Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Q1 -- rebuttal

 

Nice definition. I didn't really read it too much because your avatar reminded me of the other side of "Enlightenment"

 

he's trying the Boyst tactic. He couldn't even link the video right. Vote not him
  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted (edited)

 

Yes, I do.

It's like approaching a beehive with a stick.

well, i'm important. i promise.

 

wait, can i be the stick?

Edited by Boyst62
Posted

Q2 - I consider it to be patriotically blasphemous to suggest anything be stricken from the constitution. You'll never get my vote by suggesting anything of the kind. Q2 goes to Nanker.

Posted

Q2 - I consider it to be patriotically blasphemous to suggest anything be stricken from the constitution. You'll never get my vote by suggesting anything of the kind. Q2 goes to Nanker.

Wut? Where? Huh?

Posted

Walt effing Coleman should be scoring this match... Even he would make it seem fairer.

 

Face it snafu this one is rigged and matches the meaning of your screenname.

 

Bills have a better chance of winning the next 3 SuperBowls!

Posted

Snafu gets my vote, because in the spirit of the electoral college I'm voting with the intent to balance out the tyranny of the majority, thereby demonstrating the incorrectness of his argument that the electoral college is obsolete.

 

Which, in explaining why he shouldn't get my vote, even though he is, justifies his position and earns him my vote.

 

Which is some horribly contrived, convoluted-enough bass-ackwards bull **** logic on my part that it's most accurately described as a "SNAFU" anyway. So...!@#$ it. I need a beer.

Posted

Snafu gets my vote, because in the spirit of the electoral college I'm voting with the intent to balance out the tyranny of the majority, thereby demonstrating the incorrectness of his argument that the electoral college is obsolete.

 

Which, in explaining why he shouldn't get my vote, even though he is, justifies his position and earns him my vote.

 

Which is some horribly contrived, convoluted-enough bass-ackwards bull **** logic on my part that it's most accurately described as a "SNAFU" anyway. So...!@#$ it. I need a beer.

 

Good lord - do I need to come up with a cognitive dissonance bot of my own?

 

Just trying to fathom all that has left me in dire need of a cool washcloth and a lie down....

Posted

I'm considering voting for DC Tom. :unsure:

 

Sorry. I'm going away from the Intarwebs for much of today. Halftime will be a bit longer than expected.

Posted

My vote, unless the electoral college strips it away goes to Snafu.

 

Waking up to a clip from Monty Python made this decision easy.

 

Of course if it wasn't for the electoral college we wouldn't have George Bush or Cheez-it Trump as President, on the other hand we would've had Al Gore and Hillary. It's depressing that in this great country we get total morons running for the highest office in the land.

Posted

My vote, unless the electoral college strips it away goes to Snafu.

 

Waking up to a clip from Monty Python made this decision easy.

 

Of course if it wasn't for the electoral college we wouldn't have George Bush or Cheez-it Trump as President, on the other hand we would've had Al Gore and Hillary. It's depressing that in this great country we get total morons running for the highest office in the land.

 

What you expect smart people to work for $400,000 a year?

×
×
  • Create New...