Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Last Thursday, the Majority Staff of the United States House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology released a report titled Russian Attempts to Influence U.S. Domestic Energy Markets by Exploiting Social Media. It doesn’t seem to have gotten as much attention as it deserves.

 

The House report notes Russia’s strong interest in depressing petroleum production in the U.S. (“American energy represents a direct threat to Russian energy interests.”) Russia has defended its interests by funding American environmental organizations:

Russian-sponsored agents funneled money to U.S. environmental organizations in an attempt to portray energy companies in a negative way and disrupt domestic energy markets.
***
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, then-Secretary General of NATO, told reporters in 2014, “Russia, as part of their sophisticated information and disinformation operations, engaged actively with so-called nongovernmental organizations—environmental organizations working against shale gas—to maintain dependence on imported Russian gas.”

Could we have a little accountability here? Which environmental organizations took money from Russia to try to weaken the American energy sector? Did they do it wittingly or unwittingly? What was the Russian money used for? Our press has shown a remarkable lack of curiosity about these basic questions.

 

Screen-Shot-2018-03-06-at-6.35.44-PM.png...............................Screen-Shot-2018-03-06-at-6.39.47-PM.png

 

 

 

 

Screen-Shot-2018-03-06-at-6.36.38-PM.png................................Screen-Shot-2018-03-06-at-6.38.04-PM.png

 

 

 

 

Russia’s anti-fracking and anti-pipeline campaign went farther than its participation in the presidential election.

Russia not only spread propaganda through RT and American social media, it also donated money to allegedly respectable American environmental organizations. How much? We don’t know.

 

 

What we do know is that the effort to suppress American energy production meant a lot more to Russia’s rulers than its mischievous support for Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump, and opposition to Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton. We know that the Russians spent only a few million dollars on their election “meddling.” How much did they spend to support American liberals in their effort to block U.S. energy development? We don’t know, but I, for one, would be very interested to find out.

 

 

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/03/how-russia-tried-to-block-us-energy-production.php

 
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

 

Nothing to see here... just "man of mystery" Nader being apprehended at Dulles with subpoenas as he was on his way to Mar-a-lago to meet with orange!@#$er

Edited by garybusey
Posted
10 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Nothing to see here... just "man of mystery" Nader being apprehended at Dulles with subpoenas as he was on his way to Mar-a-lago to meet with orange!@#$er

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/06/us/politics/george-nader-special-counsel-mueller-cooperating-seychelles.html

 

On 3/5/2018 at 5:12 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

************

:lol::lol:

 

It just keeps getting better:

 

 

What's left out of all the coverage today on Nader? 

 

He's Bill Clinton's boy. The Clinton Foundation took in over $10m from the UAE while HRC was SecState. 

 

Mueller is not investigating what most people think he is. It's becoming more undeniable by the day now.

 

Your "reality" is lying to you, Gary. 

 

Every single American indicted so far - bar one - has far more Clinton ties than they have Trump ties. That's a fact, not an opinion. 

 

The turn to the UAE is about Manafort and Podesta. I guarantee it.

Posted

 

6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/06/us/politics/george-nader-special-counsel-mueller-cooperating-seychelles.html

 

 

Your "reality" is lying to you, Gary. 

 

Every single American indicted so far - bar one - has far more Clinton ties than they have Trump ties. That's a fact, not an opinion. 

 

The turn to the UAE is about Manafort and Podesta. I guarantee it.

 

nkcju9t.jpg

Posted

I don't know what that means. But I'm not trying to be a dick about it, I'm being objectively honest. From the indictments thus far, what I said is objectively the truth. Every one of them have deep Clinton ties and almost zero ties to Trump (but for Flynn). 

 

I admit fully my take on what Mueller is really doing is speculation - open to it being wrong when new information becomes available - but right now, there's far more actual evidence behind my speculation than there is behind the narrative you've bought into. 

Posted

Thats okay DR, you do great work on here.

 

its just that everything a Clinton does is swept aside and nothing happens to them.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

I don't know what that means.

 

 

I do. Every time you step up to the metaphorical podium, he throws a metaphorical tomato.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, njbuff said:

I will believe in a Godzilla sighting more than Trump-Russian collusion.

 

Thats how bad this whole thing is.

Well, of course you would 

Posted
On 3/5/2018 at 5:03 PM, Tiberius said:

While he was working for Trump, it seems 

What proof do you have to back up that ignorant statement? Is it the tingle in your leg?

Posted
31 minutes ago, westside said:

What proof do you have to back up that ignorant statement? Is it the tingle in your leg?

No, its the sh it in your mouth B-)

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

No, its the sh it in your mouth B-)

Lol, so you can't provide proof of what you claimed? Didn't think so. You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. 

How much do you get paid to be a constant source of distraction to the truth? That's all you are, a road block, not even as intelligent as a orange cone. I pity you, I really do.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, westside said:

Lol, so you can't provide proof of what you claimed? Didn't think so. You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. 

How much do you get paid to be a constant source of distraction to the truth? That's all you are, a road block, not even as intelligent as a orange cone. I pity you, I really do.

You never have anything to say but insults, where do you get off complaining that others don't do enough? Hypocrite 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

You never have anything to say but insults, where do you get off complaining that others don't do enough? Hypocrite 

Talk about hypocrisy:

 

"No, its the sh it in your mouth B-)"

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Talk about hypocrisy:

 

"No, its the sh it in your mouth B-)"

I feel sorry for you, I really do! :lol:

 

Know why? You actually are now a follower of DR :doh:

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You never have anything to say but insults, where do you get off complaining that others don't do enough? Hypocrite 

If I don't know much about a topic,  I don't plug my ears and close my eyes and make up bull **** to try to sound smart.  DR, TYTT, DC and a few others I apologize for leaving out have actually invested time into finding out the truth. Which I am truly grateful for.

What do you do besides giving your soul to the Clintons? Deny, deny, deny........that's all you do. You're the dung beattle of PPP.

Posted
1 minute ago, westside said:

If I don't know much about a topic,  I don't plug my ears and close my eyes and make up bull **** to try to sound smart.  DR, TYTT, DC and a few others I apologize for leaving out have actually invested time into finding out the truth. Which I am truly grateful for.

What do you do besides giving your soul to the Clintons? Deny, deny, deny........that's all you do. You're the dung beattle of PPP.

 

You're the dung beetle of your anus.

×
×
  • Create New...