C.Biscuit97 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 then there is this . he had 3 games with three of more sacks Tex san Antonio . lamar and lou Monroe. That's a helluva of a stat. I just saw he had 4.5 of his 8.5 sacks against San Antonio. Obviously, he was doubled and tripled all year but those stats are Aaron Maybin like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Call me crazy but I think he'll be somewhat of a bust.... a poor mans Mario Williams. I get it... his combine #s are great, but I just don't think he has the drive or what it takes mentally. I guess we'll have to wait and see. I think Fornette is who I'd take with #1 if I'm Cleveland. Cause he won't last past 6... I'd bet Solomon has a better career. They would get roasted unmercifully, but I do think there's some concerns on Garrett (specifically effort) and I can buy that Fournette has the best chance of being a generational talent in this draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 They would get roasted unmercifully, but I do think there's some concerns on Garrett (specifically effort) and I can buy that Fournette has the best chance of being a generational talent in this draft. I might be wrong but I'm not sure LF will even be the best RB in his draft class. If they don't Garrett, trade down for more picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baskingridgebillsfan Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Pete Franklin was the best! and WWWE came across loud and clear when I wanted at night. My favorite Pete franklin moment was when he was on the fan in nyc. The day the Yankees traded Ricky herderson for a package lead by Eric plunk. He was on fire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 Bit of a stretch for a red flag. Pretty sure he goes #1. ESPN sucks,i didn't mean red flag that way (impacting draft position). Simply is it a red flag for the Browns or whoever takes him #1 that he can't deal with constructive criticism of his play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 no red flag for me i think he is being smart deal with the haters in media AFTER you go #1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 If it helps him fall to 10 then yes it's a major red flag. LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommonCents Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 They would get roasted unmercifully, but I do think there's some concerns on Garrett (specifically effort) and I can buy that Fournette has the best chance of being a generational talent in this draft. I don't see what people are getting so excited about Fournette for, he is solid but a generational talent? Heck this kid was HORRIBLE in some big games. Generational like Trich slow to the hole and only runs over lesser competition. Blah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheElectricCompany Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Fake news! No red flags. The tape don't lie, he's a monster out there. Be bizarre if he didn't go #1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Browns playing moneyball might trade down to a team that wants Garrett more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 The NFL knows that the 49ers are on the clock. MG to Cleveland is a done deal barring him being run over by a bus or getting caught up in a kiddie porn sting in the next couple weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUBSTER Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 If it helps him fall to 10 then yes it's a major red flag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheElectricCompany Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I don't see what people are getting so excited about Fournette for, he is solid but a generational talent? Heck this kid was HORRIBLE in some big games. Generational like Trich slow to the hole and only runs over lesser competition. Blah. His style is becoming less and less common, the league would prefer more McCaffery types, but he is certainly an elite workhorse type back. Marshawn Lynch esque in his ability to just destroy linebackers and safeties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 No way anyone should touch this kid with pick 1-9. Too many red flags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ennjay Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Although according to Cleveland.com and Mary Kay there's starting to be buzz for Fournette at #1, which would be just amazing. That would be so Browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KollegeStudnet Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Pointing out when the "trade Romo and pick me Jerry" video came out, I was criticized for saying that raised a red flag. The red flag is mostly age. But, there have been times where he Mario Williamsed it on plays. Gil Brandt pointed it out as his only flaw, Myles would give up at times--must finish play. Overall, he still goes numero uno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 i think Browns either take him or trade back They have all the power to do so. Yet they have so many picks as it is, eventually they will have to use them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 They have all the power to do so. Yet they have so many picks as it is, eventually they will have to use them. yes I would be very surprised if they trade back (again) but, Browns. Their 53 man roster last year was 50% rookies and the last thing they need is more rookies but, Browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxy312 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 The article hit massive levels of failure when it said "Unless he's averaging multiple sacks per game". Just plain stupid. Bruce Smith played 279 games in his career and had 200 sacks. If Garrett gets 75% of that, he'll be in the HOF. Just another case of a bad reporter writing an article, instead of a journalist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuvian Posted April 12, 2017 Share Posted April 12, 2017 these media people are just hyping themselves by whatever means possible. Controversy sells Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts