Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

MG was a big loss for this team.

He's A Loss... but the fact we're doing nothing about it is troublesome. It's not like we can say Mc D saw enough of J.Will last year, none of us saw enough to instill confidence. Could he be the answer for #2 RB, sure. I'd rather he compete for that title and that competition is weak as of right now.

Edited by Eric Moulds on my A**
Posted

He's A Loss... but the fact we're doing nothing about it is troublesome. It's not like we can say Mc D saw enough of J.Will last year, none of us saw enough to instill confidence. Could he be the answer for #2 RB, sure. I'd rather he compete for that title and that competition is weak as of right now.

Yep. Big trouble if McCoy gets hurts, and with his history, he won't play all 16 games.

Posted

sorry but as much as i liked td mike he simply was not anything resembling a feature back. thus hes quite replaceable at significantly less than the cheaters paid

 

when you have players all over the roster playing for less money to get a chance at drinking from marshas magic ring fountain you can overplay role players like that

 

bills certainly dont have that luxury, especially at backup rb, when you can now find guys at the fry station for that job

 

there will be loads of rbs available all through camp. im sure the bills will latch onto one. plus they still have not karlos williams

Posted

This guy must suck because everyone gives up on him. He was one of my starting rbs in fantasy and Seattle just cut him.

 

Also, there are so many young rbs why would you sign a pricey vet? Always go younger on RB unless it's a freak like Adrian Peterson.

 

..opportunities with Seahawks, Dallas, back to Seahawks and Pack all blown...they're hardly bottom feeders...something isn't passing the smell test with this guy............

Posted

Because Jonathan Williams, 2 FBs and an UDFA bring confidence for you?

 

no.

 

no because there's no reason to believe a guy who's been cut five times in four years should.

Posted

We drafted the replacement last year and brought in Tolbert.

 

Also it was a deep RB draft and we got a promising udfa

 

i would rather see a veteran safety brought in

We drafted a guy who stunk last year in a limited role.

Posted

 

no.

 

no because there's no reason to believe a guy who's been cut five times in four years should.

And yet a Genius football mind in BB made it a priority to bring him in a week after being dropped, even after rostering James White, Dion Lewis, Rex Burkhead and Gilly?!

Hmmmm... listen to Big Bill or a Big P***y (cat).

Quite the dilemma.

Posted

And yet a Genius football mind in BB made it a priority to bring him in a week after being dropped, even after rostering James White, Dion Lewis, Rex Burkhead and Gilly?!

Hmmmm... listen to Big Bill or a Big P***y (cat).

Quite the dilemma.

 

right

 

anyways

Posted

 

right

 

anyways

You must be a riot at dinner parties. Likely the center of attention for stimulating conversation.

 

I can understand not liking the player in question but absolutely dismissing the idea that this could be beneficial to our weak RB group is ignorant at best. I'm not saying that Michael is the next Shady, he's not. I will say he'd challenge J.Will for that #2 spot and when training camp is competitive at all positions we can assure that no one is simply handed their spot on this team.

×
×
  • Create New...