Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Is "obstruction" a new way of spelling "collusion"?

 

 

No............but he proves again that he doesn't understand the words "obvious" & "overwhelming" since there is no such evidence here in the real world.

 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No............but he proves again that he doesn't understand the words "obvious" & "overwhelming" since there is no such evidence here in the real world.

 

 

 

Nevermind "obvious" and "overwhelming", there isn't even and "unconvincing" or "circumstantial" evidence.

Posted

Did Justice Department FISA Fraud Create U.S. District Court Judge Recusal?…

Quote

 

On the night of Thursday December 7th, 2017 it was announced that U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras was recused from the case against General Mike Flynn.  This recusal came five days after Judge Contreras accepted the initial pleading from Flynn.  Almost two months have passed, and there’s no explanation why?

(Reuters) The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge presiding over the criminal case for President Donald Trump’s former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has been recused from handling the case, a court spokeswoman said on Thursday. (read more)

If sufficient judicial conflict existed on December 7th, why wasn’t that conflict present on December 1st, when Judge Contreras presided over Flynn’s initial pleading?

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/28/did-justice-department-fisa-fraud-create-u-s-district-court-judge-recusal/

Posted
15 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

Obvious to whom he was obstructing? The evidence is overwhelming? Didn't the President just come and say he will talk to Mueller?

 

You are nothing but a Trump hating shill. Everyone sees thru your stupid BS.

 

If there is Russian crap, it's more likely on the other side. I won't convict anyone till the EVIDENCE comes out, unlike an idiot like you.

Do you even know the facts adding up for obstruction? Come on, you must know a few of the things he did that can be considered obstruction. List a few of them. I bet you can't because you have your head in the ground 

Posted

Not a big deal people. Too much stress on this forum for a history that repeats itself all of the time:

 

When Republicans in Power, create Tax Break, economy crashes towards end of mandate, Liberals clean up the crap, get the economy going again, lose the election, Republicans start the vicious cycle again.

 

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, KW95 said:

Not a big deal people. Too much stress on this forum for a history that repeats itself all of the time:

 

When Republicans in Power, create Tax Break, economy crashes towards end of mandate, Liberals clean up the crap, get the economy going again, lose the election, Republicans start the vicious cycle again.

 

 

You must be referring to Obama's 8 Summers of Recovery.

Posted
4 minutes ago, KW95 said:

Funny how people forget 2010.

Thank you Obama and Liberals for making America Great Again

You libs certainly have a sense of entitlement. First you try to steal the economy now you try to steal a slogan. Those are not yours. You didn't make that happen.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Here it comes - the spin I already discussed a few days ago now: 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-steele-dossier-fits-the-kremlin-playbook-1517175564

 

It's not going to work.

 

I'm trying to understand what's so objectionable in that commentary.

1 hour ago, KW95 said:

Not a big deal people. Too much stress on this forum for a history that repeats itself all of the time:

 

When Republicans in Power, create Tax Break, economy crashes towards end of mandate, Liberals clean up the crap, get the economy going again, lose the election, Republicans start the vicious cycle again.

 

 

Thats-Gold-Jerry-Gold-Kenny-Bania-Quote-

 

 

Posted

The idea that the dossier is really even that important is misplaced. If there was no dossier we would still be in the same spot with the GOP trying to obstruct the investigation in other ways 

Posted
1 hour ago, KW95 said:

Not a big deal people. Too much stress on this forum for a history that repeats itself all of the time:

 

When Republicans in Power, create Tax Break, economy crashes towards end of mandate, Liberals clean up the crap, get the economy going again, lose the election, Republicans start the vicious cycle again.

 

 

Well, this might be the dumbest thing I've seen here in a while. 

Posted
On 1/28/2018 at 8:04 AM, Nanker said:

A 12 judge military tribunal panel has been meeting for over a month on this. They use 12 when the death penalty is in play. :blink:

 

 

What the heck are you talking about?   Is that a reference to a tv show or realit6?

Posted
2 hours ago, KW95 said:

Not a big deal people. Too much stress on this forum for a history that repeats itself all of the time:

 

When Republicans in Power, create Tax Break, economy crashes towards end of mandate, Liberals clean up the crap, get the economy going again, lose the election, Republicans start the vicious cycle again.

 

 

 Trump's actions on deregulation, trade policy and his overall moral laxity will come back to bite him. Something will happen because of those things. Environmental disaster, major corruption on wall street and/or an unwanted trade war. Ticking time bomb. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The idea that the dossier is really even that important is misplaced. If there was no dossier we would still be in the same spot with the GOP trying to obstruct the investigation in other ways 

 

Yeah... except that if there were no dossier, there would be no investigation to "obstruct". We'll just ignore the fact that you don't understand what "obstruction" actually means.

 

Though I do like this new DNC-approved talking point that the discredited memo that started the investigation no longer matters. It's like Americans dying in Libya, what does it matter?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Koko78 said:

 

Yeah... except that if there were no dossier, there would be no investigation to "obstruct". We'll just ignore the fact that you don't understand what "obstruction" actually means.

 

Though I do like this new DNC-approved talking point that the discredited memo that started the investigation no longer matters. It's like Americans dying in Libya, what does it matter?

How did the dossier lead to the obstruction investigation? I don't think you can explain that. Because it's not true

×
×
  • Create New...