DC Tom Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Neither's speeches were televised by the candidates. They both gave speeches; the media choose to televise Trump's whenever he gave them, helping his campaign get his message out. They didn't do the same with Clinton whenever she gave a speech. Thus the free publicity for Trump, and again, showing they didn't give Clinton preferential treatment. Just the opposite. "Tell us more..."
GoBills808 Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 willing to roll the Dice, over and over again, to not have to witness DJT make us looks like idiots. Liiiiiiiitle too late for that one
DC Tom Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Just want to interject a moment with this reminder: Comey did deserve to be fired. There were good, non-partisan reasons to get rid of him. So how !@#$ed up does that make this whole situation?
row_33 Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Just want to interject a moment with this reminder: Comey did deserve to be fired. There were good, non-partisan reasons to get rid of him. So how !@#$ed up does that make this whole situation? when you do a favour for the Clintons you pay for it with your career or life... run, flee from them!!!
Foxx Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 with Seth Rich in mind... i wonder how many people have to die before it comes to Hillary being sworn in?
DC Tom Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 with Seth Rich in mind... i wonder how many people have to die before it comes to Hillary being sworn in? At least a basket-full.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 with Seth Rich in mind... i wonder how many people have to die before it comes to Hillary being sworn in? Lesson One: Worry about the body counts AFTER a Clinton gets elected.
Chef Jim Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Neither's speeches were televised by the candidates. They both gave speeches; the media choose to televise Trump's whenever he gave them, helping his campaign get his message out. They didn't do the same with Clinton whenever she gave a speech. Thus the free publicity for Trump, and again, showing they didn't give Clinton preferential treatment. Just the opposite. Why do you think it played out that way?
Doc Brown Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Neither's speeches were televised by the candidates. They both gave speeches; the media choose to televise Trump's whenever he gave them, helping his campaign get his message out. They didn't do the same with Clinton whenever she gave a speech. Thus the free publicity for Trump, and again, showing they didn't give Clinton preferential treatment. Just the opposite. Oh yeah. The media networks knew the best ratings would be Trump and Clinton. Ignore crazy Bernie and lyin' Ted.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Oh yeah. The media networks knew the best ratings would be Trump and Clinton. Ignore crazy Bernie and lyin' Ted. I'd think any sincere progressive would be more worked over by the DNC than trump.
GoBills808 Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 I'd think any sincere progressive would be more worked over by the DNC than trump. Most were.
Doc Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Just want to interject a moment with this reminder: Comey did deserve to be fired. There were good, non-partisan reasons to get rid of him. So how !@#$ed up does that make this whole situation? That's politics for you.
Foxx Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Lesson One: Worry about the body counts AFTER a Clinton gets elected. oh that's right, Mr. Rich was a robbery victim. my bad. move along, nothing to see here...
PastaJoe Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Why do you think it played out that way? Trump's undisciplined style attracted viewers who wanted to see what outrageous thing he said next. Ratings over responsible reporting.
Chef Jim Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Trump's undisciplined style attracted viewers who wanted to see what outrageous thing he said next. Ratings over responsible reporting. Or the the networks were giving him enough rope? Either that or Hillary was locked up in her bunker busy preparing her victory party and wasn't as visible as Trump. Or a combination thereof.
B-Large Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Or the the networks were giving him enough rope? Either that or Hillary was locked up in her bunker busy preparing her victory party and wasn't as visible as Trump. Or a combination thereof. or you ignore the forgotten part of America and trot our celebrities throughout the campaign because its in the bag..... people love celebrity dance parties when they cant find gainful employment.
BringBackOrton Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Pasta and gator counting their chickens early only to end up with egg on their face, part two.
reddogblitz Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Dow drops 250 points, S&P and Nasdaq fall 1% as Trump worries send shivers down Wall Street Bad news is good news when your candidate loses.
DC Tom Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Trump's undisciplined style attracted viewers who wanted to see what outrageous thing he said next. Ratings over responsible reporting. They gave Trump preferential treatment by putting his idiocy on display? Please...go on...
Recommended Posts