Deranged Rhino Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Yes. By obtaining a TITLE I FISA on Carter Page. This gave the FBI/DOJ/USIC the ability to spy on ANYONE they wished who ever had or MAY have contact with Page without a warrant. That's why they wanted a FISA on a man who had already left the campaign, fukktard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Yes. By obtaining a TITLE I FISA on Carter Page. This gave the FBI/DOJ/USIC the ability to spy on ANYONE they wished who ever had or MAY have contact with Page without a warrant. That's why they wanted a FISA on a man who had already left the campaign, fukktard. So if they never really fired him and he was still a go between for Trump and Putin they would know. Interesting! That's why Trump is freaking out over this! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: So if they never really fired him and he was still a go between for Trump and Putin they would know. Interesting! That's why Trump is freaking out over this! Yeah, Trump is really quaking in his boots. No, the man is laughing his ass off at how stupid and resistant the Democratic Party is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Too bad he likely won't testify. Speaking for myself, I would love to see him on the stand, giggling away. Then I would like to see him answer Mueller's questions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Too bad he likely won't testify. Speaking for myself, I would love to see him on the stand, giggling away. Then I would like to see him answer Mueller's questions. The hate in you is strong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: The hate in you is strong. Naw, I just dislike you. It is not really hate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 25 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Too bad he likely won't testify. Speaking for myself, I would love to see him on the stand, giggling away. Then I would like to see him answer Mueller's questions. I don't get it..... With all this evidence of collusion you claim, why do we need him to testify about anything? Can't we just charge him and get it over with? Seems with months of recordings of phone, texts, and even conferences there has GOT to be enough to prove all of this amirite? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 14 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Naw, I just dislike you. It is not really hate You know what I hate? People who try to make a case for something on purely partisan reasons. Just now, Cinga said: I don't get it..... With all this evidence of collusion you claim, why do we need him to testify about anything? Can't we just charge him and get it over with? Seems with months of recordings of phone, texts, and even conferences there has GOT to be enough to prove all of this amirite? The partisan hacks are relegated to hoping that Trump slips up in some way whether it's intentional or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 55 minutes ago, Cinga said: I don't get it..... With all this evidence of collusion you claim, why do we need him to testify about anything? Can't we just charge him and get it over with? Seems with months of recordings of phone, texts, and even conferences there has GOT to be enough to prove all of this amirite? Because they want validation. It's the fundamental driving force of American liberal immaturity: validation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Grassley's memo is now (partially) unredacted... https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-06 CEG LG to DOJ FBI (Unclassified Steele Referral).pdf Here's the side-by-side redactions... hard to tell WHY the FBI didn't want this out: Read it. This is damning stuff. And we're STILL in the opening phase of this roll out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Grassley's memo is now (partially) unredacted... https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-06 CEG LG to DOJ FBI (Unclassified Steele Referral).pdf Here's the side-by-side redactions... hard to tell WHY the FBI didn't want this out: Read it. This is damning stuff. And we're STILL in the opening phase of this roll out. Wasn't someone around here saying something about frogs slowing getting their pot turned up to boiling? Looks like the water's heating up. As anticipated per your very consistent posting this past year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 10 hours ago, njbuff said: Yeah, Trump is really quaking in his boots. No, the man is laughing his ass off at how stupid and resistant the Democratic Party is. Yup, running around calling his opponents traitors for not properLy honoring him. Losing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, Tiberius said: Yup, running around calling his opponents traitors for not properLy honoring him. Losing it. As opposed to call them racists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Lots of new texts being released today. It appears Strock and Page are implicating 44. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 27 minutes ago, Nanker said: Lots of new texts being released today. It appears Strock and Page are implicating 44. Was wondering why Strzok hadn't been fired already... Looks like they want to keep him right where they can get their hands on him easy enough. Maybe he'll be the first to flip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: As opposed to call them racists That shoe fits, though. You don't get that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 11 minutes ago, Cinga said: Was wondering why Strzok hadn't been fired already... Looks like they want to keep him right where they can get their hands on him easy enough. Maybe he'll be the first to flip? Perhaps. I think it might make him more available for the IG and Congressional committees for interrogation. I mean questioning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 3 hours ago, Nanker said: Lots of new texts being released today. It appears Strock and Page are implicating 44. I'll edit your anecdote and make it a fact - One text released with zero context makes it appear Strzok and Page implicated 44. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/07/trump-mueller-russia-probe-395958 Trump's allies are trying to convince him to reach a compromise with Mueller. Quote Stone and at least two other people who regularly speak to Trump — Newsmax publisher Chris Ruddy and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich — are instead advising that the president offer Mueller a compromise of responding to questions in writing only. That’s the same deal President Ronald Reagan struck during the Iran-Contra investigation in 1987, multiple Trump allies noted in interviews. Trump's legal team is also interested in the possibility of a partial written exchange with Mueller, according to a source familiar with the White House's strategy. Whether Mueller would accept such an outcome is unclear. But it's one potential middle position between Trump’s public pledge to cooperate with the special counsel and fear among his lawyers and advisers that speaking to Mueller under oath could put him in serious legal jeopardy, particularly given his long track record of false and exaggerated claims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: That shoe fits, though. You don't get that? So disagreeing with a black person equate to racism? What are your thoughts on SC Senator Tim Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts