likei've Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Can't wait to see the whiners at this same time next year. Especially if Mahomes stars at some point next year.
Augie Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 We could've gotten more IMO I suspect they looked around. And took the best deal. And I love it.
Playoffs? Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 I hate this more and more. If KC sucked, it might be a different story, but KC will be decent enough to make that 1st rounder in '18 unattractive. The Bills are also admitting that they're going to (try to) suck in '17.
34-78-83 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Who needs quality starters? Fail. Didn't even get this years second Value chart shows we should make out in this deal. Pair that with many scouts saying not much difference between the 15th pick and the 50th on talent this year. We shall see but I really like 2 1sts next year.
dave mcbride Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 We won the trade points wise. Why the bicthing? Great move. Whaley's best to date. Look at the other trade. Also, there is the other issue of a truly elite cb and te being available.
What a Tuel Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 It's a bad trade. Just compare it to what sf got. That was a bad trade itself. SF had the Chicago at a ransom. They said we draft Trubisky or you tell us what you'll give us for him. You shouldn't compare the two at all.
biggerdaddynj Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 There's not much talent drop off from 10 to 27 this year. Bills positioning themselves well for next year in case Tyrod flames out. That's why it's unrealistic to think we could have gotten more. Please remember that before you have s stroke. With the extra third we can get a zone CB and maybe the luxury of a good TE too or a RT) and at 27 we can get the WLB we need. Next year we will have TWO first rounders and even one of them should get us a QB who is AT LEAST as good as this year's crop. If we package the two firsts who knows how great it might be.
par73 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Yes, but Darnold is going to be big time. I don't know if two first round picks will be enough to move into the number one overall pick. No one is going to give up that number one pick next year imo. Throw in a 2nd and the 2019 1st rounder.
Paulus Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 It's a bad trade. Just compare it to what sf got. I think the 3rd should have been changed to a second. Look at how late the pick is. It is at the end of the round, and I don't see the Chiefs getting anything lower than at lest a 20th pick next year. Boo!
CodeMonkey Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Writing off this season and getting ready for 2018 and beyond.
dave mcbride Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Gotta drop next year's a round Yup - by a lot. Thank you.
billieve420 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Bills (#27, 91 and 1st rd in 2018) got the better deal in #NFLDraft trade w Chiefs (#10) by getting 36.1 draft points & losing 19.9. KC was desperate for a QB and the Bills should have squeezed them for another pick. If we also received another 2nd or 3rd in 2018 I wouldn't have minded dropping so far.
DriveFor1Outta5 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 It a great starting point -- both 1st rd picks next year and 2019 = DoNE Fair enough, but if you're the team in the number one spot next year why would you give it up? Teams that draft number one overall need a QB. You wouldn't give it up for anything. When Andrew Luck was drafted I doubt that the Colts would have traded down for anything. Nothing is more valuable than a franchise QB.
Yav Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 It's a bad trade. Just compare it to what sf got. No considering KC reached for a QB, it makes the trade even better. With two first next year the Bills have ammo to move up next year to get the QB they really want. Great trade.
CEN-CAL17 Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Who knows .... KCs ick could be a top 10 pick next year
starrymessenger Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 I am shocked at the reaction. I would have done this trade for even a 2nd next year. They get two 1sts and a 3rd. This is terrific. They gave up a first. A much better one.
NoSaint Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Look at the other trade. Also, there is the other issue of a truly elite cb and te being available. Trading to 2 is a different beast
GG Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 The NFL trade value chart: http://walterfootball.com/draftchart.php 10th pick value is 1,300. KC 27th 680, 91st 136. 2018 1st 590 (minimum) value is 1,406. Good trade that favors the Bills. You're not discounting the time value of next yr's 1st rounder. It's not worth the same as in this draft
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 28, 2017 Posted April 28, 2017 Would have liked a second though but will take two firsts. Coach must have read my thread about trading for 1 next year
Recommended Posts