Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

10 catches last year, but 4 for TD's. This is another indictment on TT. I'm glad TT is back (nothing else out there). But TT REALLY needs to step it up this year and read the entire field instead of locking in on one guy. I see Hunter getting 7+ TD's with the Steelers next season.

 

I hope we don't reach and go WR at #10.

 

http://www.espn.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/90889/justin-hunters-size-and-speed-intriguing-for-steelers-offense

 

 

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

10 catches last year, but 4 for TD's. This is another indictment on TT. I'm glad TT is back (nothing else out there). But TT REALLY needs to step it up this year and read the entire field instead of locking in on one guy. I see Hunter getting 7+ TD's with the Steelers next season.

 

I hope we don't reach and go WR at #10.

 

http://www.espn.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/90889/justin-hunters-size-and-speed-intriguing-for-steelers-offense

 

 

Reach? what does that mean?

Posted

10 catches last year, but 4 for TD's. This is another indictment on TT. I'm glad TT is back (nothing else out there). But TT REALLY needs to step it up this year and read the entire field instead of locking in on one guy. I see Hunter getting 7+ TD's with the Steelers next season.

 

I hope we don't reach and go WR at #10.

 

http://www.espn.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/90889/justin-hunters-size-and-speed-intriguing-for-steelers-offense

 

 

Wow the Steelers offer a FA a contract and this is TT's fault? Kind of a reach there

Posted

If we wanted Hunter back we would have signed him by now

 

Its just more proof to me that we are taking one of these really good WR's at 10.....we have our number 1 and plenty of number 3's on this team

You have a number one WR? You're advocating using a top 10 pick on WR2? That's bad, I don't care who the QB is.

Posted

Yes there are so many similarities of Trent to TT.....I can totally see the comparison

You would

Don't you mean TrINT? :lol:

Posted (edited)

We probably didn't offer him much.

I'm glad he picked Pittsburgh over NE, it's a better chance for him to get playing time as they move on from Wheaton and possibly Bryant.

Edited by JimKellyTryouts
Posted

I'll answer that. Yes if the value meets the spot or trade down and take what you need.

If WR is BPA when the Bills pick then the obvious thing to do would be trade down, unless of course the decisions makers aren't sold on Watkins long term.

Posted

I asked if you want the Bills to use the 10th pick overall on trying to find a WR2?

Sorry for the snarky response

 

I think I would like to use the 10th pick on the best player available at a position of need.....which I think is going to end up being Clemson's Williams or Corey Davis

 

To me it is not about finding WR2....it is about finding WR 1A which I think eiher of those pass catcher's are. I am tired of getting into the season and not having quality wrs to throw to because of injury. I fully expect Sammy Watkins to be available to us BUT just in case we need a quality guy that we can lean on in the passing game.

 

Now before I get the responses of "Well TT doesnt use them anyway" I would actually like to SEE a season of starting pass catcher's on the field before saying he cant use them.

 

I dont want a corner at 10.....that is spinning our wheels and there are good ones through the whole draft

we are good ont he DL

taking a qb at 10 would not be taking best player available

there are no LB's worthy of the 10th pick

Hot take: I don't think he will make the team.

Yolo...that was my first thought as well

×
×
  • Create New...