Cugalabanza Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: One of the areas we are in agreement on is with regards to Kushner. The more I've learned about him, the worse he becomes imo. Honestly, my position is not very well thought out. I just can’t stand the rich brat. I hugely resent that this idiot entitled son in law piece of crap has all this supposed influence (ostensibly at least) in our government and nobody’s allowed to ask the boy wonder any questions and whatever he’s working on is none of our business for some reason. plus, I trust my instincts here. He’s a douche. Edited January 25, 2018 by Cugalabanza 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 1 hour ago, Cugalabanza said: Here’s how I see this interview going... Mueller: We have a lot of embarrassing dirt. Somebody will have to be indicted here. Trump: Take the boy—take Jared. Mueller: Done. Wow. I mean...you really hate Jared. 1 hour ago, garybusey said: The memo is crap because Nunes is a political hack. Your posts are crap because you're a schmuck. Refute that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 2 hours ago, garybusey said: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/370595-house-intel-denied-senate-intel-committee-access-to-surveillance House Intel denied Senate Intel Committee access to surveillance memo: report The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee has reportedly denied Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr’s (R-N.C.) staff access to a classified memo detailing allegations of government surveillance abuse that is tied to the ongoing Russia election investigation. More evidence the memo is crap. Why wouldn't Nunes share this with Burr? because burr is an asshat dancing to the tune of a purple north carolina who has lost his moral compass in a political climate that is not supporting his fiber 1 hour ago, Cugalabanza said: Honestly, my position is not very well thought out. I just can’t stand the rich brat. I hugely resent that this idiot entitled son in law piece of crap has all this supposed influence (ostensibly at least) in our government and nobody’s allowed to ask the boy wonder any questions and whatever he’s working on is none of our business for some reason. plus, I trust my instincts here. He’s a douche. whats your opinion of chelsea clinton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 7 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: because burr is an asshat dancing to the tune of a purple north carolina who has lost his moral compass in a political climate that is not supporting his fiber whats your opinion of chelsea clinton? Chelsea seems pretty harmless to me. I have always found Hillary to be a little suspicious however. Not completely evil, but cutthroat when she wants to be, no question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 1 minute ago, Cugalabanza said: Chelsea seems pretty harmless to me. I have always found Hillary to be a little suspicious however. Not completely evil, but cutthroat when she wants to be, no question. so that chelsea had heavy influence on foreign policy, handled/manipulated the usage of the us military, and resources of the united states without any type of assignment to the government isn't an issue? kushner actually has a title for the government Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Don't worry, lambkins. She's going to have PLENTY of opportunities to testify under oath in the next few years. That is if she doesn't take the easy way out. You know, you should be right, but youre not. I m3an, what do the bookmakers have the odds at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 1 hour ago, Cugalabanza said: Chelsea seems pretty harmless to me. I have always found Hillary to be a little suspicious however. Not completely evil, but cutthroat when she wants to be, no question. Admiral Chelsea isn't harmless. She conquered Haiti after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 walter kirn @walterkirn 41m41 minutes ago More The Russia narrative is the political media's equivalent of a financial bubble. It's self-perpetuating, creates its own momentum, and runs on manic faith. Soon it will burst, I think, and its biggest investors will be wiped out Okay ............their excuses have reached the "hilarious" stage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 1 hour ago, Cugalabanza said: Chelsea seems pretty harmless to me. I have always found Hillary to be a little suspicious however. Not completely evil, but cutthroat when she wants to be, no question. Chelsea's probably the least harmless of the Clintons, given that she grew up immersed in their bull ****. I wouldn't trust her to know right from wrong, governance-wise, nor would I trust anyone to reign in her excesses. 10 minutes ago, B-Man said: walter kirn @walterkirn 41m41 minutes ago More The Russia narrative is the political media's equivalent of a financial bubble. It's self-perpetuating, creates its own momentum, and runs on manic faith. Soon it will burst, I think, and its biggest investors will be wiped out Okay ............their excuses have reached the "hilarious" stage "Stopped" the president by refusing to sign a joint statement? What the !