Sal Capaccio Bills Targets

[Ittakestime]

Not sure who heard Sal today, but he pretty much confirmed the names everyone else has been saying the Bills are targeting. His order:

 

1. Adams

2. Hooker

3. Howard

4. Reddick

5. Williams

 

I think there is a very little chance all are taken before 10, so it seems one of them will be a Bill tomorrow.

 

 

[jeffismagic]

  On 4/26/2017 at 11:52 PM, Ittakestime said:

Not sure who heard Sal today, but he pretty much confirmed the names everyone else has been saying the Bills are targeting. His order:

 

1. Adams

2. Hooker

3. Howard

4. Reddick

5. Williams

 

I think there is a very little chance all are taken before 10, so it seems one of them will be a Bill tomorrow.

 

 

 

Gross.

[DC Tom]

  On 4/26/2017 at 11:52 PM, Ittakestime said:

Not sure who heard Sal today, but he pretty much confirmed the names everyone else has been saying the Bills are targeting. His order:

 

1. Adams

2. Hooker

3. Howard

4. Reddick

5. Williams

 

I think there is a very little chance all are taken before 10, so it seems one of them will be a Bill tomorrow.

 

 

 

I hope it's Williams. Between losing Mario, Karlos, and Aaron, we're running a serious Williams deficit.

[Bangarang]

  On 4/26/2017 at 11:53 PM, jeffismagic said:

 

Gross.

Mahomes or bust?

[PIZ]

I like 1, 2, and 4. Would like to see a QB in 3 and 5.

[Augie]

  On 4/26/2017 at 11:54 PM, DC Tom said:

I hope it's Williams. Between losing Mario, Karlos, and Aaron, we're running a serious Williams deficit.

It's one thing to corner the market, but it's tough to keep that edge when the competition knows your plan.

[VaMilBill]

I like all names but Howard. Howard will be a bust. You heard it here first. But seriously, you gotta wonder why Howard produced so little at Bama besides being wide open in both championship games.

 

I really like Adams and Reddick.

 

Personally, I'm glad QB isn't on that list. I would take a QB in the second

Edited April 26, 2017 by VaMilBill

[jr1]

there are only 2 Williams cousins on the team. This had to be intentional to go with the "new era" theme

[jeffismagic]

Jamal Adams fine. If Hooker can be cleared medically fine.

 

I like Mike Williams. But someone will have to explain how we spend 3 #1 picks on WR in a short period with no QB. Seriously.

 

Howard. Looks like Tarzan. But the high upside also brings a projection. How does he translate to NFL as a weapon when teams try to take him away? So I like the prospect but think 10 is rich and again, why for Buffalo? No QB. If you want a blocking TE pick one up at camp cuts.

 

Reddick. Another projection. His pass rush stuff is useless for where he would play in Buffalo so do you spend a top ten pick on a OLB projection? No thanks.

  On 4/26/2017 at 11:57 PM, Bangarang said:

Mahomes or bust?

 

No more passing on QB's with franchise potential.

[Watkins_deep]

Reddick is another bennett/ von miller. Hes the same size and athlete. Peterman rd 2

[Domdab99]

  On 4/26/2017 at 11:52 PM, Ittakestime said:

Not sure who heard Sal today, but he pretty much confirmed the names everyone else has been saying the Bills are targeting. His order:

 

1. Adams

2. Hooker

3. Howard

4. Reddick

5. Williams

 

I think there is a very little chance all are taken before 10, so it seems one of them will be a Bill tomorrow.

 

 

 

I'd be thrilled with 1-4. 5 is meh but okay.

[Beef Jerky]

The Bills re trading down with the Giants if Howard is on the board.

[Hurricane]

Reddick in the 1st

Db in round 2..

[Augie]

  On 4/26/2017 at 11:58 PM, VaMilBill said:

I like all names but Howard. Howard will be a bust. You heard it here first. But seriously, you gotta wonder why Howard produced so little at Bama besides being wide open in both championship games.

I really like Adams and Reddick.

Personally, I'm glad QB isn't on that list. I would take a QB in the second

Produced so little? So....being wide open and not getting the ball is his fault? I actually LIKE guys who get wide open. Lane Kiffen is a nut job now at a podunk school, they are a running team, and they had a young QB. Oh, and he tore up the field in their National Championship, as I recall.

[CNY315]

Reddick please

[LABILLBACKER]

  On 4/26/2017 at 11:58 PM, VaMilBill said:

I like all names but Howard. Howard will be a bust. You heard it here first. But seriously, you gotta wonder why Howard produced so little at Bama besides being wide open in both championship games.

 

I really like Adams and Reddick.

 

Personally, I'm glad QB isn't on that list. I would take a QB in the second

Agreed. Adams and Reddick would substantially boost our defense. But we do need a #2 we so Williams or Davis would work too...hoping for a trade down...

[BillsFan17]

Bills apparently aren't taking a QB in the first according to John Wawrow

[KellyToughII]

My hope would be able to trade down a few spots then take anyone on that list, and I think we can.

[VaMilBill]

  On 4/27/2017 at 12:03 AM, Augie said:

Produced so little? So....being wide open and not getting the ball is his fault? I actually LIKE guys who get wide open. Lane Kiffen is a nut job now at a podunk school, they are a running team, and they had a young QB. Oh, and he tore up the field in their National Championship, as I recall.

He was left uncovered completely on two TDs in the first championship and left uncovered again this past championship for a TD. Blown coverages. Besides that he was mediocre. I don't count being left uncovered as something that will translate to the NFL.

Edited April 27, 2017 by VaMilBill

[KellyToughII]

  On 4/27/2017 at 12:14 AM, BillsFan17 said:

Bills apparently aren't taking a QB in the first according to John Wawrow

I want Peterman in the 2nd