Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 446
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
  On 4/28/2017 at 11:40 PM, voodoo poonani said:

Not melting down, but there would have been WRs there at 44. No need to trade up. Don't hate the player though.

But obviously the Bills wanted this guy

Posted (edited)
  On 4/28/2017 at 11:42 PM, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

What did the Bills give up

 

Buffalo got picks No. 37 and 149 and gave up No. 44 and No. 91 (third round).

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted
  On 4/28/2017 at 11:44 PM, kdiggz said:

Whaley didn't learn his lesson about trading up in round 2. Was that necessary?

Did we need a solid #2 WR? Would he have been there at 44?

Posted
  On 4/28/2017 at 11:40 PM, matter2003 said:

Robert Woods 2.0 except potentially better

Is he #$#@%@% crazier?

×
×
  • Create New...