@#$ is that Romper Room bull ****? Obama can't put his name to a statement without someone holding his hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Quote The Justice Department is urging the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, whose staff has compiled a secret memorandum purporting to show "shocking" political bias within the FBI, to give the department a chance to see the memo and warning that first sharing information from the memo with reporters would be "unprecedented" and dangerous. Furthermore, the department said certain allegations of impropriety are completely unfounded. https://www.yahoo.com/gma/doj-warns-house-intel-chairman-purported-secret-memo-000103551--abc-news-topstories.html I love the desperation. The FBI doesn't know what's in the memo, but they somehow know "certain" allegations against them are unfounded... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 29 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Chelsea's probably the least harmless of the Clintons, given that she grew up immersed in their bull ****. I wouldn't trust her to know right from wrong, governance-wise, nor would I trust anyone to reign in her excesses. "Stopped" the president by refusing to sign a joint statement? What the !@#$ is that Romper Room bull ****? Obama can't put his name to a statement without someone holding his hand? Re: Obama, sure he could. Paris accord and Iran nuke deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: Chelsea's probably the least harmless of the Clintons, given that she grew up immersed in their bull ****. I wouldn't trust her to know right from wrong, governance-wise, nor would I trust anyone to reign in her excesses. "Stopped" the president by refusing to sign a joint statement? What the !@#$ is that Romper Room bull ****? Obama can't put his name to a statement without someone holding his hand? Sadly, that was from the last administration's token "adult." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 He says he will testify under oath. But he lies constantly. Which is why why it would be great if he was und oath. He says says he will. But he lies constantly. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-says-he-would-speak-to-mueller-under-oath-in-russia-investigation/2018/01/24/edb33750-015a-11e8-8acf-ad2991367d9d_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumpmueller616pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.017d23364997 8 hours ago, Koko78 said: https://www.yahoo.com/gma/doj-warns-house-intel-chairman-purported-secret-memo-000103551--abc-news-topstories.html I love the desperation. The FBI doesn't know what's in the memo, but they somehow know "certain" allegations against them are unfounded... Desperation? Maybe exasperation at the partisan attacks upon an independent arm of our government. They dont need need to know exactly what's in the stupid memo to get the gist of what FBI is accused of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 14 hours ago, Cugalabanza said: I'm convinced now these !@#$s just don't want to do their jobs. It's more fun for them to just make accusations against the other side and then counter-accusations and call for more investigations. That's the real scandal, not that it's a surprise to anyone: Our legislators are lazy, foot-dragging, feces-throwing, vindictive idealogue !@#$s. We just have to come up with a catchy name for this scandal. Let's see...I don't know... "Investi-GATE!" Gringo, Congress works in real time. You act like you’re binge watching a series on Netfllix. The script is being written as we watch. It takes time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 26 minutes ago, Nanker said: Gringo, Congress works in real time. You act like you’re binge watching a series on Netfllix. The script is being written as we watch. It takes time. Maybe but Greggy's memo is no more going to see the light of day than the underlying Hollywood stuff that looked like it was about to blow. They will use massive quantities of distraction techniques to tire people which are akin to the Aziz Ansari thing. Meanwhile the major culprits skate. Heck, Oprah and Meryl even get to paint themselves as heroes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Quick reminder: Charlie Kirk ✔ @charliekirk11 Hillary's emails -- deleted/"lost" FBI's text messages -- deleted/"lost" NSA's emails -- deleted/"lost IRS emails -- deleted/"lost" Just imagine what the left would do if @DonaldJTrumpJr said he "lost" his emails during testimony 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Quick reminder: Charlie Kirk ✔ @charliekirk11 Hillary's emails -- deleted/"lost" FBI's text messages -- deleted/"lost" NSA's emails -- deleted/"lost IRS emails -- deleted/"lost" Just imagine what the left would do if @DonaldJTrumpJr said he "lost" his emails during testimony Me doing a little research............ I found out that Democratic Presidents don't attacked anywhere near the rate Republican ones do. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 ´Hide the ball´ — On Capitol Hill, growing frustration with FBI secrecy by Byron York Original Article Bob Mueller’s elephant and the media blind men by Editorial Original Article . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts