jr1 Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 he should be a full time WR. His bench press at the combine wasn't RB material
Chuck Wagon Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 Absent getting Adams or Hooker at 10, trading down to the late teens / early 20s, getting a 2nd and more and being able to still get one of Williams / Davis / Ross is my preferred draft.
Blokestradamus Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 he should be a full time WR. His bench press at the combine wasn't RB material  Does he even lift, bro?!  https://twitter.com/MoveTheSticks/status/846611957339713536
Chuck Wagon Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 he should be a full time WR. His bench press at the combine wasn't RB material   There's a lot of talk about him being a RB / slot WR / KR hybrid. It increases his value greatly as he's very strong in the passing game. No one believe he's the type of player to get 20+ touches lined up at RB.
Pbomb Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 I would definatly trade down if possible. Being able to trade down multiple times would be incredible but probably not very likely
TC in St. Louis Posted March 31, 2017 Author Posted March 31, 2017 [This is an automated response] Â The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post. Â The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Â Thank you. Sorry about that. I fixed it.
Mark Vader Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 I am all for trading down, be it with Denver or any other team. Â We need more draft picks. Â I don't care who we have to take a pass on at 10. Â There is good depth in this year's draft at positions we need.
Jamie Muellers Ghost Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 (edited) You can't discuss John Murphy or Donald Jones here but you can post fake news LOL Â Saying that if they threw Siemian in with a second and a fourth it would work for me :-) Edited March 31, 2017 by Jamie Muellers Ghost
Baba Booey Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 I was hearing that Philly is very interested in McCaffery. And in a heartbeat I'd do that trade. We need more picks!
dpberr Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 I vote against trading down. Â I want Whaley to focus on getting the team one quarter versus trying to get it right with two dimes and the nickel. Â Plus, I'd never give an AFC competitor a Top 10 pick.
Bronxbomber21 Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 To me it would depends on who's available at 10 if one of the following was there then I would have to really think about it. Hooker, Adams, Allan or Lattimore
John from Riverside Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 its a long way to trade down but for those picks I would do it
SoCal Deek Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 It doesn't seem like the Broncos would need to move all the way up to the #10 spot to get him. I'm thinking he'll still be there for quite a few picks before Denver's number comes up. No?
Seasons1992 Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 That is a lot of pics for moving up. I would do it instantly.
H2o Posted March 31, 2017 Posted March 31, 2017 To quote Sarah Palin "ya'betcha." Glenn Rice approves this quote
Recommended Posts