H2o Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/855459059226595334 You have a generational talent in Garrett (jmo) whom the coaches are all in on and the meddling owner is going to step in to make them take Trubisky. Crazy imo.
Kirby Jackson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 (edited) Jimmy Haslam isn't James Dolan bad but he's in the bottom 5 owners in sports IMO. Edited April 21, 2017 by Kirby Jackson
Rodrigo Borgia Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 You have no idea how many fans wish that the Bills were in the same positions as the Browns are in right now.
Kirby Jackson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 S-M-O-K-E-S-C-R-E-E-NWhy brother with the smokescreen when you have the 1st pick? They should draft Garrett (and I think that they will). I'm thinking that they may trade back up to 5 (using picks 12 and 52) to get him.
H2o Posted April 21, 2017 Author Posted April 21, 2017 S-M-O-K-E-S-C-R-E-E-N This is the #1 pick. From everything I have read they have not even considered trading out. Who wants to move up that bad for Trubisky anyway that they could possibly be putting pressure on?
PolishDave Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Why brother with the smokescreen when you have the 1st pick? They should draft Garrett (and I think that they will). I'm thinking that they may trade back up to 5 (using picks 12 and 52) to get him. Exactly what I was thinking. Who are you trying to fool? You can pick anybody and announce it. Doesn't change anything.
KollegeStudnet Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Browns are gonna Browns. Garrett will go number one. Wouldn't be surprised if they get Garrett and trade up to snag Trubisky.
CEN-CAL17 Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 I'll go on record stating I don't think Myles Garrett will live up to his #1 overall status. It's just something about his fluidity I don't like....
TheElectricCompany Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 (edited) This is the #1 pick. From everything I have read they have not even considered trading out. Who wants to move up that bad for Trubisky anyway that they could possibly be putting pressure on? Perhaps its somehow tied to what they do with their 12th pick. Sashi and company want to stay at 12 and hope Mitch is there, owner wants them to move up so Jesters and Bills don't grab him. They could be hedging their bets for someone to call them requesting a trade at 12 in the event Mitch goes early. They should be tarred and feathered if they pass on Garrett. Edited April 21, 2017 by TheElectricCompany
mannc Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 How about this: Trade the no 1 pick to NE for Garappolo and Malcolm Butler?
YoloinOhio Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 (edited) How about this: Trade the no 1 pick to NE for Garappolo and Malcolm Butler?according to Schefter the pats are not trading Jimmy under any circumstances. They ask him every week on his radio spot here because Browns really wanted him and he said on a stack of bibles that his pats source is accurate and they will not be trading him. Makes me think Brady is close to hanging it up no matter how many avocados and kale salads he eats every day. Edited April 21, 2017 by YoloinOhio
Kirby Jackson Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 How about this: Trade the no 1 pick to NE for Garappolo and Malcolm Butler?That's an interesting thought!! They can turn around and take someone like Derek Barnett at 12, Dalvin Cook at 33 and Obi Melifonwu at 52. That would be a nice start to the draft.
mannc Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 That's an interesting thought!! They can turn around and take someone like Derek Barnett at 12, Dalvin Cook at 33 and Obi Melifonwu at 52. That would be a nice start to the draft.And I think the Pats would it, too.
JimKellyTryouts Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 (edited) I surprised no one has said it yet so allow me: LaCanfora If this were a bills targeted headline we'd be all over that by now. "hearing" "rumblings" conjecture etc... Edited April 21, 2017 by JimKellyTryouts
TheElectricCompany Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 It's not the first time the Browns got tricky
Domdab99 Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 S-M-O-K-E-S-C-R-E-E-N they have the first pick. Who are they trying to fool? They should pick Garrett, then make a trade with SF for the 2nd pick and pick Trubisky.
WhoTom Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Why brother with the smokescreen when you have the 1st pick? They should draft Garrett (and I think that they will). I'm thinking that they may trade back up to 5 (using picks 12 and 52) to get him. Exactly what I was thinking. Who are you trying to fool? You can pick anybody and announce it. Doesn't change anything. Why announce the pick before you have to? That would give the other 31 teams more time to think about who they'll pick, knowing in advance one guy who's off the board.
fridge Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 Isn't this a La Confora post? Does he have any credibility left?
Recommended Posts