Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 The projection is OFF THE CHARTS by those most seriously addled with TDS brains. They don't even hide it.
Logic Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They've been clinging to one narrative for so long - despite there being no evidence to support it, just the affirmations from their echo chambers led by known liars (whose records are ignored) - that they can't turn back now. I've tried for over a year to provide a ladder to climb out of the disinformation cloud. Some took it, others burned it because their pride and ego are more important than truth. Some people are going to have a tougher time than others with what's to come. A Trump supporter talking about trying to help OTHER PEOPLE "climb out of the disinformation cloud". Now I've heard everything. ?
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 Just now, Logic said: A Trump supporter talking about trying to help OTHER PEOPLE "climb out of the disinformation cloud". Now I've heard everything. ? Not a Trump supporter. Sorry. Voted for Tulsi Gabbard. Again, the projection is OFF THE CHARTS by those who are just too dug into their positions, too ruled by their own ego to even consider the fact that they've been lied to - by known liars and proven perjurers - for over two years. 1 minute ago, Logic said: A Trump supporter talking about trying to help OTHER PEOPLE "climb out of the disinformation cloud". Now I've heard everything. ? Let's test your "independent" knowledge. Who's Robert Hannigan and how does he factor into this thread?
DC Tom Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: They've been clinging to one narrative for so long - despite there being no evidence to support it, just the affirmations from their echo chambers led by known liars (whose records are ignored) - that they can't turn back now. I've tried for over a year to provide a ladder to climb out of the disinformation cloud. Some took it, others burned it because their pride and ego are more important than truth. Some people are going to have a tougher time than others with what's to come. It's not that it's clinging to the narrative, so much as it's clinging to every narrative, in grabasstic, incoherent fashion. It actually links nepotism with preexisting condition coverage. That is insanely dumb. It's like a warped Chewbacca defense on crystal meth. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: It's not that it's clinging to the narrative, so much as it's clinging to every narrative, in grabasstic, incoherent fashion. It actually links nepotism with preexisting condition coverage. That is insanely dumb. It's like a warped Chewbacca defense on crystal meth. (just been looking for a reason to use this one ) 1
Logic Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not a Trump supporter. Sorry. Voted for Tulsi Gabbard. Again, the projection is OFF THE CHARTS by those who are just too dug into their positions, too ruled by their own ego to even consider the fact that they've been lied to - by known liars and proven perjurers - for over two years. Surely, with that statement, you're talking about Trump supporters. Never has a group of people been so dug in, so unwilling to admit that they made a terrible mistake, so dismissive of facts and so enabling and accepting of an obviously unfit ruler. I understood why people voted for Trump. I do not, however, understand how people can still support him, having seen how clearly unfit he has proven to be for the job. Every damn line of Shaub's post is spot-on. Do you mean to tell me that you don't believe Trump is alienating our allies with his recent actions? You don't believe he and his family are accepting emoluments and profiting hugely and illegally during his presidency? You don't think he does everything possible to subvert the justice system? You don't think it's at all suspicious that his responses to the Mueller investigation have ranged from obfuscation to outright lies to wanting to investigate the investigators? You don't think it's strange and wrong that Trump is friendlier to autocrats than to our allies? You don't think that, if Obama had had the past 2 years that Trump has had -- even the past WEEK Trump has had, the GOP would be demanding impeachment? I realize that the PPP is just an endless cycle of the same 5 or 6 guys going at each other over and over again. I realize that, indeed, we live in an era in which most people DO exist in echo chambers and ARE stubbornly entrenched in their positions. Nevertheless, I find that everything Shaub said -- while at times stated in dramatic language -- is right on the money. I feel that our democracy is being challenged and endangered by a morally bankrupt and emotionally fragile egoist whose only goals are his own enrichment, and a Congress that seems to have zero problems enabling him to do so. Obviously, you'll call me over-dramatic and whatever else you can think of, but anyone who can look at the events of this presidency to date with clear eyes and NOT see the danger that this man poses is being willfully, stubbornly dug in on their position, just as you accuse the opposition of being. 1
Cinga Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 40 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/12/rosenstein-threatened-to-subpoena-gop-led-committee-in-chilling-clash-over-records-emails-show.amp.html?__twitter_impression=true While some above call Trump names, those same people are OK with the Gestapo/KGB style tactics Mueller and Rosenstein use because it suits their narrative. The ends justify the means
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Logic said: Surely, with that statement, you're talking about Trump supporters. The entire narrative you've swallowed (without evidence) came from the lips of these two men. Both have proven track records of lying to Congress and the American people about spying. Brennan spied on Congress, with 44's approval. Clapper spied on the American people, and lied to Congress about it. I've warned you about this since day one, Logic. And yet, despite your handle, you refuse to use any. ... Any word on who Robert Hannigan is and how he fits into this thread? Or nah?
