Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

I heard the CNN one live.

 

He is off his rocker

 

But he said something about Page and Trump being guilty, so he's now a paragon of truth and virtue. 

 

Like other reformed liars: Clapper, Brennan, Hayden. 

 

That's how the game works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

But he said something about Page and Trump being guilty, so he's now a paragon of truth and virtue

 

Like other reformed liars: Clapper, Brennan, Hayden. 

 

That's how the game works. 

 

No.

 

He's off his rocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cinga said:

I've seen this posted before, but where are those numbers coming from?

 

PACER can check them all (it's a paid site). 

 

Key thing to point out: we don't know what the sealed orders are because they are sealed. They could be indictments, could be search warrants - we don't have any way to know until they're unsealed. 

 

What we CAN see is that the number of sealed orders are higher than ever before in known history. The sealed indictments started trickling in in November (right after the KSA purge). The average number of sealed orders per year prior to this was about 1,200. 

 

1,200 for the whole year. We've had 18k in the last two months, which are added to the 10k since November. 

 

We don't know what this means... but it shows something big is happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

No.

 

He's off his rocker.

 

You quoted him earlier as proof that Page colluded with Russians. 

 

Just saying.

1 hour ago, garybusey said:

"Carter Page was colluding with the Russians... yes I believe Carter Page was colluding with the Russians."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, garybusey said:

I posted the quote after saying...

 

Sam Nunberg interview(s)... holy ****!

 

That guy is out of his mind.

 

Show me where I said it was proof, liar.

 

I just posted your entire quote - which you dropped without context as if it were proof of something. 

 

Now you're saying he's off his rocker - good. 

 

But don't deny you were quoting that as evidence for your side of this discussion. That's just being dishonest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I just posted your entire quote - which you dropped without context as if it were proof of something. 

 

Now you're saying he's off his rocker - good. 

 

But don't deny you were quoting that as evidence for your side of this discussion. That's just being dishonest. 

 

Look a couple posts above it, coward.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I just posted your entire quote - which you dropped without context as if it were proof of something. 

 

Now you're saying he's off his rocker - good. 

 

But don't deny you were quoting that as evidence for your side of this discussion. That's just being dishonest. 


So you're reading people's minds now? And putting words in their mouths? Cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, garybusey said:

Sam Nunberg interview(s)... holy ****!

 

That guy is out of his mind.

 

1 hour ago, garybusey said:

"Carter Page was colluding with the Russians... yes I believe Carter Page was colluding with the Russians."

 

1 hour ago, garybusey said:

"Donald Trump caused this because he's an idiot"

 

20 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

I heard the CNN one live.

 

He is off his rocker

 

Here it is in chronological order.

 

But keep yelling FAKE NEWS AND DEEPSTATE

 

DR = Dumb Republican

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Nope. I'm taking what they post. He knows why he posted that comment. You do too. 

 

You are better at posting crap about Hillary throwing her own election because Seth Rich was killed by Liberal cyberbots, stick to that nonsense you little fool 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I missed the first one. :beer: 

 

I'm not sure it changes your point anyway.  

 

I mean...let's face it, people are ONLY hearing anything now through their own confirmation bias.  Nunberg's statement is proof to Democrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

I'm not sure it changes your point anyway.  

 

I mean...let's face it, people are ONLY hearing anything now through their own confirmation bias.  Nunberg's statement is proof to Democrats.

 

Of course it doesn't. But I did miss his preface... if that's what he's claiming it was now. I've never been above admitting when I miss something. :beer: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm not sure it changes your point anyway.  

 

I mean...let's face it, people are ONLY hearing anything now through their own confirmation bias.  Nunberg's statement is proof to Democrats.



At least you admit THAT! If Nunberg's statement is "proof to democrats" (even though we both just sat here and said he was a looney tune), then his statement is automatically "FAKE NEWS!" to the Pro-Trump crowd. That side is pretty good at sticking their fingers in their ears and shouting "LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!"

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Of course it doesn't. But I did miss his preface... if that's what he's claiming it was now. I've never been above admitting when I miss something. :beer: 

 

Never admit a mistake.  It's a sign of weakness.  kitty.

Just now, Logic said:



At least you admit THAT! If Nunberg's statement is "proof to democrats" (even though we both just sat here and said he was a looney tune), then his statement is automatically "FAKE NEWS!" to the Pro-Trump crowd. That side is pretty good at sticking their fingers in their ears and shouting "LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!"

 

Why wouldn't I admit that?

 

This whole issue has become nothing more than competing hearsay, and has been for a while.  It's a load of horseshit, and has been nothing but since we decided "competing Senate memos" were evidentiary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...