Chuck Wagon Posted March 15, 2017 Posted March 15, 2017 Put 20 more lbs on him and move him to center. Seattle loves attempting to find olinemen through creative avenues.
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted March 15, 2017 Posted March 15, 2017 William "the refrigerator" Perry played RB once, he was well over 300 lbs does that count?
CanadianFan Posted March 15, 2017 Author Posted March 15, 2017 Bettis was more like 275-280. I cant stand him, beyond over rated IMO. Bettis was built like a barrel. And also had a half decent line to run behind didn't he? can't remember those steelers lines but I always thought Steelers had decent lines back in the days. Even then he wasn't always effective. Except when he faced the pathetic Jills. Then their O line would blow our D line up and nobody in the secondary can tackle him. ,,,the Nigerian Nightmare was 6'1", 253 ibs for KC Chiefs, but he was ripped...........LMAO...just read a story calling Eddie the Seahawks new "Feast Mode"....... LOL FEAST MODE!
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 15, 2017 Posted March 15, 2017 Bettis was built like a barrel. And also had a half decent line to run behind didn't he? can't remember those steelers lines but I always thought Steelers had decent lines back in the days. Even then he wasn't always effective. Except when he faced the pathetic Jills. Then their O line would blow our D line up and nobody in the secondary can tackle him. LOL FEAST MODE! ...doesn't look like his water broke yet.............
CowgirlsFan Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 Man...You ought to see the things on Facebook!
starrymessenger Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 Bettis was built like a barrel. And also had a half decent line to run behind didn't he? can't remember those steelers lines but I always thought Steelers had decent lines back in the days. Even then he wasn't always effective. Except when he faced the pathetic Jills. Then their O line would blow our D line up and nobody in the secondary can tackle him. LOL FEAST MODE! Too fat to push away from the table I guess. When he goes camping the bears hide their food.
Formerly Allan in MD Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 William "the refrigerator" Perry played RB once, he was well over 300 lbs does that count? Played it more than once.
TheFunPolice Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 Bettis was built like a barrel. And also had a half decent line to run behind didn't he? can't remember those steelers lines but I always thought Steelers had decent lines back in the days. Even then he wasn't always effective. Except when he faced the pathetic Jills. Then their O line would blow our D line up and nobody in the secondary can tackle him. LOL FEAST MODE! On the plus side: no real chance of rib injuries
YoloinOhio Posted March 17, 2017 Posted March 17, 2017 China food though @fieldyates Eddie Lacy's weight incentives breakdown ($55k for each month achieved) May: 255 lbs June & August: 250 lbs September-December: 245 lbs
Buffalo86 Posted March 17, 2017 Posted March 17, 2017 Larry is a name that isn't as popular anymore which is a shame. It needs to make a comeback. If there's a name in need of a comeback, it would have to be Shemp.
JohnC Posted March 17, 2017 Posted March 17, 2017 China food though @fieldyates Eddie Lacy's weight incentives breakdown ($55k for each month achieved) May: 255 lbs June & August: 250 lbs September-December: 245 lbs When you have to pay bonuses to someone to stay in shape you are betting on a losing proposition. Lacy is a wasted talent. Whether he makes the designated weight or not he will never be what he could be as a player. I'll take the average talent who gives it his all over the talented player who doesn't play to his talent level. I'm not trying to moralize here. My point is when a team puts itself in a position to count on an irresponsible person then the team is putting itself in a vulnerable position. It's not worth it especially where there are a lot of adequate backs to choose from.
YoloinOhio Posted March 17, 2017 Posted March 17, 2017 Is this photoshopped? Lolno,he said it was a bad angle
spillerhighlife Posted March 17, 2017 Posted March 17, 2017 no,he said it was a bad angle I dont think there is a good angle. Dude looks like he could eat #92 and still have some room in that belly.
CanadianFan Posted March 17, 2017 Author Posted March 17, 2017 On the plus side: no real chance of rib injuries lol I wish we had those tick marks for thumbs up on posts!
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 17, 2017 Posted March 17, 2017 Too fat to push away from the table I guess. When he goes camping the bears hide their food. ....too close to the sterno in the buffet line and we're talkin' MAJOR grease fire...uh oh......
Recommended Posts