Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Why are people up in arms about it in 2016, when Russia's/USSR's meddling in US politics since the 1950's has caused far greater damage?

cuz, Trump!

 

291.jpg

Posted

Thanks for the thoughtful and well put response. I'm not surprised to see myself in agreement with you as usual. My question really was about the propaganda phenomenon in general, not necessarily the Russian contribution. It's a subject that's long fascinated me since studying the impact that it played in ancient Roman and Greek politics, not to mention Germany and other parts of Europe in the 30s. Im currently involved in reasearching how media deregulation in the 80s and the abolition of the Fairness Doctrine have contributed to the issue. Thanks again.

:beer:

Posted

 

The real enemy isn't Russia. The real enemy is within. It's the system that educated - or failed to educate - those people who were swayed by the Russian propaganda on basic critical thinking skills. We don't teach that anymore, we teach our kids how to pass tests not how to think. Our education syste :beer:m is in tatters in part because we spend billions a year on defense instead of investing that into our people and future.

 

You can't educate people to be smarter. I don't care how much money you spend people will still be swayed by propaganda.

Posted

You can't educate people to be smarter. I don't care how much money you spend people will still be swayed by propaganda.

 

I disagree, but leave that aside. What's the solution you would propose to this specific issue?

Posted

 

I disagree, but leave that aside. What's the solution you would propose to this specific issue?

There is no solution to people being played on their biases. Not saying education is not important, but it won't create perfect citizens, where everyone is above average

Posted

There is no solution to people being played on their biases. Not saying education is not important, but it won't create perfect citizens, where everyone is above average

 

Asking with genuine interest, not trying to pick a fight: if that's true, are you suggesting that those who are below average should be protected from thinking for themselves?

Posted

 

Asking with genuine interest, not trying to pick a fight: if that's true, are you suggesting that those who are below average should be protected from thinking for themselves?

No, even the dullest person can understand their own interests better than someone else in political matters

Posted

I heard about that on the ride into work.

 

He's also digging up dirt on everyone on the council.

Mueller had a Golf membership at one of Trump's resorts and the Trump team is floating the idea he left in anger

 

It didn't take Mueller long to stack the deck.

 

 

Here’s a Look at Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 15 Attorneys: A Who’s Who of Liberal Activism

by Jim Hoft

 

Original Article

 

This is lame. Loose threads the Trump team is grasping at

Posted

 

It didn't take Mueller long to stack the deck.

 

 

Here’s a Look at Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 15 Attorneys: A Who’s Who of Liberal Activism

by Jim Hoft

 

Original Article

 

 

 

This was a big mistake on Mueller's part, when you have such an important investigation it is critically important that you conduct the process which includes the staffing in a way that protects the integrity of the investigation. If this had been an investigation on Obama and you had staffed a bunch of lawyers who had contributed solely to right wing politicians there is no doubt that people from the left would be up in and arms and the media without doubt would have made that the story. I am 99% convinced that would be the case. You would have thought the fact that he is friends with Comey that he would have tried to lessen the appearance that there was some sort of conflict of interest but he clearly decided that he didn't care.

 

How hard would have it been for him to simply staff up with people who didn't financially support the last Democratic nominee or president? Would that have been so hard?

 

From my perspective and I like to think that I try to see things from a balanced perspective that this investigation is already tainted. Because he has done it this way, it will cause not just Trump supporters but some people from the middle to believe that this investigation is largely going to be conducted as a fishing expedition.

Posted

 

 

This was a big mistake on Mueller's part, when you have such an important investigation it is critically important that you conduct the process which includes the staffing in a way that protects the integrity of the investigation. If this had been an investigation on Obama and you had staffed a bunch of lawyers who had contributed solely to right wing politicians there is no doubt that people from the left would be up in and arms and the media without doubt would have made that the story. I am 99% convinced that would be the case. You would have thought the fact that he is friends with Comey that he would have tried to lessen the appearance that there was some sort of conflict of interest but he clearly decided that he didn't care.

 

How hard would have it been for him to simply staff up with people who didn't financially support the last Democratic nominee or president? Would that have been so hard?

 

From my perspective and I like to think that I try to see things from a balanced perspective that this investigation is already tainted. Because he has done it this way, it will cause not just Trump supporters but some people from the middle to believe that this investigation is largely going to be conducted as a fishing expedition.

You can't hire anyone in Washington who hasn't donated to someone, worked on some controversial case or represented someone some one else doesn't like. So many of those connections are pretty lame. And Mueller is supposidly a Republican, appointed by Republicans and confirmed by bi-partisan majorities in the Senate. He hired who he thought were the best people. This argument will work with THAT 1/3 of the population but that is it.

