JM2009 Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 who was the GM in 2013? Whaley was after the draft. An incoming GM would have a huge say in that draft. He had huge input in the EJ pick. I don't know what would change, but here is what I hope would change... Hopefully the new GM would handle the draft differently. More standing pat and trading down to stockpile picks instead of targeting players for trading up and losing picks. I would hope the new GM would put more resources into finding that elusive franchise QB. Taylor is a nice placeholder, but this team needs a franchise guy. The new GM should be able to do a better job of cap management and putting together a complete roster that isn't as top heavy and has less holes with more character guys that put football and team first. The new GM should also be better at massaging the free agency process better to get valuable compensatory picks, this goes hand in hand with drafting better and having more picks. Also the new guy should be a better leader than Whaley, get along better with the coaching staff, and have much better communication skills and presence. Also with a new GM the power structure should change with the coach reporting to the GM who reports to ownership. No more of this crap where they both report to ownership independently. Anyway thats my 2 cents. This is a very good post. Spot on. ^^^^^ This is the GODs honest TRUTH! ^^^^^ The team is just starting to recover from being on "life support" for the better part of a decade. Ahem... you forgot Roswell, NM. I heard that Whaley was the one who ordered the debris to be taken to Area 51. Whaley would not be hired as a GM for 31 other organizations.
Hurricane Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Whaley was after the draft. An incoming GM would have a huge say in that draft. He had huge input in the EJ pick. This is a very good post. Spot on. Whaley would not be hired as a GM for 31 other organizations. Past is the past... Look towards the future..
Bill_with_it Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Link to photo please.It happened it was reported by all of the buffalo news. You google it.
bilzfancy Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Past is the past... Look towards the future.. exactly
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Link to photo please. Report: Tension mounts between Doug Marrone, Bills front office http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/news/tension-reportedly-mounting-between-doug-marrone-buffalo-bills-front-office/15mgd4mr0zypl19p6xk3c37ont
wilcoam Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Hurricane is right, there's no point drudging up the past, or being fixated on one trade, one draft, or one selection in the draft Its about winning games, making the playoffs, and a whole body of work in building the best 53 person team year in and year out So if DW can build a perennial playoff team here, from this point forward, great he's the guy And if he can't they outta bring in someone else who can The big question is, how many years, will they give him to succeed? I like DW, I think he's done a decent job upgrading the talent, from where we were in 2011, 2013, etc But its still not good enough, unfort he hasn't succeeded, on the field, where it counts And 2017 so far isn't looking a potential 10-11 win season If I'm the Pegs, I'm giving him this year, and then moving on if there is not progress... jc
Hardcore Bills Fan Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 (edited) God I hate being right. Just the fact that this is speculation shows how bad our FO is right now. Edited March 25, 2017 by Hardcore Bills Fan
iinii Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 (edited) I think there is more to being a GM than you realize. You can think whatever you like, after all you're just a robot and Pegs isn't paying you to think. Try facts and not alternate ones. Belichick is the de facto GM of the New England Patriots. Hire the right coach. Edited March 25, 2017 by iinii
jr1 Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Sean read Doug's wiki page and shouted "get this pervert out of my sight"
GunnerBill Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 It's also quite clear that Lynn was unhappy to be placed into that position and left to dangle because the GM -- whom numerous asked to speak to -- declined all interview requests. Had Whaley deemed to make himself available and not spend the practice period open to the media hiding in the off-limits weight-room area, then Lynn and the Bills would not be placed in a decision to be exposed to what occurred. Otherwise, Lynn was not pestered about who fired Rex. jw Wasn't Whaley's place to John. It was Terry's. He fired Rex. He should have been there front and centre. I know he doesn't like doing it, it doesn't matter. It is called leadership. In the absence of Terry would it have been better Doug than just ALynn? Sure. But it was Terry who should have been on the stand... he just fired his hand picked Head Coach. Jeff Laurie did it best the year before when firing Chip at a similar stage. A total coincidence that we have replaced Scott with a guy from that Eagles organisation? Or a recognition that they got it right while we failed?
fansince88 Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Do you actually hold anyone responsible for this drought? Before Whaley and now with him?Whaley is going on his fifth year as GM. Not enough time I suppose. Just a lot of bad luck. But if it true that he has never picked HIS coach then the drought cant be placed on him. He is doing well with the roster and now has a quality coaching staff. The clock starts now imho.
GaryPinC Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Wasn't Whaley's place to John. It was Terry's. He fired Rex. He should have been there front and centre. I know he doesn't like doing it, it doesn't matter. It is called leadership. In the absence of Terry would it have been better Doug than just ALynn? Sure. But it was Terry who should have been on the stand... he just fired his hand picked Head Coach. Jeff Laurie did it best the year before when firing Chip at a similar stage. A total coincidence that we have replaced Scott with a guy from that Eagles organisation? Or a recognition that they got it right while we failed? Sure, Pegula was ultimately responsible, and Whaley had justification to avoid the situation because of that. But to those saying Whaley should be given more power, here was a vacuum for him to step up and show some leadership skills. Fail. Many companies don't promote and then see how you handle the new responsibility of the position. They give you some of those "new" responsibilities or judge how you step up to situations beyond your current responsibilities before deciding on the promotion.
cd1 Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 It happened it was reported by all of the buffalo news. You google it. NO, If you make an assertion then back it up with a link. ELSE it is just BS.
Cripple Creek Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Could you try that again in English? How does a 12 year old get to nearly 1,900 posts? Go outside Jeffy, please, go outside and play for a while.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Can't we just all get along? Meaasge boards are all filled with opinions. It's how people respond that makes the content worthwhile JMO
PromoTheRobot Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Then please tell us all why you approve of Whaley and the FO. Why in heck everything black or white? This isn't about approval. It's about reality. There is no evidence that there is friction. There is one story (repeated by other media) that something is up. This from a guy who hasn't been right often with his Bills coverage. I know it's hard to maintain perspective when you are mid-orgasm over another anti-Whaley rumor, but try to separate the speculation from the facts.
nucci Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Why in heck everything black or white? This isn't about approval. It's about reality. There is no evidence that there is friction. There is one story (repeated by other media) that something is up. This from a guy who hasn't been right often with his Bills coverage. I know it's hard to maintain perspective when you are mid-orgasm over another anti-Whaley rumor, but try to separate the speculation from the facts. You're in the wrong place
cd1 Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 Why in heck everything black or white? This isn't about approval. It's about reality. There is no evidence that there is friction. There is one story (repeated by other media) that something is up. This from a guy who hasn't been right often with his Bills coverage. I know it's hard to maintain perspective when you are mid-orgasm over another anti-Whaley rumor, but try to separate the speculation from the facts. Hilarious!!!! Thanks for the laugh.
K-9 Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 who was the GM in 2013? In name or in practical terms?
jeffismagic Posted March 25, 2017 Posted March 25, 2017 In name or in practical terms? Obviously Whaley was making the picks. Buddy Nix would never draft an undersized linebacker from Oregon.
Recommended Posts