OldTimeAFLGuy Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 St. Joe's debate team.....class of 1958. ....obviously an AARP member like me.....
Riverboat Richie Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 Nobody said they would start? They are there if Taylor doesn't improve. Yates is a career backup, don't be surprised if he doesn't make the 53 and Cardale beats him out. You will not win consistently in this league unless you have a great QB. Taylor could be that guy, you never know. We have to have other options. Worse thing is Taylor doesn't improve, we pick 10 again next year, miss out on the Big 3. That will set us back another 5 years. Taylor and Yates have NFL experience. Jones is their project. A rookie would have to beat at least two of them out. More likely Jones would hit the PS if the rookie show more. Again, I don't see it happening so their value to the team this year is nothing for a first round pick. Your going to pass up a guy that would have a better chance of playing this season for that.
John from Riverside Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 If a QB was a sure thing the Bills wouldn't get to draft them. Andrew Luck was the last sure thing. We need to draft a very good QB prospect, not a sure thing. BTW, none of these WR's, TE's or LB's are sure things either. It's a draft. Not everyone works out. Take a prospect you like with decent floor and high upside. That would be guys like OJ Howard Corey Davis Mike Williams
BuffaloBud420 Posted April 25, 2017 Author Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) Taylor and Yates have NFL experience. Jones is their project. A rookie would have to beat at least two of them out. More likely Jones would hit the PS if the rookie show more. Again, I don't see it happening so their value to the team this year is nothing for a first round pick. Your going to pass up a guy that would have a better chance of playing this season for that. You have to think of the future. We have been stuck with little options at QB for a long time. The main reason for the playoff drought. Edited April 25, 2017 by BuffaloBud420
bilzfancy Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 If a QB was a sure thing the Bills wouldn't get to draft them. Andrew Luck was the last sure thing. We need to draft a very good QB prospect, not a sure thing. BTW, none of these WR's, TE's or LB's are sure things either. It's a draft. Not everyone works out. Take a prospect you like with decent floor and high upside. if you draft a QB high and he busts, it set you team back years, not so much with a LB, DE or WR
BuffaloBud420 Posted April 25, 2017 Author Posted April 25, 2017 if you draft a QB high and he busts, it set you team back years, not so much with a LB, DE or WR Sets you back years, how many? 17
mead107 Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) bud 420 is the king of trolling--a new master! got a bunch of fish on the hook posting the same comments posted in half a dozen other threads on the same topic. I tip my hat... very light on why we have to take a QB Just another poster who wants a QB taken at 1 Edited April 25, 2017 by mead107
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 ...need some help from the collegiate gurus as I don't get to see college ball...how does the 2013 QB class compare when Bflo felt compelled to take one in the 1st versus the 2017 class when the debate rages on as to what to do in the 1st??..........
Riverboat Richie Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 You have to think of the future. We have been stuck with little options at QB for a long time. The main reason for the playoff drought. Constant coaching changes had more to do with the playoff drought than the QB situation. New systems, new coordinators and player turn over keep killing this team.
BuffaloBud420 Posted April 25, 2017 Author Posted April 25, 2017 Constant coaching changes had more to do with the playoff drought than the QB situation. New systems, new coordinators and player turn over keep killing this team. Bull
jeffismagic Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 That would be guys like OJ Howard Corey Davis Mike Williams And none of those guys are sure things. They are nice prospects. if you draft a QB high and he busts, it set you team back years, not so much with a LB, DE or WR No, it doesn't. One bad 1st round pick doesn't set you back anymore on QB than on LB. This is 2017, the contracts are no big deal for rookies.
BillsCuse Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 I don't want a QB at 10 but I think I'd take Mahomes before Watson or Trubisky. This....might be high risk, but want the possibility of a high reward. Never going to hit if you don't take a chance
bilzfancy Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 ...need some help from the collegiate gurus as I don't get to see college ball...how does the 2013 QB class compare when Bflo felt compelled to take one in the 1st versus the 2017 class when the debate rages on as to what to do in the 1st??.......... they're all projects, none are worth a top 10 pick, and even debatable if they're worth a first Rd pick
jeffismagic Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 they're all projects, none are worth a top 10 pick, and even debatable if they're worth a first Rd pick The only debate is by people who don't know the players. NFL teams will take at least 2, maybe 3 in the first.
fansince88 Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 If Sean McDermott doesn't get a QB this year I don't think it can happen at all next year. Bills likely to win 5-7 games this year. McDermott will be on the hot seat knowing Pegulas have cut last two hires after only 2 years. I think we will have to wait for a new GM and coach if it doesn't happen this draft. I think you have no clue.
BuffaloBud420 Posted April 25, 2017 Author Posted April 25, 2017 they're all projects, none are worth a top 10 pick, and even debatable if they're worth a first Rd pick And Dak Prescott was only worth a 3rd...and JarMarcus Russell worth a 1st. Means very little. You like the guy, take him top 10
bilzfancy Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 And none of those guys are sure things. They are nice prospects. No, it doesn't. One bad 1st round pick doesn't set you back anymore on QB than on LB. This is 2017, the contracts are no big deal for rookies. really?? RG3, Jake Locker, Blaine Gabbert, EJ their teams got set back, and those are just a small sample
jeffismagic Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 I think you have no clue. Well, seems like you really know how to carry on a conversation! Bravo.
Riverboat Richie Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 Bull That response tells me all I need to know about you. Have a nice day.
BuffaloBud420 Posted April 25, 2017 Author Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) really?? RG3, Jake Locker, Blaine Gabbert, EJ their teams got set back, and those are just a small sample So when we didn't draft a QB and stuck with Fitz, that's the answer Edited April 25, 2017 by BuffaloBud420
Recommended Posts