Blokestradamus Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Ross shouldn't even be in the discussion. Why not? One of the few traits that Tyrod has that I like is a good deep ball. Why not get him a dynamic vertical threat?
Clyde Smith Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 I think a trade down is possible. So to me I would say Ross is the likely pick out of the three.
Eric Moulds on my A** Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 I like Mike Williams due to his prototypical size (losing Hunter would make this even more meaningful) and his connection to Watkins. The familiarity these two have coming from Clemson and the high regard Williams has for Sammy could push the two of them to be more competitive in practice, more accountability when studying film and less of a battle for positioning in the WR hierarchy. However, Id be very happy with Corey Davis too. Kid is simply a stud WR that would be an immediate impact player for our team. John Ross is fast, very fast... but so is Listenbee and he's a relative unknown for us after sitting last year injured. I'd be pissed if we grabbed him at 10. The other two, not so much.
Starr Almighty Posted March 10, 2017 Author Posted March 10, 2017 Why not? One of the few traits that Tyrod has that I like is a good deep ball. Why not get him a dynamic vertical threat? Judging by the 53 votes in the poll you did'nt seem to pick him over the other 2 choices either.
Blokestradamus Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Judging by the 53 votes in the poll you did'nt seem to pick him over the other 2 choices either. I voted for Davis because he's the best WR in the class by some margin. Doesn't mean that I'm going to question the legitimacy of Ross' inclusion though. Hell, I'd probably like him over Williams if his injury history wasn't so bad.
PurpLegacy Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 I know the guys that make these mock drafts are usually wrong, but I like to read the articles for entertainment value. They also give you a lot of insight on the players. That being said I am now seeing John Ross as the pick at 10 more often than not. Im against this pick myself. I've had enough of the little fast guy that in our case is usually injured. John Ross 5'11 (Great speed and can catch) Mike Williams 6'3 (not the fastest guy but can win jump balls) Corey Davis 6'2 (Reminds me of a Moulds type of player) Of course if Hooker or Adams were to fall I'd take them over these guys. Mike Williams is actually 6'4" and Corey Davis is 6'3". I say go with Corey Davis.
JMF2006 Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 I chose Davis. If Williams didn't have that significant neck injury hanging over him it would be a coin flip. But that injury changes everything so Corey Davis is the man
thunderingsquid Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 I don't think we can go wrong either way but I'm a Davis guy. I wonder what Sammy would say. Besides "ouch, my foot".
BillsCelticsAngelsBama Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 (edited) Davis, not even close. Williams, though my namesake, is not a route runner. But if Justin Hunter goes to New England, or anywhere else for that matter, we need a TD presence in the Red Zone, so Williams would be an assett there Can we just go defense. WR can be had later but stud safety, Reuben Foster, Solomon Thomas, Derek Barnett, Malik Hooker or any of that ilk can not be found as easily IMO. Edited March 10, 2017 by MOVALLEYRANDY
Alphadawg7 Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Davis or Williams would be great picks at 10, I prefer Davis but would not be disappointed with Williams. I do really like John Ross, I just wouldn't pick him over Davis and there is no chance John Ross lasts until our 2nd pick iMO, so don't really see any path where we draft him. If either S is on the board at 10, I think they likely end up being the pick and we will target a DB and WR most likely in rounds 2 and 3 in no particular order. If both Safeties are gone (and I think they will be), I think it will come down to one of the WR's of Williams/Davis, Lattimore, or Foster. I would be fine with any of those picks. Darkhorse: I did not think OJ Howard would be in play at 10 with Clay here, but with us being linked to guys like Bennett, Cook, etc in FA it makes me wonder about whether or not they would strongly consider Howard at 10 if the 2 safeties are gone.
BillsCelticsAngelsBama Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Davis or Williams would be great picks at 10, I prefer Davis but would not be disappointed with Williams. I do really like John Ross, I just wouldn't pick him over Davis and there is no chance John Ross lasts until our 2nd pick iMO, so don't really see any path where we draft him. If either S is on the board at 10, I think they likely end up being the pick and we will target a DB and WR most likely in rounds 2 and 3 in no particular order. If both Safeties are gone (and I think they will be), I think it will come down to one of the WR's of Williams/Davis, Lattimore, or Foster. I would be fine with any of those picks. Darkhorse: I did not think OJ Howard would be in play at 10 with Clay here, but with us being linked to guys like Bennett, Cook, etc in FA it makes me wonder about whether or not they would strongly consider Howard at 10 if the 2 safeties are gone. Agree but really desire some stoppers first... WANT defense. But the 10th best player in this draft should be a big contributor right away, no matter the position
BillsFanMike Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 I say Chris Godwin from Penn State in the 2nd or 3rd round. That would be my pick.
JohnBonhamRocks Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Anyone else think Engram could be a TE/WR?
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Ross shouldn't even be in the discussion. Like Williams and Davis equally but I don't go WR, with Tyrod Unless we bring in a decent free agent, we are going to have to address the position within the first two rounds.
BuffaloBud420 Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Why not? One of the few traits that Tyrod has that I like is a good deep ball. Why not get him a dynamic vertical threat? Cause he is not a good WR
RaoulDuke79 Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 I'll go with Williams, although that name brings back bad memories.
Blokestradamus Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Cause he is not a good WR Oh. Well, that settles it, I guess.
Recommended Posts