Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Cinga said:

 

This needs to happen yesterday... We'll soon be in another Shumer Shutdown that will steal the limelight on lamestream news

 

There's definitely going to be / already has been a push to control the narrative (all by people who haven't read the memo). This week will see an uptick in it. 

 

STOTU should be interesting. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

It's coming. 

 

They already have everything they're asking for, and they know the exact involvement of everyone named.  This is Brazile's chance to come clean and get some degree of leniency for herself.

Posted
2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

They already have everything they're asking for, and they know the exact involvement of everyone named.  This is Brazile's chance to come clean and get some degree of leniency for herself.

 

Absolutely. They've already got people singing too. 

 

This is being rolled out in clear stages, Nunes - Grassley - Goodlatte - Horowitz. 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-justice-department-withholds-majority-of-fbi-texts/article/2647289?platform=hootsuite

Posted

Oh no, he's not acting guilty: 

 

 

Quote

 

On Wednesday, as Republicans were clamoring to make public a secret document they think will undercut the investigation into Russian meddling, President Trump made clear his desire: Release the memo.

Trump’s directive was at odds with his own Justice Department, which had warned that releasing the classified memo written by congressional Republicans would be “extraordinarily reckless” without an official review. Nevertheless, White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly relayed the president’s view to Attorney General Jeff Sessions — although the decision to release the document ultimately lies with Congress.

Kelly and Sessions spoke twice that day — in person during a small-group afternoon meeting and over the phone later that evening — and Kelly conveyed Trump’s desire, a senior administration official said.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-sought-release-of-classified-russia-memo-putting-him-at-odds-with-justice-department/2018/01/27/a00f2a4c-02bb-11e8-9d31-d72cf78dbeee_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumpreconstruct546pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.b21dab5fcc70

Posted
12 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

They already have everything they're asking for, and they know the exact involvement of everyone named.  This is Brazile's chance to come clean and get some degree of leniency for herself.

 

Yes, and I think she's ripe for coming clean.  She already distanced herself from her former pals when she released her book.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Nanker said:

A 12 judge military tribunal panel has been meeting for over a month on this. They use 12 when the death penalty is in play. :blink:

 

 

 

I would refer people back to the EO on 12/21/17. It lays out how some of these folks are going to be w through tribunals just like that. 

 

This has been well planned and executed for over a year while most people were distracted chasing Russian squirrels. 

 

Possibly important: http://www.endusmilitarism.org/PDF/military_detention_of_US_citizens_and_18_USC_4001a.pdf

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Added a source
Posted

Excellent insight from a expert.

 

What alleged illegality is Mueller investigating?
Trump exercising lawful presidential authority?

by Victoria Toensing

 

Original Article

 

 

Special Counsel Robert Mueller wants to interview President Trump. We know that is true because the areas of inquiry that Mueller is interested in have been leaked. But the questions Mueller is looking at are not about the issue the special counsel was supposed to examine: collusion with Russians to fix the 2016 presidential election.

 

Rather, the Washington Post reports that Mueller “is seeking to question President Trump in the coming weeks about his decisions to oust national security adviser Michael Flynn and FBI Director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with his plans.”

 

The two acts, according to the Post, are related to “efforts by the president or others to hamper the special counsel’s probe.” 

 

How can that be? Flynn had nothing to do with the special counsel’s probe. And firing the head of the FBI does not thwart what all the people under him are doing. So what is the alleged illegality here that could possibly “hamper” or obstruct the investigation?

 

It is beside the point at this time that there is no such crime as colluding.

 

 

 

.

Posted
42 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Rather, the Washington Post reports that Mueller “is seeking to question President Trump in the coming weeks about his decisions to oust national security adviser Michael Flynn and FBI Director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with his plans.”

 

The two acts, according to the Post, are related to “efforts by the president or others to hamper the special counsel’s probe.”

 

 

How does one hamper a special counsel's probe, before there's a special counsel's probe?

 

Is Trump just that damned good at colluding/obstructing/liberaltears?

Posted
46 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

How does one hamper a special counsel's probe, before there's a special counsel's probe?

 

Is Trump just that damned good at colluding/obstructing/liberaltears?

 

Not only that, but how does one obstruct justice (asking Comey to go easy on Flynn) when the ultimate result is that Flynn was investigated, charged, and eventually pled guilty to that charge?  I'd say that Trump is actually bad at obstructing justice.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, njbuff said:

But, but, but..........

 

according to the resident moron, Tib.........

 

Trump and the Russians are in bed together.

Well, all the evidence isn't there yet, more will come out for sure

 

its obvious he was/is obstructing justice. The evidence is overwhelming. So, are they just trying to subvert justice just for the heck of it? They just think it's fun? Or do they really have something to hide? 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Well, all the evidence isn't there yet, more will come out for sure

 

its obvious he was/is obstructing justice. The evidence is overwhelming. So, are they just trying to subvert justice just for the heck of it? They just think it's fun? Or do they really have something to hide? 

 

Has Meet The Press contacted you for an appearance on the show?  You'd fit right in with their merry band of political hacks and empty minded panels. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Well, all the evidence isn't there yet, more will come out for sure

 

its obvious he was/is obstructing justice. The evidence is overwhelming. So, are they just trying to subvert justice just for the heck of it? They just think it's fun? Or do they really have something to hide? 

Is "obstruction" a new way of spelling "collusion"?

Posted
30 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Well, all the evidence isn't there yet, more will come out for sure

 

its obvious he was/is obstructing justice. The evidence is overwhelming. So, are they just trying to subvert justice just for the heck of it? They just think it's fun? Or do they really have something to hide? 

 

Obvious to whom he was obstructing? The evidence is overwhelming? Didn't the President just come and say he will talk to Mueller?

 

You are nothing but a Trump hating shill. Everyone sees thru your stupid BS.

 

If there is Russian crap, it's more likely on the other side. I won't convict anyone till the EVIDENCE comes out, unlike an idiot like you.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...