Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I don't know about that.  It's possible that somewhere in the dark soul of the SC there is a voice of reason. "Wait, we have people losing their ;:/-ing minds over $89 worth of Russians facebook ads and discredited porn star attornies...now they want to drag me into this bogus story? What would this do to the country?".   

 

Also, it would work well with  DRs speculation that Mueller is working with DOJ and Trump. Same scenario, except "we gotta tamp this &$@# down hard, today." 

I also think it's possible that they intentionally let the media run with it all day, further exposing the bias and chipping away at their credibility.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, the truth sadly doesn't really matter.  I've got several rather intelligent friends that bring themselves to a lather discussing Trump's "obvious" treasons.  If the smart people bought in hook, line, & sinker, really not sure how this doesn't end up in a shooting war here.

 

Really hope Mueller is above board, because his giving a true & complete accounting (whatever that is) is the only way we might avoid a shooting war.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

Did Russia hack the AFC Championship?

 

Maybe not the AFC, but definitely the NFC. The Russian refs screwed the team in black in favor of the team in white. Since Trump is a well-known Russian agent, this is conclusive proof that Trump hates black people.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, So corrupt. With all the other news--Trump inspired distractions we forget this: 

Quote


 

President Trump was involved in discussions to build a skyscraper in Moscow throughout the entire 2016 presidential campaign, his personal lawyer said on Sunday, a longer and more significant role for Mr. Trump than he had previously acknowledged.

The comments by his lawyer [Giuliani] indicated that Mr. Trump’s efforts to complete a business deal in Russia waned only after Americans cast ballots in the presidential election.

The new timetable means that Mr. Trump was seeking a deal at the time he was calling for an end to economic sanctions against Russia imposed by the Obama administration. He was seeking a deal when he gave interviews questioning the legitimacy of NATO, a favorite talking point of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. And he was seeking a deal when, in July 2016, he called on Russia to release hacked Democratic emails that Mr. Putin’s government was rumored at the time to have stolen.

The Trump Tower Moscow discussions were “going on from the day I announced to the day I won,” Mr. Giuliani quoted Mr. Trump as saying during an interview with The New York Times.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/20/us/politics/trump-tower-moscow-cohen-giuliani.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

Not in any way illegal. But keep hoping that THIS time yo got him. :lol: 

:lol:

 

Keep laughing at what he did. Most level headed Americans will see this as total corruption, running foreign policy in a corrupt way and lying about it. 

 

It's also a key component of proving a quid pro quo existed ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Not in any way illegal. But keep hoping that THIS time yo got him. :lol: 

 

**************************************

 

Keep whistling through the graveyard

 

 

After three years, it's still............

 

Orange man bad, no matter what, all of us good - leftists

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

:lol:

 

Keep laughing at what he did. Most level headed Americans will see this as total corruption, running foreign policy in a corrupt way and lying about it. 

 

It's also a key component of proving a quid pro quo existed ?

 

It's only proof of a quid pro quo if you invent or ignore the actual policies enacted against Putin since Trump took over. If Trump is a Putin agent, he's a terrible one. 

 

You've got nothing. After two years, nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's only proof of a quid pro quo if you invent or ignore the actual policies enacted against Putin since Trump took over. If Trump is a Putin agent, he's a terrible one. 

 

You've got nothing. After two years, nothing. 

 

You should rephrase and say say they have had nothing since Trump came down that escalator.

 

If they ever have REAL NEWS against Trump, who is gonna believe it............. oh that's right, the leftist sheep will believe anything you throw out there against Trump.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...