jeffismagic Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I still think he is our first round pick Mike Williams will beat up NFL corners and take their lunch money.
Houston's #1 Bills Fan Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 Mike Williams will beat up NFL corners and take their lunch money. That's sounds like a bully!! (now, where have I hear that before?)
buffaloboyinATL Posted March 16, 2017 Author Posted March 16, 2017 That would suck if he was.yes, as a Bills fan it is natural to fear early first round draft picks named Mike Williams. 😛
dave mcbride Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I still think he is our first round pick ... but it is objectively pretty slow.
Kirby Jackson Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 That's in line with guys like Kelvin Benjamin. Williams is a smaller but has those elite ball skills. I would have liked to have seen sub 4.5 but not bad.
Rodrigo Borgia Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 The fans don't want him though. They want a QB, or trade down and take "The Next Rob Gronkowski," OJ Howard.
aristocrat Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I wonder if Davis can beat him Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JohnBonhamRocks Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 Will likely neither help or hurt his stock. About what I would expect a big possession receiver to run.
VirginiaMike Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I would rather see Davis at #10 than Williams. Mike William does have good ball skills and out-fights college DBs for the ball. He does not get alot of separation. I doubt he can dominate pro corners the way he did college. Just my opinion.
NewEra Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I get it if we pick him, but I hope he's not the pick. Rather Foster, Adams, hooker, Allen or Davis if they fall. If not, trade down
Mr. WEO Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 Mike Williams will beat up NFL corners and take their lunch money. He will be hurdling Gilmore all day Sunday...
Rodrigo Borgia Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I get it if we pick him, but I hope he's not the pick. Rather Foster, Adams, hooker, Allen or Davis if they fall. If not, trade down Only in your dreams will Jonathan Allen, Jamal Adams or Malik Hooker fall to 10. Foster and Davis will definitely be there, though.
JohnBonhamRocks Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I would rather see Davis at #10 than Williams. Mike William does have good ball skills and out-fights college DBs for the ball. He does not get alot of separation. I doubt he can dominate pro corners the way he did college. Just my opinion. the key and maybe the difference between who we pick and don't pick
Maury Ballstein Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 (edited) Can he run block well ? Edited March 16, 2017 by Ryan L Billz
947 Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 Kelvin Benjamin also ran a 4.53 at his Pro Day in 2014. He doesn't get much separation at all, and is only slighly more than a jump-ball specialist. I say No to Mike Williams at #10. A top-10 WR has to be able to get separation againbst NFL CBs, Corey Davis or best available non-WR.
BigBuff423 Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I'm not a fan because of what it would cost, as in the 10th pick - assuming he's still there, and I'm not even fully convinced he'll be an impact player in his first year. I am a fan of trading down and using the BPA idea. Teams in recent years, namely the Seahawks and Pats don't use high picks on WRs or TEs. I firmly believe, much more in the modern NFL, WRs are becoming more like the RBs in that you can find a decent WR anywhere, it's the system, it's the QB, and it's about how those two things are coached. I say this every year when someone wants to draft a top 10 TE: they do not value at anywhere until the 3rd round. Except for Tony Gonzalez and now Gronk (both, extremely rare exceptions to the rule), all of the valuable and productive TEs were 3rd and 4th round picks. Look them up, it's amazing really - no matter their talent, speed, vertical skills, etc., - it proves to be a position that just takes a 2-3 years to get productivity from, even the special ones. So, go Safety, LB, DT/DE and then take a WR with an extra 3rd you gain by trading back. Just my .02
aristocrat Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 Kelvin Benjamin also ran a 4.53 at his Pro Day in 2014. He doesn't get much separation at all, and is only slighly more than a jump-ball specialist. I say No to Mike Williams at #10. A top-10 WR has to be able to get separation againbst NFL CBs, Corey Davis or best available non-WR. Kb was spoken of as a bad route runner and would have trouble in the NFL but has two years both right at. 1000 yards. I'd take that Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Recommended Posts