row_33 Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 29 minutes ago, Logic said: A Trump supporter talking about trying to help OTHER PEOPLE "climb out of the disinformation cloud". Now I've heard everything. ? being a Trump supporter doesn't mean one is 100% automatically wrong actually they've been almost 100% correct
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, Logic said: I realize that the PPP is just an endless cycle of the same 5 or 6 guys going at each other over and over again. I realize that, indeed, we live in an era in which most people DO exist in echo chambers and ARE stubbornly entrenched in their positions. Nevertheless, I find that everything Shaub said -- while at times stated in dramatic language -- is right on the money. Because you're trapped in an echo chambers and despite several attempts to have substantive conversations about the actual facts of the issue - you've run from them every time. You aren't interested in the truth. You're interested in confirming what you already believe to be truth. That's illogical. 1
row_33 Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 (edited) logic is gator's mult?? they show up at the same time and attack with the same words within 30 seconds quite often. Edited June 12, 2018 by row_33
B-Man Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 Time for some diversion.................................? Okay, this is pretty funny: someone has done a really good job of mashing up Donald Trump and James Bond—totally worth your three minutes. Though I have a hard time thinking I’d believe “Trump. . . Donald Trump.” 4 2
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: logic gg's mult?? they show up at the same time and attack with the same words within 30 seconds quite often. Any chance you'd like to add anything that's not functionally retarded? Your contributions here are rapidly becoming little more than a steady flow of stream of consciousness nonsense, invariably ping-ponging between completely absurd, demonstrably false, and not even tangentially related. Your content, for at least several months now, has become the roadside litter of this sub-forum: rank garbage littering an otherwise traversable thoroughfare, providing little more than an eyesore for the passenger simply trying to enjoy the view. This forum had enough stupid before you got here. Please stop adding to the pile.
row_33 Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 22 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Any chance you'd like to add anything that's not functionally retarded? Your contributions here are rapidly becoming little more than a steady flow of stream of consciousness nonsense, invariably ping-ponging between completely absurd, demonstrably false, and not even tangentially related. Your content, for at least several months now, has become the roadside litter of this sub-forum: rank garbage littering an otherwise traversable thoroughfare, providing little more than an eyesore for the passenger simply trying to enjoy the view. This forum had enough stupid before you got here. Please stop adding to the pile. No
Wacka Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: They've been clinging to one narrative for so long - despite there being no evidence to support it, just the affirmations from their echo chambers led by known liars (whose records are ignored) - that they can't turn back now. I've tried for over a year to provide a ladder to climb out of the disinformation cloud. Some took it, others burned it because their pride and ego are more important than truth. Some people are going to have a tougher time than others with what's to come. Tibs: "Hey! Hey! You! You! Get offf of my cloud!" 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 (edited) Ok, so if I am reading this correctly (and I may not be) Muller went to court and said the defendants were not entitled to findings?Mueller on Tuesday asked a federal judge in Washington for an order to protect voluminous evidence sought by lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting LLC, one of three companies and 13 Russian nationals charged in a February indictment alleging election meddling via social media. Prosecutors have uncovered evidence of other individuals and entities who are “continuing to engage” in similar activities. . . .Prosecutors said they have gathered “unclassified but sensitive information that remains relevant to ongoing national security investigations and efforts to protect the integrity of future U.S. elections.”Russia Keeps Meddling, Mueller Says in Bid to Guard Evidence I guess this is what happens when you charge an entity based on nothing, expect them not to show up in court, and they decide to send representation to make you put-up or shut-up. Edited June 13, 2018 by Buffalo_Gal 1
DC Tom Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Ok, so if I am reading this correctly (and I may not be) Muller went to court and said the defendants were not entitled to findings?Mueller on Tuesday asked a federal judge in Washington for an order to protect voluminous evidence sought by lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting LLC, one of three companies and 13 Russian nationals charged in a February indictment alleging election meddling via social media. Prosecutors have uncovered evidence of other individuals and entities who are “continuing to engage” in similar activities. . . .Prosecutors said they have gathered “unclassified but sensitive information that remains relevant to ongoing national security investigations and efforts to protect the integrity of future U.S. elections.”Russia Keeps Meddling, Mueller Says in Bid to Guard Evidence I guess this is what happens when you charge an entity based on nothing, expect them now to show up in court, and they decide to send representation to make you put-up or shut-up. It's what happens when you try to run a counter-intel op and a criminal prosecution at the same time. Maybe, if Mueller was still using sensitive evidence for investigative purposes that would be compromised if the evidence were divulged, he should have waited until those investigations were complete before indicting. Quote Russians ‘trolls’ accused of propaganda, posing as activists NOT. ILLEGAL. 1
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 20 minutes ago, DC Tom said: It's what happens when you try to run a counter-intel op and a criminal prosecution at the same time. Maybe, if Mueller was still using sensitive evidence for investigative purposes that would be compromised if the evidence were divulged, he should have waited until those investigations were complete before indicting. NOT. ILLEGAL. Neither is putting money in a bank, so what?
Recommended Posts