SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted May 31, 2017 Posted May 31, 2017 There is some good tin foil hat material here. Both sides lie, cheat and steal. They'll switch parties at the drop of the hat if it gets them or keeps them elected. pretending one side is better than the other ...... not a good thing imo.
boyst Posted May 31, 2017 Posted May 31, 2017 There is some good tin foil hat material here. Both sides lie, cheat and steal. They'll switch parties at the drop of the hat if it gets them or keeps them elected. pretending one side is better than the other ...... not a good thing imo. middle of the road! Yes. Stay that course!!!!
Foxx Posted May 31, 2017 Posted May 31, 2017 there is a reason why the parties are called 'wings'. it's that bird in the middle that they're both attached to that you would be wise to keep your eye upon.
/dev/null Posted May 31, 2017 Posted May 31, 2017 there is a reason why the parties are called 'wings'. it's that bird in the middle that they're both attached to that you would be wise to keep your eye upon.
Foxx Posted May 31, 2017 Posted May 31, 2017 (edited) i prefer this one can i post this? Edited May 31, 2017 by Foxx
DC Tom Posted June 1, 2017 Posted June 1, 2017 But in reality it's more like this. Ever see the logo for his photography studio?
snafu Posted June 1, 2017 Posted June 1, 2017 But in reality it's more like this. David Winfield approves.
Chef Jim Posted June 1, 2017 Posted June 1, 2017 Ever see the logo for his photography studio? Holy crap I thought that was a joke. Great concert photos. I'm usually up front at concerts behind the photographers. I'd be pissed off if he was in front of me taking pictures.
Nanker Posted September 20, 2017 Author Posted September 20, 2017 Trump was wiretapped. End of story. https://youtu.be/FePQjzz3x8Y https://youtu.be/rCUQS8LIhq4
Tiberius Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Trump was wiretapped. End of story. https://youtu.be/FePQjzz3x8Y https://youtu.be/rCUQS8LIhq4 Gee, why was that? Was it because he was getting paid by Putin? Laundering money stolen from Ukraine?
Nanker Posted September 20, 2017 Author Posted September 20, 2017 James Comey lied to Congress while he was under oath. "This means the wiretapping was authorized more than ten months ago and perhaps more than a year ago. It was presumably a tough decision for a judge to issue a secret warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, enabling the administration to spy on someone connected with the presidential campaign of its political adversaries. One would presumably only approve such an order if the request presented by the executive branch was highly compelling and likely to produce evidence that the subject of the wiretap was in fact working with Russia to disrupt U.S. elections. Roughly a year later, as the public still waits for such evidence, this column wonders how this judge is feeling now, especially now that CNN has reported that at least two of its three sources believe the resulting evidence is inconclusive. It seems reasonable for the public to know exactly which officials made this decision and who else they consulted or informed of their surveillance plans. Was the President briefed on the details of this investigation?"
Koko78 Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 James Comey lied to Congress while he was under oath. "This means the wiretapping was authorized more than ten months ago and perhaps more than a year ago. It was presumably a tough decision for a judge to issue a secret warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, enabling the administration to spy on someone connected with the presidential campaign of its political adversaries. One would presumably only approve such an order if the request presented by the executive branch was highly compelling and likely to produce evidence that the subject of the wiretap was in fact working with Russia to disrupt U.S. elections. Roughly a year later, as the public still waits for such evidence, this column wonders how this judge is feeling now, especially now that CNN has reported that at least two of its three sources believe the resulting evidence is inconclusive. It seems reasonable for the public to know exactly which officials made this decision and who else they consulted or informed of their surveillance plans. Was the President briefed on the details of this investigation?" I doubt the unaccountable judge, conducting court in secret, gives a !@#$.
row_33 Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Everything is wiretapped and has been since FDR's age of technological innovation. To pretend otherwise as the MSM keeps doing is beyond pathetic. What is done with the findings is the issue. Told y'all so, again (for the 1,000,000th time)
Tiberius Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 So did Trump know Manafort was/had been working for Putin when fired Comey? Is that why he fired him?
B-Man Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 FTA: It was in March when Trump made that explosive claim, and the Democratic media rushed to denounce him even before Obama did. Subsequent denials from then-FBI boss James Comey and other Obama aides all were rock-solid in declaring that no such thing had happened. There was no wiggle room in their denials, some of which were made under oath before Congress. But something certainly happened. And what if it was the worst imaginable something? What if the Republican candidate for president was put under surveillance by a Democratic administration that was trying to elect another Democrat? There was reason to suspect that was true before the Manafort reports added fuel to the fire. Recall that, starting last fall, continuing throughout the transition and into the early months of the administration, much of the media was obsessed with the narrative that “Russia hacked the election and Trump colluded.” It was a feeding frenzy of reports naming various Trump associates who had any contacts with Russians. It was guilt by association, all based on leaks of classified secrets that originated either in law enforcement or intelligence agencies, or the Obama White House. As I wrote back in April, at least six people from the campaign, including Trump himself, were identified in various reports as having been picked up in intercepted communications. Always, the reports insisted that the Americans were not the targets of the surveillance, that they were “incidentally” picked up while talking to targets. Those six included Gen. Mike Flynn, Trump’s first national security adviser, then-Senator and now-Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Jared Kushner. Another was Carter Page, briefly a Trump adviser, and Manafort. But since then, media reports say that Page was, in fact, being surveilled under a FISA warrant. And now we learn that Manafort was, too. So those initial reports about the Trumpsters being “incidentally” picked up were wrong. Fake news, you might say, because Manafort and Page were FBI targets whose communications were being intercepted — and the media’s sources had to have known that. That the public has been lied to repeatedly is beyond doubt. Recall also that Susan Rice, Obama’s last national security adviser, initially claimed in interviews to know nothing about the “unmasking” of Americans whose names were picked up in intercepted calls But before Congress, she told a different tale — about needing to know who in Trump’s circle met with a visiting official from the United Arab Emirates, and so she “unmasked” their names. More at the link http://nypost.com/2017/09/19/wiretaps-may-prove-trump-right-and-thats-absolutely-terrifying/
Tiberius Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 If Manafort was at the collusion meeting at Trump Tower, is it really a surprise that those looking into criminal activity picked him up talking to other Trump officials? I mean, duh. And the allegation this wire tapping was done for political purposes is just throwing sh it at a fan on the level of Pizzagate and Seth Rich's murder by Hillary. Manafort is as dirty as they come. Trump's administration might be the most corrupt ever. If Trump fired Comey over Manafort's Russian ties...
grinreaper Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 If Manafort was at the collusion meeting at Trump Tower, is it really a surprise that those looking into criminal activity picked him up talking to other Trump officials? I mean, duh. And the allegation this wire tapping was done for political purposes is just throwing sh it at a fan on the level of Pizzagate and Seth Rich's murder by Hillary. Manafort is as dirty as they come. Trump's administration might be the most corrupt ever. If Trump fired Comey over Manafort's Russian ties... You really are a dumbass. What criteria do you use to call that meeting at Trump Tower a "collusion meeting"?
Recommended Posts