Tiberius Posted March 30, 2017 Posted March 30, 2017 The Freedom Caucus will hurt the entire Republican agenda if they don't get on the team, & fast. We must fight them, & Dems, in 2018! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 30, 2017
Nanker Posted March 30, 2017 Posted March 30, 2017 This is an automated response. Nobody gives a ****. 1
Tiberius Posted March 30, 2017 Author Posted March 30, 2017 This is an automated response. Nobody gives a ****. Sure ya don't!
grinreaper Posted March 30, 2017 Posted March 30, 2017 So, what's your main point? pa·ren·the·sis [pəˈrenTHəsəs] NOUN parentheses (plural noun) a word, clause, or sentence inserted as an explanation or afterthought into a passage that is grammatically complete without it, in writing usually marked off by curved brackets, dashes, or commas. (parentheses) a pair of round brackets ( ) used to mark off a parenthetical word or phrase.
DC Tom Posted March 30, 2017 Posted March 30, 2017 [For those of you with gatorman on ignore, ridiculous verbiage removed courtesy of DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.8. You're welcome.] [This is an automated response.] Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.8.
DC Tom Posted March 30, 2017 Posted March 30, 2017 Fight! [This is an automated response.] Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.8. 1 1
Tiberius Posted March 30, 2017 Author Posted March 30, 2017 OMG, this is way better than I thought! On Wednesday — about 18 hours before Mr. Trump’s Twitter attack — senior officials from the White House invited two dozen leaders from conservative groups for a closed-door session to plot a path ahead. Participants, who were instructed by the organizers of the event not to divulge details of the meeting, or even the groups attending, described the hourlong sit-down as a welcome, but long overdue, policy discussion. It included a candid, polite airing of complaints that they have been largely left out of the loop on major administration decision-making, according to people who attended. The meeting, put together by Mr. Trump’s conservative outreach director, Paul Teller, at the request of conservatives, included representatives of the Heritage Foundation, Americans for Limited Government and Judicial Watch, all of whom were critical of some administration policies, including the health bill. Thomas Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch — a conservative legal advocacy group that successfully sued the Obama administration for the release of Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails — made a pointed pitch for the release of all documents pertaining to the Russia controversy, according to people who attended the session in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building adjacent to the White House. Mr. Fitton, the participants said, told Mr. Teller that Mr. Trump needed to be committed to a policy of extreme transparency about contacts between Russian government officials and Trump associates during the 2016 campaign, including Michael T. Flynn, the former national security adviser, and Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law. Oh my!!! https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/30/us/politics/freedom-caucus-donald-trump.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
DC Tom Posted March 30, 2017 Posted March 30, 2017 [For those of you with gatorman on ignore, ridiculous verbiage removed courtesy of DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.8. You're welcome.] [This is an automated response.] This ridiculous verbiage is brought to you by... Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.8.
Azalin Posted March 30, 2017 Posted March 30, 2017 That quote combined with your bot's reply are things of beauty.
KD in CA Posted April 1, 2017 Posted April 1, 2017 [This is an automated response.] This ridiculous verbiage is brought to you by... Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.8. As someone who does have connor on ignore but occasionally feels compelled to click on the 'view it anyway' button, this new beta version is just what I've been waiting for; it's a paradigm shift!
John from Riverside Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 On 3/30/2017 at 7:57 AM, Nanker said: This is an automated response. Nobody gives a ****. I do 25 minutes ago, BillStime said: Have you heard Matt Gaetz talk? The smart part is highly debatable. He looks the part, but he opens his mouth and ***** comes out.
Tommy Callahan Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 Just now, John from Riverside said: I do This post being brought back from 6 years a good example of severe partisan trolling 1
John from Riverside Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 Just now, Tommy Callahan said: This post being brought back from 6 years a good example of severe partisan trolling I think it’s good to keep track of what people say it shows how many times they flip 1
Doc Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 The Dems still have Joke and Kammy. It doesn't matter what the Repubs do. 1
JaCrispy Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 On 3/30/2017 at 2:00 PM, Tiberius said: Fight! I like the infighting in the Republican Party, regardless of the sides- keeps them honest… I wish there was more push back within the Democrat Party…👍 1
BillStime Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said: This post being brought back from 6 years a good example of severe partisan trolling 👆🤣 - someone is embarsassed. Six years old - and the GQP is still a mess. ETTD Don't blame us for your poor choices... clearly, you haven't learned.
Recommended Posts