jeffismagic Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 The more i read about this nonsense the more i begin to believe that the combine is nothing more than a distraction/circus to hide all of the illegal tampering/backhanded deals that GMs do during the dog and pony show. Says the guy with the TT avatar.
bobobonators Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 Says the guy with the TT avatar. What does that have to do with anything pertaining to Watson and his velocity?
Marty McFly Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 Watson will never make it in the NFL Damn brehhhh!! i understand why you said that but take it easy! remember there is a person inside that helmet!
BarleyNY Posted March 11, 2017 Author Posted March 11, 2017 (edited) Who knows what any of this means? I love to know what Tom Brady or Joe Montana velocity was when they started in the NFL? All I know is Tyrod Taylor throws an excellent deep ball, considering the wind in Buffalo. Mahomes maybe long gone by 44? Brady fell so far in the draft in part due to a perceived weak arm. Velocity wasn't measured at the time. He made corrections that fixed the problem. He definitely does not have a weak arm now. I'm not sure what was done, the coaches must've fixed his mechanics and probably some sort of (ahem) strength training was involved. In his first season it was noted how much his functional arm strength improved so quickly. Edited March 11, 2017 by BarleyNY
jeffismagic Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 Brady fell so far in the draft in part due to a perceived weak arm. Velocity wasn't measured at the time. He made corrections that fixed the problem. He definitely does not have a weak arm. I'm not sure what was done, the coaches must've fixed his mechanics and probably some sort of strength training was involved. In his first season it was noted how much his functional arm strength improved so quickly. Human Growth Hormone.
BarleyNY Posted March 11, 2017 Author Posted March 11, 2017 Human Growth Hormone. Likely something like that was involved. It happened so quickly.
jeffismagic Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 Likely something like that was involved. It happened so quickly. Who really knows? But my cousin went to Michigan and watched every Tom Brady college game and said he was not the same player at all. Very strange how a guy gets an arm AFTER getting drafted. Doesn't happen anywhere else.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 (edited) 16 for '16: College football QBs with the strongest arms 1. Chad Kelly, Ole Miss There’s recent video proof of Kelly's arm strength, not that we needed more convincing about his ability in that area. The Rebels quarterback last week posted a clip to Instagram of him chucking a ball 76 yards down the field after a 5-yard running start. The nephew of Pro Football Hall of Famer Jim Kelly made a lot of challenging throws outside the numbers in his first season as Ole Miss' starter. He had a completion percentage of 64.9 on such throws and had 35 20-yard completions outside the numbers in 2015, leading all Power Five QBs in both categories. http://www.nfl.com/photoessays/0ap3000000665982 Edited March 11, 2017 by Buffalo Barbarian
BarleyNY Posted March 11, 2017 Author Posted March 11, 2017 Who really knows? But my cousin went to Michigan and watched every Tom Brady college game and said he was not the same player at all. Very strange how a guy gets an arm AFTER getting drafted. Doesn't happen anywhere else. Kinda like that legendary 1974 Steelers draft class. 5 HOF players. Oh, and by the way, they were all juicing. Steroids weren't banned yet and the Steelers really pioneered their use. Some teams and coaches are very adept at determining what players can make a big jump with a little help from the chemists.
cd1 Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 (edited) Regardless of what it means for success in the NFL, what about success at New Era Field with it's swirling winds? The Bills need QBs that can overcome that WIND. Flutterballs just won't cut it. Edited March 11, 2017 by cd1
YoloinOhio Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 Watson's number doesn't surprise me. he has enough arm but he doesn't throw a fastball.
Magox Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 He'll make it well before Mahomes does. I don't believe that will be the case.
mannc Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 (edited) I'm skeptical of any metric that tells me Colt McCoy has as strong an arm as Cam Newton. Nevertheless, it does seem to have value as a cutoff point. Having a really strong arm doesn't mean you're going to make it in the league, but if you can't fire it at least 54 MPH, there's not much hope. Similar to 40 yard dash times for WRs, it would seem. Edited March 11, 2017 by mannc
dave mcbride Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 Velocity and arm strength are just one component. But looking back at the last 5 drafts I don't see one success from a QB in the NFL with a velocity under 55 mph. I don't disagree at all that it's a warning sign. But a lot of velocity comes from mechanics. People blather on and on about Brady juicing, but it's a simple fact that the guy worked like a demon on his mechanics. I'm skeptical of any metric that tells me Colt McCoy has as strong an arm as Cam Newton. Nevertheless, it does seem to have value as a cutoff point. Having a really strong arm doesn't mean you're going to make it in the league, but if you can't fire it at least 54 MPH, there's not much hope. Similar to 40 yard dash times for WRs, it would seem. Again, who had velocity training and who didn't? My bet is that McCoy received more than Newton going in, who had a pretty checkered life up until that point. Newton clearly has a stronger arm.
Chicken Boo Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 Does this actually matter or is this just another number that people pretend is more important than it really is? What does the game tape tell us? That's what I care about more than anything. ^this There's far more to the game than "the best arm since Farve".
Mr. WEO Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 Interesting. Tyron threw 50 but I wonder if he somehow throws harder now? Here is a good analysis on QB velocities since '08 http://rotoviz.com/2016/04/does-ball-velocity-tell-us-anything-about-qb-success-rates/?hvid=3XXMPT This pretty much seals the uselessness of this metric. MAybe we should go back to "hand size".
dave mcbride Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 (edited) This pretty much seals the uselessness of this metric. MAybe we should go back to "hand size". No the metric is great. The problem is that qbs receive wildly varying training. Measure them 2-3 years into their nfl careers (when they've all received pretty similar training) and then judge. It's a scout's job not just to assess combine velocity, but to project where it might be with the proper training. Velocity in and of itself is hugely important. Plus it's pretty obvious that 55 is good enough -- the equivalent of a 90-91 mph fastball pitcher who succeeds if he "knows how to pitch." Throwing 60 is like one of those 100 mph throwers - if they can't do other things, they end up as mid game relievers. High velocity isn't necessary, but adequate (ie, good) velocity is an absolute requirement. The final chart told me a lot about Connor Cook, who looks like a far worse thrower than i thought he'd be. Edited March 11, 2017 by dave mcbride
jeffismagic Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 People don't seem to understand this at all. How hard a QB throws is not the only component needed to play QB at the NFL. But throwing the ball under 55 is like a WR running a 4.7. It's a huge red flag and needs to be looked at.
Mr. WEO Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 No the metric is great. The problem is that qbs receive wildly varying training. Measure them 2-3 years into their nfl careers (when they've all received pretty similar training) and then judge. It's a scout's job not just to assess combine velocity, but to project where it might be with the proper training. Velocity in and of itself is hugely important. Look at that list of the top 25%ile in that article. It's a sad list, some several years into their careers. Velocity didn't help these guys.
mannc Posted March 11, 2017 Posted March 11, 2017 (edited) No the metric is great. The problem is that qbs receive wildly varying training. Measure them 2-3 years into their nfl careers (when they've all received pretty similar training) and then judge. It's a scout's job not just to assess combine velocity, but to project where it might be with the proper training. Velocity in and of itself is hugely important.I think we agree that it can be a useful metric, but with all due respect, you're just speculating WRT the training these guys might or might not be getting. I would imagine they are all working on their velocity going into the combine, knowing that scouts will be paying attention to it. Edited March 11, 2017 by mannc
Recommended Posts