Ittakestime Posted April 26, 2017 Posted April 26, 2017 Not sure who heard Sal today, but he pretty much confirmed the names everyone else has been saying the Bills are targeting. His order: 1. Adams 2. Hooker 3. Howard 4. Reddick 5. Williams I think there is a very little chance all are taken before 10, so it seems one of them will be a Bill tomorrow.
jeffismagic Posted April 26, 2017 Posted April 26, 2017 Not sure who heard Sal today, but he pretty much confirmed the names everyone else has been saying the Bills are targeting. His order: 1. Adams 2. Hooker 3. Howard 4. Reddick 5. Williams I think there is a very little chance all are taken before 10, so it seems one of them will be a Bill tomorrow. Gross.
DC Tom Posted April 26, 2017 Posted April 26, 2017 Not sure who heard Sal today, but he pretty much confirmed the names everyone else has been saying the Bills are targeting. His order: 1. Adams 2. Hooker 3. Howard 4. Reddick 5. Williams I think there is a very little chance all are taken before 10, so it seems one of them will be a Bill tomorrow. I hope it's Williams. Between losing Mario, Karlos, and Aaron, we're running a serious Williams deficit.
PIZ Posted April 26, 2017 Posted April 26, 2017 I like 1, 2, and 4. Would like to see a QB in 3 and 5.
Augie Posted April 26, 2017 Posted April 26, 2017 I hope it's Williams. Between losing Mario, Karlos, and Aaron, we're running a serious Williams deficit. It's one thing to corner the market, but it's tough to keep that edge when the competition knows your plan.
VaMilBill Posted April 26, 2017 Posted April 26, 2017 (edited) I like all names but Howard. Howard will be a bust. You heard it here first. But seriously, you gotta wonder why Howard produced so little at Bama besides being wide open in both championship games. I really like Adams and Reddick. Personally, I'm glad QB isn't on that list. I would take a QB in the second Edited April 26, 2017 by VaMilBill
jr1 Posted April 26, 2017 Posted April 26, 2017 there are only 2 Williams cousins on the team. This had to be intentional to go with the "new era" theme
jeffismagic Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 Jamal Adams fine. If Hooker can be cleared medically fine. I like Mike Williams. But someone will have to explain how we spend 3 #1 picks on WR in a short period with no QB. Seriously. Howard. Looks like Tarzan. But the high upside also brings a projection. How does he translate to NFL as a weapon when teams try to take him away? So I like the prospect but think 10 is rich and again, why for Buffalo? No QB. If you want a blocking TE pick one up at camp cuts. Reddick. Another projection. His pass rush stuff is useless for where he would play in Buffalo so do you spend a top ten pick on a OLB projection? No thanks. Mahomes or bust? No more passing on QB's with franchise potential.
Watkins_deep Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 Reddick is another bennett/ von miller. Hes the same size and athlete. Peterman rd 2
Domdab99 Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 Not sure who heard Sal today, but he pretty much confirmed the names everyone else has been saying the Bills are targeting. His order: 1. Adams 2. Hooker 3. Howard 4. Reddick 5. Williams I think there is a very little chance all are taken before 10, so it seems one of them will be a Bill tomorrow. I'd be thrilled with 1-4. 5 is meh but okay.
Beef Jerky Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 The Bills re trading down with the Giants if Howard is on the board.
Augie Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 I like all names but Howard. Howard will be a bust. You heard it here first. But seriously, you gotta wonder why Howard produced so little at Bama besides being wide open in both championship games. I really like Adams and Reddick. Personally, I'm glad QB isn't on that list. I would take a QB in the second Produced so little? So....being wide open and not getting the ball is his fault? I actually LIKE guys who get wide open. Lane Kiffen is a nut job now at a podunk school, they are a running team, and they had a young QB. Oh, and he tore up the field in their National Championship, as I recall.
LABILLBACKER Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 I like all names but Howard. Howard will be a bust. You heard it here first. But seriously, you gotta wonder why Howard produced so little at Bama besides being wide open in both championship games. I really like Adams and Reddick. Personally, I'm glad QB isn't on that list. I would take a QB in the second Agreed. Adams and Reddick would substantially boost our defense. But we do need a #2 we so Williams or Davis would work too...hoping for a trade down...
BillsFan17 Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 Bills apparently aren't taking a QB in the first according to John Wawrow
KellyToughII Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 My hope would be able to trade down a few spots then take anyone on that list, and I think we can.
VaMilBill Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 (edited) Produced so little? So....being wide open and not getting the ball is his fault? I actually LIKE guys who get wide open. Lane Kiffen is a nut job now at a podunk school, they are a running team, and they had a young QB. Oh, and he tore up the field in their National Championship, as I recall. He was left uncovered completely on two TDs in the first championship and left uncovered again this past championship for a TD. Blown coverages. Besides that he was mediocre. I don't count being left uncovered as something that will translate to the NFL. Edited April 27, 2017 by VaMilBill
KellyToughII Posted April 27, 2017 Posted April 27, 2017 Bills apparently aren't taking a QB in the first according to John Wawrow I want Peterman in the 2nd
Recommended Posts