boyst Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Q1 -- rebuttal Nice definition. I didn't really read it too much because your avatar reminded me of the other side of "Enlightenment" he's trying the Boyst tactic. He couldn't even link the video right. Vote not him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 he's trying the Boyst tactic. He couldn't even link the video right. Vote not him Don't be so self-important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Don't be so self-important. you realize you're talking to me right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 you realize you're talking to me right? Yes, I do. It's like approaching a beehive with a stick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) Yes, I do. It's like approaching a beehive with a stick. well, i'm important. i promise. wait, can i be the stick? Edited March 23, 2017 by Boyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 wait, can i be the stick? I thought you were.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 well, i'm important. i promise. wait, can i be the stick? Bro, as long as someone else is the hive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 23, 2017 Author Share Posted March 23, 2017 Is there a honey pot involved somewhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 worst match ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Q2 - I consider it to be patriotically blasphemous to suggest anything be stricken from the constitution. You'll never get my vote by suggesting anything of the kind. Q2 goes to Nanker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Q2 - I consider it to be patriotically blasphemous to suggest anything be stricken from the constitution. You'll never get my vote by suggesting anything of the kind. Q2 goes to Nanker. Wut? Where? Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Nanker gets my vote because he deposited 20k into my bank account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 i am leaning toward snafu because nanker hasn't told me i'm pretty today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Nanker gets my vote because he deposited 20k into my bank account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Walt effing Coleman should be scoring this match... Even he would make it seem fairer. Face it snafu this one is rigged and matches the meaning of your screenname. Bills have a better chance of winning the next 3 SuperBowls! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Snafu gets my vote, because in the spirit of the electoral college I'm voting with the intent to balance out the tyranny of the majority, thereby demonstrating the incorrectness of his argument that the electoral college is obsolete. Which, in explaining why he shouldn't get my vote, even though he is, justifies his position and earns him my vote. Which is some horribly contrived, convoluted-enough bass-ackwards bull **** logic on my part that it's most accurately described as a "SNAFU" anyway. So...!@#$ it. I need a beer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Snafu gets my vote, because in the spirit of the electoral college I'm voting with the intent to balance out the tyranny of the majority, thereby demonstrating the incorrectness of his argument that the electoral college is obsolete. Which, in explaining why he shouldn't get my vote, even though he is, justifies his position and earns him my vote. Which is some horribly contrived, convoluted-enough bass-ackwards bull **** logic on my part that it's most accurately described as a "SNAFU" anyway. So...!@#$ it. I need a beer. Good lord - do I need to come up with a cognitive dissonance bot of my own? Just trying to fathom all that has left me in dire need of a cool washcloth and a lie down.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 24, 2017 Author Share Posted March 24, 2017 I'm considering voting for DC Tom. Sorry. I'm going away from the Intarwebs for much of today. Halftime will be a bit longer than expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostbitmic Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 My vote, unless the electoral college strips it away goes to Snafu. Waking up to a clip from Monty Python made this decision easy. Of course if it wasn't for the electoral college we wouldn't have George Bush or Cheez-it Trump as President, on the other hand we would've had Al Gore and Hillary. It's depressing that in this great country we get total morons running for the highest office in the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 My vote, unless the electoral college strips it away goes to Snafu. Waking up to a clip from Monty Python made this decision easy. Of course if it wasn't for the electoral college we wouldn't have George Bush or Cheez-it Trump as President, on the other hand we would've had Al Gore and Hillary. It's depressing that in this great country we get total morons running for the highest office in the land. What you expect smart people to work for $400,000 a year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts