CNY315 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) We still have the other 3rd right? Edited April 28, 2017 by CNY315
CanadianFan Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 OMG so stoked, this guy is A.J. Green clone, I am sooooo happy right now Sure hands. I like that. I hope he earns Tyrod's *TRUST*
K D Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Did we need a solid #2 WR? Would he have been there at 44? Lots of good WR left. Why give up that extra 3rd? What a dummy
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Whaley didn't learn his lesson about trading up in round 2. Was that necessary? Yes it was he would be gone at 44
The Wiz Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Did we trade our 3rd round picks for this?only pick 91 we got from kc. They kept pick 75.
Iverwig Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Great pickup for the Bills. Comes from NFL stock too.
BillsFanForever19 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 damn, I thought they said our 5th Yeah, where is this 3rd and 4th switch coming from? NFL Network said we gave up the 3rd of our 3 5th Round picks.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 W O W I do need someone to throw to when Sammy is on injured list
SoCal Deek Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Gilmore...out Tre Davious...in Woods...out Zay ....in The next pick must be to replace Gillislee or Robey.
26CornerBlitz Posted April 28, 2017 Author Posted April 28, 2017 We still have the other 3rd right? Yep, still have #75. They gave up 44 and 91 to get 37 and 149.
nucci Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Whaley didn't learn his lesson about trading up in round 2. Was that necessary? You never agree with anything. They could trade for Aaron Rodgers and you would find something wrong
Real McClappy Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Lots of good WR left. Why give up that extra 3rd? What a dummy Got a 4th back and a solid ass WR that would not have made it to 44, hence why we traded up. Relax before name calling like a child.
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 The Bills lacked a fourth-round pick entering tonight but received one (No. 149) from the Rams in their trade. Buffalo got picks No. 37 and 149 and gave up No. 44 and No. 91 (third round). I can live with that. We moved up and swapped a late third for a fourth
Big C Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Whaley didn't learn his lesson about trading up in round 2. Was that necessary? We still haven't seen Reggie play!
Real McClappy Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) Gilmore...out Tre Davious...in Woods...out Zay ....in The next pick must be to replace Gillislee or Robey. Actually hoping it's a safety, RB can wait and Whaley loves the 5th rd gems for that. Edited April 28, 2017 by Real McCoy
Maynard Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Yes it was he would be gone at 44 Ditto. Best WR available IMO. Would have been gone by 44 I'd wager.
buffaloboyinATL Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Did we need a solid #2 WR? Would he have been there at 44?i think so. And if you really want the guy, don't risk it, go get him.
sodbuster Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Seems like they're targeting players who showed consistent production throughout their college careers.
Recommended Posts