NoSaint Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 Why? It's obvious from Bills actions that they didn't value MG as the long term option, otherwise they would have made a bigger push for a long term extension. We'll soon find out why they are thinking this way. But if their thought was to keep MG as a placeholder for a year or two, then adding a bargain vet is a better option than drafting an RB. who is the bargain vet that you like at this point though? Another fans opinion. Is this what it has come to? We're using other fans opinions to validate the opinion of someone else? hes just uses friends and family as his expert shares on here. im excited for the day that he links to another post on here to back up his opinion.
thebandit27 Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 who is the bargain vet that you like at this point though? Jamaal Charles?
GG Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 Jamaal Charles? Or Blount or Jennings, if we're looking at 1-yr options
oldmanfan Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 I think you could take a shot at Blount. DeAngelo Williams. Starks. Those are veterans, and there will be God knows how many undrafted FAs and guys like MG out there that are drifting around. Or you can go to camp with the three guys on the roster right now, without even counting Tolbert, ad see what they give you. Would have liked to see MG stay but it's just not going to be that difficult to get another guy to take a little bit of the load off Shady. And maybe the guy that grabs the job will know what to do with a kickoff (sarcasm off).
NoSaint Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 Jamaal Charles? you normally have a good eye for players-- you think he makes it back to productive?
Riverboat Richie Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 who is the bargain vet that you like at this point though? hes just uses friends and family as his expert shares on here. im excited for the day that he links to another post on here to back up his opinion. Well I know his opinions line up with what ever the Rochester writers are crying about. Seen that in action quite a bit.
DrDawkinstein Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 Another fans opinion. Is this what it has come to? We're using other fans opinions to validate the opinion of someone else? It's like when I turn on any News program and they start quoting Twitter Reactions. Why do I care what some nobody has to say at all, let alone on the anonymous stage of social media?
thebandit27 Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 you normally have a good eye for players-- you think he makes it back to productive? No idea...I did see (literally just now on PFT) that his agent posted a video of him doing running/cutting drills, so clearly he's working at it. I would definitely kick the tires on him though.
Riverboat Richie Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 I think you could take a shot at Blount. DeAngelo Williams. Starks. Those are veterans, and there will be God knows how many undrafted FAs and guys like MG out there that are drifting around. Or you can go to camp with the three guys on the roster right now, without even counting Tolbert, ad see what they give you. Would have liked to see MG stay but it's just not going to be that difficult to get another guy to take a little bit of the load off Shady. And maybe the guy that grabs the job will know what to do with a kickoff (sarcasm off). They'll wait til the smoke clears from the draft and see what else is out there. I can't see the need for a one year, washed up back, looking for his last contract just to stay in the game.
NoSaint Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 It's like when I turn on any News program and they start quoting Twitter Reactions. Why do I care what some nobody has to say at all, let alone on the anonymous stage of social media? yea, and they are rarely insightful comments. i could buy sharing either high level trends that emerge across social media, or really great comments but most are @joefromgeorgia tweets "that policy sure is terrible"
Iron Maiden Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 So this means the rest of the AFC teams should not try and be as talented as they can be and make the playoffs. Why should the Bills try and retain a good player just because they have a slight chance to be a WC team. Nope...not at all....look, is it nice that TD Mike is now with NE ?...No.......does it warrant the outrage of some of the fans on here.... no....MG is not the difference maker between the Bills making the playoffs vs not making it..... Whatever record we end up with after 16 games, I believe it will be the same as it would have been with MG on the roster.... As I said a few times ( many other posters as well ), people's reaction would be completely different is the Lions or the Bucs had made that move.....but because it's NE, the Bills were " schooled again "....I don't think it's accurate....OBD put a value on MG and were not willing to pay more....it's that simple.....
NoSaint Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 No idea...I did see (literally just now on PFT) that his agent posted a video of him doing running/cutting drills, so clearly he's working at it. I would definitely kick the tires on him though. hard guy to bet against, but wrong side of 30, lots of touches and coming off injury does worry me just like a late pick as far as whether he can step up.
teef Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) Nope...not at all....look, is it nice that TD Mike is now with NE ?...No.......does it warrant the outrage of some of the fans on here.... no....MG is not the difference maker between the Bills making the playoffs vs not making it..... Whatever record we end up with after 16 games, I believe it will be the same as it would have been with MG on the roster.... As I said a few times ( many other posters as well ), people's reaction would be completely different is the Lions or the Bucs had made that move.....but because it's NE, the Bills were " schooled again "....I don't think it's accurate....OBD put a value on MG and were not willing to pay more....it's that simple..... read this JM. this sums it up perfectly. to over react on the loss of mike just isn't worth the energy. would he have been nice to keep? sure ,but at the end of the day, this team hasn't changed because of the move. Edited April 25, 2017 by teef
oldmanfan Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 It's like when I turn on any News program and they start quoting Twitter Reactions. Why do I care what some nobody has to say at all, let alone on the anonymous stage of social media? When historians write of the fall of Western civilization in this millennium, they will identify Twitter as the start of the end.
HappyDays Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) @RossTuckerNFL: So the Patriots preferred to give up a 5th Rd pick to pay Mike Gillislee more money ($4M year one) than Adrian Peterson? Pretty strange when you put it that way. So bizarre they gave a division rival a free pick. Edited April 25, 2017 by HappyDays
Success Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 It's so ridiculous reading the general boards and seeing all of the comments about the Bills being the Pats farm club, and BB outsmarting everyone. Has it occurred to anyone that this might work out for both teams? People should go back and check the scouting on Jonathan Williams. This guy tore it up in college and would have been a high round pick if not for his injury. He didn't get much of a chance last year, but he could easily do as well as MG, if not better.
NoSaint Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 @RossTuckerNFL: So the Patriots preferred to give up a 5th Rd pick to pay Mike Gillislee more money ($4M year one) than Adrian Peterson? Pretty strange when you put it that way. So bizarre they gave a division rival a free pick. if you think he hit the wall, its not that weird. backs of a certain age end their career quickly and after visiting with both they felt MG was the better 2 year deal.
HuSeYiN_NYC Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 @RossTuckerNFL: So the Patriots preferred to give up a 5th Rd pick to pay Mike Gillislee more money ($4M year one) than Adrian Peterson? Pretty strange when you put it that way. So bizarre they gave a division rival a free pick. It's kind of like playing a video game on normal mode but when it becomes too easy, you change settings to hard mode. The Patriots probably view playing us as, too easy and was probably like, ok let's give them a shot and make it a little tougher on us. They basically playing us like a video game.
hondo in seattle Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 @RossTuckerNFL: So the Patriots preferred to give up a 5th Rd pick to pay Mike Gillislee more money ($4M year one) than Adrian Peterson? Pretty strange when you put it that way. So bizarre they gave a division rival a free pick. That does sound very strange, despite the good point NoSaint makes.
DrDawkinstein Posted April 25, 2017 Posted April 25, 2017 When historians write of the fall of Western civilization in this millennium, they will identify Twitter as the start of the end. Id start with Facebook, but yes, it's all the same garbage.
Recommended Posts