Posted

 

 

This was a big mistake on Mueller's part, when you have such an important investigation it is critically important that you conduct the process which includes the staffing in a way that protects the integrity of the investigation. If this had been an investigation on Obama and you had staffed a bunch of lawyers who had contributed solely to right wing politicians there is no doubt that people from the left would be up in and arms and the media without doubt would have made that the story. I am 99% convinced that would be the case. You would have thought the fact that he is friends with Comey that he would have tried to lessen the appearance that there was some sort of conflict of interest but he clearly decided that he didn't care.

 

How hard would have it been for him to simply staff up with people who didn't financially support the last Democratic nominee or president? Would that have been so hard?

 

From my perspective and I like to think that I try to see things from a balanced perspective that this investigation is already tainted. Because he has done it this way, it will cause not just Trump supporters but some people from the middle to believe that this investigation is largely going to be conducted as a fishing expedition.

 

Honestly, i hope trump subverts the whole thing.

 

They hand out convictions, he hands out pardons and a middle finger.

Posted

 

It didn't take Mueller long to stack the deck.

 

 

Here’s a Look at Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 15 Attorneys: A Who’s Who of Liberal Activism

by Jim Hoft

 

Original Article

 

 

Pardon me....but if this is a witch hunt and DT has done no wrong...then liberal flailing should not matter....correct?

 

DT should just sit down with the Counsel, open his books/whatever and end the conversation.....

 

Honestly, i hope trump subverts the whole thing.

 

They hand out convictions, he hands out pardons and a middle finger.

 

As soon as things come to light, the pardons will start and even the GOP congress will move to impeach.....and I will cash in on my bets that DT doesn't go full term....

Posted

You can't hire anyone in Washington who hasn't donated to someone, worked on some controversial case or represented someone some one else doesn't like. So many of those connections are pretty lame. And Mueller is supposidly a Republican, appointed by Republicans and confirmed by bi-partisan majorities in the Senate. He hired who he thought were the best people. This argument will work with THAT 1/3 of the population but that is it.

 

Not surprising you'd say this, you're a hardcore partisan.

 

The results of a new IBD/TIPP Poll suggest that many Americans are highly skeptical of both Mueller and the ongoing investigation into Russian meddling in last year's election.

Mueller was named to be special counsel after President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey in May. Comey was investigating claims that Russia interfered in the U.S. election and that the Trump campaign may have colluded with Russian officials.

Since then, Mueller himself has come under fire for hiring a number of prosecutors who donated to Hillary Clinton, which some see as a possible conflict of interest.

Moreover, one of the prosecutors that Mueller added to his team, Andrew Rosenstein, previously worked for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, whom Trump also fired. And Mueller and Comey, his successor at the FBI, are known to be close friends.

So, in the minds of many, the conflicts in the Mueller investigation are piling up, as the IBD/TIPP data clearly indicate. The IBD/TIPP Poll data were gathered June 23 to June 29.

Perhaps most seriously, among the 614 polled who say they're following the Russia story closely, 49% say that Special Counsel Mueller's friendship with former FBI Director James Comey represents a "conflict of interest for Mueller's investigation." Some 47% disagreed.

The results, no surprise here, skewed sharply according to party affiliation. A majority of Republicans (81%) and Independents (52%) said Mueller had a conflict of interest with his Comey friendship. Just 26% of Democrats agreed.

Meanwhile, even more poll respondents — including a surprising number of Democrats — felt a conflict existed in the fact that Mueller had interviewed with the White House to replace former FBI chief Comey, who stands at the center of the investigation into Russia's alleged tampering with the 2016 vote and alleged collusion with the Trump campaign.

Mueller was no stranger to the job, having held the post from 2001 to 2013, under both President Bush and President Obama. Based on that, it should be no surprise that the White House would want to interview him.

But the IBD/TIPP Poll shows Americans seem bothered by this. Some 52% agreed that Mueller's job interview was a conflict of interest going forward for the investigation, while just 40% disagreed. No surprise that 70% of Republicans and 52% of Independents felt this was a problem. But 41% of Democrats also did.

As for the charge that many of the lawyers hired by Mueller for his team were Hillary Clinton supporters, just 44% agreed that this was a "legitimate concern," while 52% disagreed. But again, Republicans (83%) and Independents (51%) were a majority thinking it was a concern. Just 13% of Democrats did.

 

 

 

Strip away the listed R's and D's and your claim goes down the drain.

Posted

Mag, you are not a hard core partisan? Ok!

 

Your poll proves nothing

 

I love some of the other titles of polls from that site: "People like the Senate health care bill more than that realize!"

 

"Trump's approval poised for a bounce!"

 

Posted

There is no solution to people being played on their biases. Not saying education is not important, but it won't create perfect citizens, where everyone is above average

What's next, making everyone a 1%er? I don't know how you figure out how to put your shoes on in the morning.

Posted (edited)

What's next, making everyone a 1%er? I don't know how you figure out how to put your shoes on in the morning.

Yes, it is tough with a sore back to put on shoes in the morning. Thanks for making fun of my condition

Edited by Tiberius
×
×
  • Create New...