Nanker Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 (edited) Or, it's a matter of how far Trump wants to put his foot up 44's ass, and who do they allow Sessions to prosecute for criminality. There's a long list of critters that should suffer the torture of defending themselves and their actions in courts of law where the public will see and hear the evidence of their treachery. I could see the "negotiations" as an implied limit on how many of these creatures that Sessions will be allowed to hang in the public square. Edited April 20, 2018 by Nanker grammah!
row_33 Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 10 minutes ago, snafu said: "Negotiation" implies give and take. not really, each side does whatever it wants, one is obviously stronger and the weaker one with skill and patience can string out nothing for eternity
snafu Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 47 minutes ago, row_33 said: not really, each side does whatever it wants, one is obviously stronger and the weaker one with skill and patience can string out nothing for eternity That doesn't quite work in this case - when each side has been heavily investigated for 18 months or more. I'd presume that each side would know pretty much what the other one has to lose.
Nanker Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 (edited) 16 hours ago, snafu said: "Negotiation" implies give and take. Exactly. Rudy, “Special Councel Muller, The Administration will pursue criminal indictments against Hillary Clinton, DWS, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, James Clapper, John Brennan, John and Tony Podesta, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, all principles of Fusion GPS, and retired British agent Steele for conspiracy to undermine the 2016 election process and their pursuit of the nullification of the results of that election process.” Muller, “Drop Hillary from that list and I’ll wrap up my investigation in two weeks.” Edited April 21, 2018 by Nanker two more chips added to the pot
Koko78 Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 5 hours ago, njbuff said: TDS. The FDA is still working on medication for the disease. No need. 1
Nanker Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 Oh WOW man! That’s so cosmic man. I hope to score big time man. Do you think Bob would like share man? Groovy. Wonder if blonde Lebanese hash would work as well. I left a fat mattress somewhere. Just can’t remember exactly where.
Koko78 Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: They were his own notes If they contained classified information, they were no longer "his own notes." 1
DC Tom Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 9 minutes ago, Koko78 said: If they contained classified information, they were no longer "his own notes." Not entirely true. He just 1) shouldn't have been removing them from a secure environment, and 2) shouldn't have been distributing them. But writing down a secret doesn't make it the government's property. This is the US government we're talking about, not Facebook.
Koko78 Posted April 20, 2018 Posted April 20, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Not entirely true. He just 1) shouldn't have been removing them from a secure environment, and 2) shouldn't have been distributing them. But writing down a secret doesn't make it the government's property. This is the US government we're talking about, not Facebook. Fair enough, but the point I was (poorly) making was that he did not have full control of his notes.
Thurmal34 Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 Should I link Rudy saying Trump told him to make the Muslim ban legal? Or is it finally accepted as fact?
Logic Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 9 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Late night tweet: Nothing says "innocent man" quite like Tweeting this type of nonsense at 11pm on a Friday night.
row_33 Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 Grateful I haven’t spent 2 minutes total on political tweets.
Logic Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 All three of Trump's new lawyers have spent decades on organized crime cases, racketeering, and complex white collar criminal defenseshttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5640043/All-three-Trumps-new-lawyers-experience-organized-crime-racketeering-cases.html Trump hired criminal defense attorneys Martin and Jane Raskin Marty Raskin has experience dealing with the mob and complex racketeering cases as a federal prosecutor He served on an organized Crime and Racketeering Section One case involved a complex securities fraud involving pension fraud and kickbacks His wife, Jane, was a lawyer with Organized Crime and Racketeering Section's Boston Strike Force Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5640043/All-three-Trumps-new-lawyers-experience-organized-crime-racketeering-cases.html#ixzz5DJq1Axw9 Oh, ya know, no big deal. Just the President of the United States hiring a mob lawyer. Nothing to see here.
row_33 Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 I have worked on the side of the police and FBI, and the highest levels of the dark side irs a sign of career excellence to graduate from prosecuting to defending.
B-Man Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 KARMA: James Comey may face criminal charges for doing exactly what he let Hillary get away with.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 35 minutes ago, Logic said: Nothing says "innocent man" quite like Tweeting this type of nonsense at 11pm on a Friday night. By that standard, what does Comey's desperate (and now disasterous) book tour say about his innocence?
Logic Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: By that standard, what does Comey's desperate (and now disasterous) book tour say about his innocence? Nothing like a little Whataboutism to deflect attention away from the original point.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Logic said: Nothing like a little Whataboutism to deflect attention away from the original point. It's an honest follow up to an original point which is devoid of a real substance. There's over 168 pages in this thread detailing there's no evidence for collision - but a tweet stating a now confirmed fact that Comey leaked classified Intel to kick off the SC is real evidence? Nah. You were taking a shot because you're frustrated. That's fine. But don't act as if you were doing anything more. Because if you truly believe what you said, then my question is more than fair: what does Comey's embarrassing performance on the first week of is book tour prove in your mind? We have real evidence he committed crimes and lied about it. He lied during his tour about opening the McCabe investigation himself after all - something we know he didn't do. He lied so easy there, don't you think it's possible he lied more than that one time on live tv? 48 minutes ago, Logic said: All three of Trump's new lawyers have spent decades on organized crime cases, racketeering, and complex white collar criminal defenseshttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5640043/All-three-Trumps-new-lawyers-experience-organized-crime-racketeering-cases.html Trump hired criminal defense attorneys Martin and Jane Raskin Marty Raskin has experience dealing with the mob and complex racketeering cases as a federal prosecutor He served on an organized Crime and Racketeering Section One case involved a complex securities fraud involving pension fraud and kickbacks His wife, Jane, was a lawyer with Organized Crime and Racketeering Section's Boston Strike Force Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5640043/All-three-Trumps-new-lawyers-experience-organized-crime-racketeering-cases.html#ixzz5DJq1Axw9 Oh, ya know, no big deal. Just the President of the United States hiring a mob lawyer. Nothing to see here. Today we learned Logic doesn't know the difference between a defense attorney and a prosecutor. Edited April 21, 2018 by Deranged Rhino
Recommended Posts