2020 Our Year For Sure Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 Pretty much where I am at as well/thread? lol
papazoid Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 Maybe if Tyrod showed up when the game mattered with those stats he would have more fans behind him and would have been paid a bigger contract. Padding stats when the prevent D is out is how Trent Edwards had good stats, in fact even Fitz could pad with the best of them. Look how good he is, just remember crunchtime is when the good ones show to ball. TT or Defense ?? vs the raiders when we had a 24-9 lead in 3rd qtr, then lost 38-24 or vs the jets when we had a 24-20 lead in 3rd qrt, then lost 37-31 or vs Miami when we led 31-28 with a minute left and lost
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 TT or Defense ?? vs the raiders when we had a 24-9 lead in 3rd qtr, then lost 38-24 or vs the jets when we had a 24-20 lead in 3rd qrt, then lost 37-31 or vs Miami when we led 31-28 with a minute left and lost Who stopped passing to a healthy Sammy in the 2nd half of the Raiders game allowing then to catch up? The Miami game when the Bills won the coin toss in OT and failed to clinch the game with a TD It's way easy to blame the defense and shield TT.
John from Riverside Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 (edited) Who stopped passing to a healthy Sammy in the 2nd half of the Raiders game allowing then to catch up? The Miami game when the Bills won the coin toss in OT and failed to clinch the game with a TD It's way easy to blame the defense and shield TT. A healthy Sammy? Was Sammy actually EVER healthy this last year? I will say it took a team effort to blow that game Edited April 6, 2017 by John from Hemet
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 A healthy Sammy? Was Sammy actually EVER healthy this last year? I will say it took a team effort to blow that game He was healthy enough in the 1st half and killing the Raiders, Let me restate this ..... Who stopped passing to Sammy in the 2nd half of the Raiders game allowing then to catch up and why? (just like Sammy was healthy enough in the 1st half and killing the Chiefs the year before.) As I recall Sammy wasn't injured or re-aggravate an injury during that game. My post - What stopped Sammy...... There are 3 possible answers 1 - Sammy was injured and couldn't play in the 2nd half 2 - blame the Coaching staff and play calling 3 - blame on the QB, maybe due to his inability to pass for more than 30 times in a game and walk away with a win. I believe TT's record in such occurrences is 1 victory out of 10 times.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 Who stopped passing to a healthy Sammy in the 2nd half of the Raiders game allowing then to catch up? The Miami game when the Bills won the coin toss in OT and failed to clinch the game with a TD It's way easy to blame the defense and shield TT. The Miami game where the FG Carp missed would have sealed it because the Phins punted on the next possession?
jeffismagic Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 The Miami game where the FG Carp missed would have sealed it because the Phins punted on the next possession? The problem is that if Buffalo scores that changes what Miami has to do. They would not punt on 4th down.
r00tabaga Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 Is this thread just a joke now? There hasnt been anything about COVER1's OP for like 12 pages. This is simply a "beat Mario thread" now. Every couple days I repost in it and then wish I didn't....like right now
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 The problem is that if Buffalo scores that changes what Miami has to do. They would not punt on 4th down. They also wouldn't have likely started with the ball on the 45 due to a FG miss.
jeffismagic Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 They also wouldn't have likely started with the ball on the 45 due to a FG miss. Sure. It all changes.
John from Riverside Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 He was healthy enough in the 1st half and killing the Raiders, Let me restate this ..... Who stopped passing to Sammy in the 2nd half of the Raiders game allowing then to catch up and why? (just like Sammy was healthy enough in the 1st half and killing the Chiefs the year before.) As I recall Sammy wasn't injured or re-aggravate an injury during that game. My post - What stopped Sammy...... There are 3 possible answers 1 - Sammy was injured and couldn't play in the 2nd half 2 - blame the Coaching staff and play calling 3 - blame on the QB, maybe due to his inability to pass for more than 30 times in a game and walk away with a win. I believe TT's record in such occurrences is 1 victory out of 10 times. So in other words.....we actually dont know
ogham26 Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 this video got me pumped up. also kind of wish we would have kept justin hunter as a 5th wr
transplantbillsfan Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 What are we even arguing about at this point? Tyrod is not a long term or franchise QB. You'd be foolish to even argue that. He's a decent stop gap whose contract is structured as such and will likely be replaced immediately once another option comes along (likely through the draft). With a strong running game and defense we can win games and make the playoffs with Tyrod as our QB. No one is arguing that Taylor is the long term answer at QB. I'm not, though I bet there are several (including you, Bangarang) who thinks that is what I'm arguing. However, unlike the unwavering belief that many posters have that they have to "stick to their guns" and dig into their foxholes, I think Taylor still could be the long term answer.
jeffismagic Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 No one is arguing that Taylor is the long term answer at QB. I'm not, though I bet there are several (including you, Bangarang) who thinks that is what I'm arguing. However, unlike the unwavering belief that many posters have that they have to "stick to their guns" and dig into their foxholes, I think Taylor still could be the long term answer. I don't care if fans want to Billieve. My issue is if the Bills front office understands how to evaluate QBs. If McDermott ties himself to Tyrod he will fail. And fans will have 3 more wasted years.
Bangarang Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 No one is arguing that Taylor is the long term answer at QB. I'm not, though I bet there are several (including you, Bangarang) who thinks that is what I'm arguing. Try not to assume what I'm thinking. And to be honest, I don't even know what you and others have been arguing about for the last several pages. It's just a barrage of feces being thrown around. I thought you guys would get tired of it eventually but apparently not. However, unlike the unwavering belief that many posters have that they have to "stick to their guns" and dig into their foxholes, I think Taylor still could be the long term answer. This isn't surprising. The Miami game seemed to suck you back in.
r00tabaga Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 This isn't surprising. The Miami game seemed to suck you back in. Wow. The defense has no further questions your honor.
Big Gun Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 . However, unlike the unwavering belief that many posters have that they have to "stick to their guns" and dig into their foxholes, I think Taylor still could be the long term answer.
transplantbillsfan Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 I don't care if fans want to Billieve. My issue is if the Bills front office understands how to evaluate QBs. If McDermott ties himself to Tyrod he will fail. And fans will have 3 more wasted years. As always, speaking in absolutes as you mistakenly do...
Recommended Posts