JM2009 Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 Correct on both counts. But keeping MG wouldn't change that calculus for either team. We were worse and became a little more worse with MG gone.
Mark Vader Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 So what? You get a cheaper younger RB. I don't see the problem. My point is that there was no need to draft an RB. Now there is. The extra pick means using it for a player at a position that you just lost, instead of using the extra pick for a different position. Yes, they can get a younger RB, I just wonder if that player can be just as effective. He could be, but we won't know that for sure.
Zulu Cthulhu Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 NE won the SB and is a better team now then they were then. The Bills are worse right now then at the end of the season. They might still lose butler, and be replacing him with gilmore. They will be replacing blount with burkhead/gillislee. I don't think your contention is that clear cut yet.
akm0404 Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 Think a lot of people forgot this little keynote, teams like The Giants and Vikings who have needs at the running back position did not go after MG. Exactly. It might not have been the best decision, or maybe it was. It really is impossible to know now. But, to suggest that it was such a clear blunder when literally everyone who isn't the Big Bad Patriots agreed with us is a super stretch.
John from Riverside Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 You have absolutely no way of knowing this. That is right...but you could see how a fan would feel that way It is up to the young group to come in and prove the fans wrong in that area.....guys like Lawson, Ragland, Listenbee, Jon Wililams....those guys have to show they can fill the gap at the end of the day...that is the way the NFL works...you have to draft will in order to be competative.....rooks gotta step up
BADOLBILZ Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 Well good news then.. unless the Bills are planning to part ways with Sammy we won't have much cap room next year either. $40mil doesn't go very far when you factor in that only 27 players are under contract for next year (not including PS players) and the salary cap is based on top 51. That $40mil also doesn't include this year's rookie class, next year's rookie class, Sammy Watkins, Eric Wood, or Kyle WIlliams. So, if anything, be prepared for more of the same next year... You have a very rudimentary understanding of the cap, Adam. Suffice to say, you don't have a grasp on the situation. Try looking at where all that accounted-for cap money is going in 2018..........then try to imagine what is going to happen to some of those players at their age and cap figure. Going to be a lotta' money coming off the books just by sheer attrition and the cost of filling out the second half of a roster ain't what you think it is.
Boatdrinks Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 NE won the SB and is a better team now then they were then. The Bills are worse right now then at the end of the season. I don't think they're much better if at all. Different perhaps, but not better. The Bills are marginally worse on paper, but probably better in the coaching dept and possibly better with a healthy ( I hope) Ragland, Watkins and Lawson. We'll see. Every season is it's own story.
dubs Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 We were worse and became a little more worse with MG gone. False.
Turk71 Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 Those who think backup RBs win you anything in this league are fooling themselves. Why did MG get just a single offer sheet? From a team that doesn't need him nonetheless? Just a single offer sheet to become the highest paid rb on the reigning sb champs and to replace the NFL td leader. What a nobody. A random 5th rnd pick will easily replace him.
Boatdrinks Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 One thing people are missing is what the offense will look like under Dennison. Will it still be the run dominant one of the last couple years or will it be more balanced? If more balanced then that may have been involved in the decision making. One other thought occurred to me. Remember the kickoff that MG messed up and didn't cover? Our new HC is big on detail. Wonder if that entered into things; if he has a backup RB he doesn't trust on special teams? I'm sure it factored in to the decision on how much the backup RB is worth. At least somewhat.
TallskiWallski83 Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 13 pages of thread for Mike Gillislee....jesusSolid player who made himself an NFL career. A good backup and a guy any NFL team would like to have on their depth chart. We literally picked him up off the scrap heap and the $ New England gave him is a lot for an RB2. A 5th round pick will make way less money and offer way more potential to the organization than Mike. Plus, the Lombardi trophy should just be given to the Pats for the 17-18 season. Theyre winning the superbowl with or without gillislee and buffalo ain't going to be stopping it.Easy decision to make. Calm down everyone.
JM2009 Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 They might still lose butler, and be replacing him with gilmore. They will be replacing blount with burkhead/gillislee. I don't think your contention is that clear cut yet. They got Cooks from the Saints.
Zulu Cthulhu Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 False. More of an unknown at this point than demonstrably true/false.
Boatdrinks Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 Just a single offer sheet to become the highest paid rb on the reigning sb champs and to replace the NFL td leader. What a nobody. A random 5th rnd pick will easily replace him. Again, a team that didn't need him at all. He was cut before coming to BUF? Had you heard of him? Did you think that a converted RB from FLA state would rip off 7 TDs in 7 games? There are guys out there waiting for their shot. The funny thing is, if the Bills had cut McCoy, you'd likely being saying " no big deal , we have MG"... that's a much bigger pair of shoes to fill
JM2009 Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 False. Lost Gilmore, Brown, Woods, MG. We got two fullbacks, a safety, and a kicker. The CB tandom is one of the worst in the NFL right now, and the WR group outside of Watkins is a bottom tier group. The depth is worse.
Zulu Cthulhu Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 They got Cooks from the Saints. Great point - that slipped my mind. Factoring that in I'm inclined to agree. They did lose Bennett though.
Boatdrinks Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 They got Cooks from the Saints. Perhaps you should become a Pats fan until TB retires. If you aren't one already ..
Turk71 Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 13 pages of thread for Mike Gillislee....jesus Solid player who made himself an NFL career. A good backup and a guy any NFL team would like to have on their depth chart. We literally picked him up off the scrap heap and the $ New England gave him is a lot for an RB2. A 5th round pick will make way less money and offer way more potential to the organization than Mike. Plus, the Lombardi trophy should just be given to the Pats for the 17-18 season. Theyre winning the superbowl with or without gillislee and buffalo ain't going to be stopping it. Easy decision to make. Calm down everyone. Yep, way more excited to see what that 5th rnd pick will bring than keeping the most efficient back in the NFL last year. Yep
JM2009 Posted April 24, 2017 Posted April 24, 2017 Again, a team that didn't need him at all. He was cut before coming to BUF? Had you heard of him? Did you think that a converted RB from FLA state would rip off 7 TDs in 7 games? There are guys out there waiting for their shot. The funny thing is, if the Bills had cut McCoy, you'd likely being saying " no big deal , we have MG"... that's a much bigger pair of shoes to fill He proved his worth on the Buffalo Bills and what he meant to the Bills running attack.
Recommended Posts