PrimeTime101 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 So Tackle Cam Robinson is available at round 2. Should we move to get him or take BPA at 44? Getting a CB and Tackle fills our needs at those positions and get WR in the third. Thoughts?
Buffalo86 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Depends on what we have to give up. I might be inclined to spend less on Dion Dawkins in the hopes that he's the answer to our RT woes.
PrimeTime101 Posted April 28, 2017 Author Posted April 28, 2017 Depends on what we have to give up. I might be inclined to spend less on Dion Dawkins in the hopes that he's the answer to our RT woes. I think there is a decent gap in talent between the 2. I want to move down again get more picks And I think that's fair to say... But Cam Robinson is round 1 talent yes?
Mountain Man Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 I like Robinson, but I wouldn't trade up. If he falls, great but he isn't standout enough to trade up for
PrimeTime101 Posted April 28, 2017 Author Posted April 28, 2017 I like Robinson, but I wouldn't trade up. If he falls, great but he isn't standout enough to trade up for no? many draft boards had him go as low as Indy at 15. not to say there right but.. just saying
YoloinOhio Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Would be a very solid pick imo. Had a bit of trouble in college - arrested for guns and drugs last year. Just pointing out because of McD.
PrimeTime101 Posted April 28, 2017 Author Posted April 28, 2017 Would be a very solid pick imo. Had a bit of trouble in college - arrested for guns and drugs last year. Just pointing out because of McD. yes that was 2 years ago and has proven he is above all that now.
YoloinOhio Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) yes that was 2 years ago and has proven he is above all that now.the arrest was less than one year ago.https://www.google.com/amp/amp.al.com/v1/articles/18592770/alabama_lt_cam_robinson_charge.amp Edited April 28, 2017 by YoloinOhio
Bronxbomber21 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Would like Cam Robinson but McDermott like wouldn't select a guy with an off the field problem
PrimeTime101 Posted April 28, 2017 Author Posted April 28, 2017 Would like Cam Robinson but McDermott like wouldn't select a guy with an off the field problem the arrest was less than one year ago. https://www.google.com/amp/amp.al.com/v1/articles/18592770/alabama_lt_cam_robinson_charge.amp I think you 2 don't have all the facts So I will enlighten you.. #1 Facts in the case show that rear passenger admitted to shoving the drugs and guns under the driver Side seat #2 Both football players were drug tested and clean. #3 In the article in the same paragraph it says.. "When approaching the vehicle, officers spotted a handgun on the lap of the passenger. A bag of marijuana was also observed on the driver's side floorboard. The stolen handgun was located under Robinson's seat." IF the police officer actually saw the handgun on lap of passenger then game over.. the gun is in possession of passenger not the driver Cam Robinson. the guilt was by association and nothing more.. all charges were dropped. Some times in life stuff happens when were not in fault. I think this was the case.
Blokestradamus Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 I think there is a decent gap in talent between the 2. There is a gap with Dawkins being the better player.
Big Gun Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) What time does round 2 start? Edited April 28, 2017 by old school
Prop Joe Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 I think you 2 don't have all the facts So I will enlighten you.. #1 Facts in the case show that rear passenger admitted to shoving the drugs and guns under the driver Side seat #2 Both football players were drug tested and clean. #3 In the article in the same paragraph it says.. "When approaching the vehicle, officers spotted a handgun on the lap of the passenger. A bag of marijuana was also observed on the driver's side floorboard. The stolen handgun was located under Robinson's seat." IF the police officer actually saw the handgun on lap of passenger then game over.. the gun is in possession of passenger not the driver Cam Robinson. the guilt was by association and nothing more.. all charges were dropped. Some times in life stuff happens when were not in fault. I think this was the case. gangbanger, no thanks
BuffaloSol Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 I think you 2 don't have all the facts So I will enlighten you.. #1 Facts in the case show that rear passenger admitted to shoving the drugs and guns under the driver Side seat #2 Both football players were drug tested and clean. #3 In the article in the same paragraph it says.. "When approaching the vehicle, officers spotted a handgun on the lap of the passenger. A bag of marijuana was also observed on the driver's side floorboard. The stolen handgun was located under Robinson's seat." IF the police officer actually saw the handgun on lap of passenger then game over.. the gun is in possession of passenger not the driver Cam Robinson. the guilt was by association and nothing more.. all charges were dropped. Some times in life stuff happens when were not in fault. I think this was the case. Oh yeah not that bad he probably had no clue the guy had a stolen gun and drugs. No responsibility needed.
Ramza86 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Hmm. Doenst GB need linemen? and I heard they are getting about a million phone calls for that 33rd pick.
Billy Zabka Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 I'd love to get Robinson in the 2nd and WR Carlos Henderson in the 3rd. Doubtful Robinson is there, but Bama players are dropping this year.
BigBuff423 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 I think you 2 don't have all the facts So I will enlighten you.. #1 Facts in the case show that rear passenger admitted to shoving the drugs and guns under the driver Side seat #2 Both football players were drug tested and clean. #3 In the article in the same paragraph it says.. "When approaching the vehicle, officers spotted a handgun on the lap of the passenger. A bag of marijuana was also observed on the driver's side floorboard. The stolen handgun was located under Robinson's seat." IF the police officer actually saw the handgun on lap of passenger then game over.. the gun is in possession of passenger not the driver Cam Robinson. the guilt was by association and nothing more.. all charges were dropped. Some times in life stuff happens when were not in fault. I think this was the case. I'm sorry, but I don't buy that....I've never admitted this openly but my life is about to change drastically so it won't really matter in about a month. But I work in a law enforcement "branch" in New York, and I can tell you I had one investigation where a vehicle was pulled over, the passenger bailed and ran, the driver stayed put and was arrested. Passenger was eventually caught, the car was searched and a loaded handgun was found under the passenger's seat. No one took responsibility as they both pointed to the other. Obviously, it couldn't belong to both of them, but one got 10 years in prison and one got 8 years in prison.....for the same gun....for the same crime. The law is not as clear cut as you think....furthermore, in NY at least the idea of constructive possession can be applied under a variety of circumstances, and if the gun was out in the open for the officer to observe, then Mr. Robinson knew the gun was in the car....to make my point one more time, I've had a number of narcotics investigations where it was known and proved a man and woman, usually boyfriend / girlfriend or husband / wife, were residing in a home together and the man was selling the drugs. The female never exited the house, and she was never recorded as making the transactions, but because it occurred out of the home, she was charged and convicted as well, because she knew it was occurring and was thought to be guilty, but not *as* guilty so she received Probation while he was sent to jail / prison, depending on the case.....it's happened quite a bit. I said all of that to say, you're making assumptions that are both factually and legally inaccurate.
Recommended Posts