans being assertive? Who knew? DOJ turns over docs to House Intelligence following explicit threats by Republicans by Kelly Cohen & Daniel Chaitin Original Article . 2
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Posted June 21, 2018 Oh, but there is an explanation, Ken. It's called organizing a frame up - and it began in earnest in April of 2016 after Mike Rogers shut down the DOJ-NSD and FBI-CID's access to raw 702 NSA data. It's the same reason 44 expelled diplomats in late December - setting the hook in the narrative. That was quickly followed by a bogus ICA report, authored by Clapper, Brennan, and Strzok along with a small, hand picked team of analysts (in direct violation of protocols enacted after the WMD debacle in 2003). She was never supposed to lose. And when she did, the whole operation was left exposed, leaving the traitors only one option: execute a palace coup in order to cover their asses. 500+ pages of evidence now in record to support this. Lots of pain ahead for the likes of McCabe, Strzok, Comey, Brennan, Clapper and the whole lot of snakes.
row_33 Posted June 21, 2018 Posted June 21, 2018 Why would they risk everything for HER? they couldn’t Vince Foster everyone in the conspiracy
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Posted June 21, 2018 Just now, row_33 said: Why would they risk everything for HER? they couldn’t Vince Foster everyone in the conspiracy Because it was bigger than just her. It was also about preserving 44's legacy. (but it was mainly about the people behind them both)
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Posted June 21, 2018 (Hint: criminal charges in the pipeline) So when it's revealed Strzok wrote the 302 for the Flynn interview, things are going to get REALLY interesting. Doubly so when it's revealed he edited the 302 after the fact, with McCabe and Page's approval... This was the day before Flynn was interviewed in the WH: "I can feel my heart beating harder, I'm so stressed about all the ways this has the potential to go fully off the rails." NOTHING TO SEE THERE! Then, here are the two discussing something about 302's and needing Andy's (McCabe) approval: The "F" in 302 might refer to Flynn. But even if it doesn't, it's NOT protocol or normal for Page and Strzok to need any sort of approval on a 302 from McCabe. The chances that they are talking about something criminal here is high. This may well turn out to be a smoking gun when the next reports drop... Fruit from the poisonous tree is just the start. Get ready for the fun. 1
Tiberius Posted June 22, 2018 Posted June 22, 2018 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-mugs-trump-critic-tom-arnold-n885611 Quote President Donald Trump's embattled personal attorney, Michael Cohen, retweeted a photo of himself with comedian Tom Arnold — who happens to be working on a show with Vice that features him hunting for unflattering video of Trump. Arnold told NBC News early Friday that Cohen ― who is under investigation by federal prosecutors ― talked to him for the show, which is expected to air later this year. "We’ve been on the other side of the table and now we’re on the same side," said Arnold, an outspoken Trump critic. "It’s on! I hope he [Trump] sees the picture of me and Michael Cohen and it haunts his dreams." I love New York pic.twitter.com/J7AJg1HiHo — Tom Arnold (@TomArnold) June 22, 2018 It was Arnold — who is Trump fan Roseanne Barr's ex-husband — who posted the photo Thursday night with the caption "I Love New York." Cohen then retweeted it without comment. NBC News asked Cohen about the photo and he referred inquiries to Arnold. Several hours later, Arnold contacted NBC News. He said he was in New York taping interviews for the Vice show and that he and Cohen met at the Loews Regency Hotel in Manhattan.
Deranged Rhino Posted June 22, 2018 Posted June 22, 2018 Mueller looks as if he is preparing to hand off the Concord case (the only one that involves Russians and the 2016 election directly) to departments NOT involved with the SC --because it's a losing case: (more at the link)
Deranged Rhino Posted June 22, 2018 Posted June 22, 2018 INTERESTING... It's almost like something that's been said down here for going on a year now... 1
njbuff Posted June 23, 2018 Posted June 23, 2018 What is Rosenstein trying to hide that he has this war with the GOP on handing over the documents? 1
B-Man Posted June 24, 2018 Posted June 24, 2018 WELL, THIS IS GOING SWIMMINGLY: Facing humiliation, Mueller backs away from prosecution of Russian entities. 1
Nanker Posted June 24, 2018 Posted June 24, 2018 49 minutes ago, B-Man said: WELL, THIS IS GOING SWIMMINGLY: Facing humiliation, Mueller backs away from prosecution of Russian entities. Hahahahahahaha Mueller simply won’t allow the Defense to see what “evidence” he has on the Rooskies because there isn’t any. Great move by the Defense - to go to court and demand a speedy trial. Caught Mueller completely off guard in this sham of an investigation that only seeks inflammatory headlines that are biased against the POTUS. 3
Recommended Posts