Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's not the subtext of your (continued) "still waiting" lines?

 

Come on, be honest at least.

 

The subtext is your premature ejaculation about an unpublished report you claim to know is going to break open your conspiracy to the masses.

 

keep on fappin loser

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's not the subtext of your (continued) "still waiting" lines?

 

Come on, be honest at least.

 

Will you next ask the sun not to rise tomorrow?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, peace out said:

 

The subtext is your premature ejaculation about an unpublished report you claim to know is going to break open your conspiracy to the masses.

 

keep on fappin loser

 

Loser? Says the guy who's so dishonest and full of **** he has to change screen names and run away from the board when he gets exposed. 

 

Bring something of merit to the table, or continue to cast aspersions to make yourself feel better. Either way, everyone knows who you are and what you stand for: nothing.

Posted

 

 

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Loser? Says the guy who's so dishonest and full of **** he has to change screen names and run away from the board when he gets exposed. 

 

Bring something of merit to the table, or continue to cast aspersions to make yourself feel better. Either way, everyone knows who you are and what you stand for: nothing.

 

6a00d83494ed8153ef014e5f41e71e970c-pi

Posted

You can't even write good comebacks or put downs, Gary. 

 

You've made it clear you care about nothing. You stand for nothing. You offer nothing to this board or community. 

 

Time for another name change, isn't it?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

You can't even write good comebacks or put downs, Gary. 

 

You've made it clear you care about nothing. You stand for nothing. You offer nothing to this board or community. 

 

Time for another name change, isn't it?

 

You can only change it once every 180 days :oops:

Posted

 

And those of you who do care about this issue, the evidence that the report is coming, and has teeth, was released in their semi-annual report. Reading is hard for people like Gary/PeaceOut/Bird/Gator... but it's amazing what you can learn when you do your own homework:

https://oig.justice.gov/semiannual/1805.pdf

 

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2017/2017-01-12.pdf

Just now, peace out said:

 

You can only change it once every 180 days :oops:

 

So maybe you should have the courage of your convictions and "peace out" like you promised you were doing last time you threw a hissy fit and left the board, Gary. At least long enough to come back with a new name.

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

So maybe you should have the courage of your convictions and "peace out" like you promised you were doing last time you threw a hissy fit and left the board, Gary. At least long enough to come back with a new name.

 

Nah. Happy June

Posted

Of course not. You don't have an honest bone in your body. You're not here to contribute or participate. You're here to snipe and deride. 

 

You have a tiny, closed mind and you stand for nothing. 

 

Enjoy what's coming.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

And those of you who do care about this issue, the evidence that the report is coming, and has teeth, was released in their semi-annual report. Reading is hard for people like Gary/PeaceOut/Bird/Gator... but it's amazing what you can learn when you do your own homework:

https://oig.justice.gov/semiannual/1805.pdf

 

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2017/2017-01-12.pdf

 

So maybe you should have the courage of your convictions and "peace out" like you promised you were doing last time you threw a hissy fit and left the board, Gary. At least long enough to come back with a new name.

Blah blah, ya, and the Deep State has already made Hillary president..right? You said that, didn't you? 

Posted

MORE MUELLER MADNESS

When it comes to primary documents like the 20-page letter dated January 29, 2018 from former Trump lawyer John Dowd and the preceding 11-page memo dated June 23, 2017, both resisting an interview of the president by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, my preference is to give readers the originals via Scribd. Having obtained their own copies, the New York Times is forcing us to consult the originals here along with the Times’s annotations. The related Times article is posted here.

 

These documents are must reading. Paul comments on one aspect of Dowd’s January 2018 letter here. I especially enjoyed the list of 16 topics about which Mueller seeks to sit the president down. I put them into bullet point form below with the paragraphs immediately preceding and following:

In our conversation of January 8, your office identified the following topics as areas you desired to address with the President in order to complete your investigation on the subjects of alleged collusion and obstruction of justice:

 

1. Former National Security Advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn — information regarding his contacts with Ambassador Kislyak about sanctions during the transition process;

2. Lt. Gen. Flynn’s communications with Vice President Michael Pence regarding those contacts;

3. Lt. Gen. Flynn’s interview with the FBI regarding the same;

4. Then-Acting Attorney General Sally Yates coming to the White House to discuss same;

5. The President’s meeting on February 14, 2017, with then-Director James Comey;

6 Any other relevant information regarding former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn;

7. The President’s awareness of and reaction to investigations by the FBI, the House and the Senate into possible collusion;

8. The President’s reaction to Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recusal from the Russia investigation;

9. The President’s reaction to Former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony on March 20, 2017, before the House Intelligence Committee;

10. Information related to conversations with intelligence officials generally regarding ongoing investigations;

11. Information regarding who the President had had conversations with concerning Mr. Comey’s performance;

12. Whether or not Mr. Comey’s May 3, 2017, testimony led to his termination;

13. Information regarding communications with Ambassador Kislyak, Minister Lavrov, and Lester Holt;

14. The President’s reaction to the appointment of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel;

15. The President’s interaction with Attorney General Sessions as it relates to the appointment of Special Counsel; and,

16. The statement of July 8, 2017, concerning Donald Trump, Jr.’s meeting in Trump Tower.

 

 

It is our understanding that the reason behind the request for the interview is to allow the Special Counsel’s office to complete its report. After reviewing the list of topics you presented, it is abundantly clear to the undersigned that all of the answers to your inquiries are contained in the exhibits and testimony that have already been voluntarily provided to you by the White House and witnesses, all of which clearly show that there was no collusion with Russia, and that no FBI investigation was or even could have been obstructed.

 

 

Putting the legal disputation to one side, I would simply like to note that the list of topics runs far afield from the subject of Trump-Russia campaign collusion that we are led to believe is the subject of Mueller’s investigation. Anyone can see that this is a living farce.

 

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/more-mueller-madness-5.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+powerlineblog%2Flivefeed+(Power+Line)

 

 

 

 

.

Posted
7 hours ago, B-Man said:
Putting the legal disputation to one side, I would simply like to note that the list of topics runs far afield from the subject of Trump-Russia campaign collusion that we are led to believe is the subject of Mueller’s investigation. Anyone can see that this is a living farce..

 

The list of topics seem more designed towards manufacturing a lying/misleading information charge than anything relevant to the actual Russia investigation.

 

What the !@#$ does Trump's 'reaction' to Mueller's appointment have to do with anything?

Posted (edited)

Giuliani to HuffPost: Trump could have 'shot James Comey' and not be prosecuted

 

Donald Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani claimed Sunday that the President hypothetically could have shot the former FBI director to end the Russia investigation and not face prosecution for it while in office.

 

Giuliani told HuffPost in an interview that Trump's presidential power extends so far that "in no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted."

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/03/politics/rudy-giuliani-trump-shoot-comey-impeachment/index.html

 

Trump Says He Has The ‘Absolute Right’ To Pardon Himself

 

President Donald Trump boasted about his “absolute right” to pardon himself in the Russia probe on Monday one day after Rudy Giuliani, one of his lawyers, raised the prospect.

 

“Numerous legal scholars” have pointed out that Trump holds the constitutional authority to a self-pardon, he tweeted. “But why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?” He also lambasted the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller as unconstitutional.

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-right-pardon-himself_us_5b15336ee4b010565aadd774

Edited by ALF
×
×
  • Create New...