Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 Reports say the missiles flew in circles around the target exceeding 30 minutes to coordinate the blasts within a 2 minute window. Link? If true, more evidence the Russian AD in the area was offline.
ALF Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 No real proof yet the chemical weapon was not the rebels like Syria and Russia claim. Saudi extremists did 9/11 Saudi main funding of war against Assad ? Saudi war against Yemen rebels Yet Saudi is a U.S. ally for oil hmm jmo looking for the truth
DC Tom Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 Link? If true, more evidence the Russian AD in the area was offline. Or there was no Russian AD in the area. More likely all the missiles flew different routes to hit the target at the same time. You generally wouldn't have missiles circling the target and giving people time to wake up, and having each missile fly a different route is more sound for a number of reasons. The US military basically invented this sort of "time on target" bombardment, and they are very, very good at it. "30 minutes" seems awfully high, too, since a VLS can salvo 5 missiles a minute.
Doc Brown Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 Or there was no Russian AD in the area. More likely all the missiles flew different routes to hit the target at the same time. You generally wouldn't have missiles circling the target and giving people time to wake up, and having each missile fly a different route is more sound for a number of reasons. The US military basically invented this sort of "time on target" bombardment, and they are very, very good at it. "30 minutes" seems awfully high, too, since a VLS can salvo 5 missiles a minute. "A US defense official told CNN Friday morning that an initial battle damage assessment from the strike was that 58 of the 59 missiles "severely degraded or destroyed" their intended target. The official cautioned that this is just the earliest assessment using radar and that more robust assessments using satellites and other surveillance is still pending."
ALF Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) If Assad leaves Syria will the large Christian population there be safe ? I pray for the good Muslims safety also , just not ISIS Edited April 7, 2017 by ALF
DC Tom Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 If Assad leaves Syria will the large Christian population there be safe ? No. Not that they are now.
meazza Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 No. Not that they are now. Most of the Syrians I know are Christian and got the !@#$ out of there a long time ago.
ALF Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 Most of the Syrians I know are Christian and got the !@#$ out of there a long time ago. Thank you , still sad
boyst Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 Link? If true, more evidence the Russian AD in the area was offline. fox news radio and Potus radio on Sirius
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 Or there was no Russian AD in the area. More likely all the missiles flew different routes to hit the target at the same time. You generally wouldn't have missiles circling the target and giving people time to wake up, and having each missile fly a different route is more sound for a number of reasons. The US military basically invented this sort of "time on target" bombardment, and they are very, very good at it. "30 minutes" seems awfully high, too, since a VLS can salvo 5 missiles a minute. Also possible. Per the bolded, they are very good at it and that makes far more sense than what was suggested.
grinreaper Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 The first missiles launched circled the launching area so that they could synch up with the later missiles. They all hit their targets within a 2-3 minute period.
B-Man Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 "The United States will no longer wait for Assad to use chemical weapons without any consequences. Those days are over." - @NikkiHaley And for those who missed it two pages back:
B-Large Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 So Assad is winning the civil war in his country, why gas a bunch of civilians and provoke and outside power?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 So Assad is winning the civil war in his country, why gas a bunch of civilians and provoke and outside power? Because it's what Arab despots do? See: hussein, saddam.
DC Tom Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 So Assad is winning the civil war in his country, why gas a bunch of civilians and provoke and outside power? http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/193131-tomahawks-fired-at-syria/?p=4319529
Foxx Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 So Assad is winning the civil war in his country, why gas a bunch of civilians and provoke and outside power? well, for one thing... they are one of the few remaining countries with no central banksters operating within it.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 well, for one thing... they are one of the few remaining countries with no central banksters operating within it. Shh.
frostbitmic Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 Too wimpy of a response ... Turn Syria and pretty much all of the middle east into a great big glass parking lot .... Nuke em all Donny, nuke em all.
meazza Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 http://www.timesofisrael.com/some-trump-supporters-turn-on-president-over-us-strike-on-syria/ The alt-right is unhappy. Awesome.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 http://www.timesofisrael.com/some-trump-supporters-turn-on-president-over-us-strike-on-syria/ The alt-right is unhappy. Awesome. You're a man of many contradictions. On one hand, you're quick to defend arab/muslim culture. On the other, you're happy when people who don't want to bomb arabs/muslims are unhappy.
Recommended Posts