Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, GG said:

Talk about a high powered diversion strategy.  After all, he's the 7th ranked prospect on their BOARD.    Can you imagine who'll they'll send to see the guys rated higher? 

 

...EXACTLY what it is.....beer is cold and cheap as well as the popcorn....sneaky SOB's..................

Posted
1 hour ago, GG said:

Talk about a high powered diversion strategy.  After all, he's the 7th ranked prospect on their BOARD.    Can you imagine who'll they'll send to see the guys rated higher? 

 

I hear it’s pretty nippy in WNY these days! What a great time to go scout in FL! 

 

My college used to send a contingent of staff down to Florida to do alumni fund raising every winter. You know, between tee times. :)

 

I give them credit for being smart here. 

Posted
7 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Per inside sources no doubt. :lol:

 

DD :flirt:

 

 

4 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

I guess no Luke Falk tonight? Is he injured or just sitting this one out in favor of the draft?

 

He didn't want more evidence to lower his draft stock.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
On ‎12‎/‎23‎/‎2017 at 10:46 AM, Buffalo30 said:

I can't wait for the combine/interview process for these guys.  The wonderlic is definitely something that should be looked at for a guy like Allen who wasn't a top prospect coming out of high school.  He shows great competitive spirit but that's something that can really help or hurt him.  We should be looking for a guy with a high wonderlic score, no doubt.

Yeah like a guy from Harvard with the highest Wonderlic score ever. Fitzmagic. LOL

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, buffalobloodfloridahome said:

Yeah like a guy from Harvard with the highest Wonderlic score ever. Fitzmagic. LOL

It certainly helps.  You don't want a guy with a low wonderlic score.  Not every high score is going to turn out to be great but not many low scores turn out great.  It's another measure to look at in the scouting process.  Make fun of it all you want but it's somthing to look at if you are really scouting a QB

Edited by Buffalo30
Posted
32 minutes ago, buffalobloodfloridahome said:

Yeah like a guy from Harvard with the highest Wonderlic score ever. Fitzmagic. LOL

Fitz' problem is that his arm strength is not really NFL caliber.  If he had better arm strength, he would be a pretty good NFL QB, IMHO.

Posted
14 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

That’s what I’d like to know

 

 

Falk, who was spotted wearing a cast over his left wrist and hand this week, warmed up in uniform before Thursday's game but appeared limited. He has completed 66.9 percent of his throws (357-for-534) for 3,593 yards, 30 touchdowns and 13 interceptions.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Buffalo30 said:

It certainly helps.  You don't want a guy with a low wonderlic score.  Not every high score is going to turn out to be great but not many low scores turn out great.  It's another measure to look at in the scouting process.  Make fun of it all you want but it's somthing to look at if you are really scouting a QB

 

I agree we don't want a dummy in at QB or a guy who thinks his physical talents are all he needs. Nobody wants a Jamarcus Russell. I don't know how a wonderlic score actually translates into anything beyond normal intelligence. I want a guy with football intelligence that can read a defense and adjust to what's in front of him and know where his players are gonna be and who according to the defense will be open. I know that it takes time to adjust to the pro game and nobody comes out with all of those abilities. Plus defenses have become better at cloaking their plays now. I can dream can't I.

Posted
2 hours ago, buffalobloodfloridahome said:

Yeah like a guy from Harvard with the highest Wonderlic score ever. Fitzmagic. LOL

I know people like to laugh at him but Fitz had a better career (made more money) than 90% of Qbs drafted.

 

And I like Rosen even more after watching how terrible UCLA is.

 

Rosen

Darnold

Rudolph

Mayfield (could change if he performs in the playoff)

Jackson

 

 

 

Allen

Posted
1 hour ago, buffalobloodfloridahome said:

 

I agree we don't want a dummy in at QB or a guy who thinks his physical talents are all he needs. Nobody wants a Jamarcus Russell. I don't know how a wonderlic score actually translates into anything beyond normal intelligence. I want a guy with football intelligence that can read a defense and adjust to what's in front of him and know where his players are gonna be and who according to the defense will be open. I know that it takes time to adjust to the pro game and nobody comes out with all of those abilities. Plus defenses have become better at cloaking their plays now. I can dream can't I.

Like I said, it's just a piece of the scouting puzzle.

Posted

I am very happy that they killed the drought, but with yesterday's win I am starting to think that they are out of range for a good QB prospect in round 1.  I haven't watched the prospects enough yet, but as of now, I would not trade both 1st round picks to move up for any of the prospects other than Rosen, Mayfield or Darnold.  They don't have the ammo to get Rosen and Darnold has been shaky.  I expect Mayfield to be gone in the top15 as well.

 

Start looking at the second/third group of QBs - and I now kind of expect Taylor back for next season.

 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...