Tiberius Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 [This is an automated response.] So now we're going to play the rhetorical game where the President isn't responsible for anything else the executive branch does? I'll remember that the next time you blame something on Trump personally that he personally had nothing to do with. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7. And the title of this post being Obama spied on Trump. Ok! You are such a moron!!
DC Tom Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 And the title of this post being Obama spied on Trump. Ok! You are such a moron!! [This is an automated response.] So now we're going to play the rhetorical game where the President isn't responsible for anything else the executive branch does? I'll remember that the next time you blame something on Trump personally that he personally had nothing to do with. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7.
B-Man Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 (edited) Reminder.............as Tom has pointed out several times................this is not news, but Trump recycling established news. Flashback: New York Times front page from 1/20 Click on to enlarge Edited March 6, 2017 by B-Man
Nanker Posted March 6, 2017 Author Posted March 6, 2017 By my count it would come out to 3.5. Oh no! You didn't! [This is an automated response.] So now we're going to play the rhetorical game where the President isn't responsible for anything else the executive branch does? I'll remember that the next time you blame something on Trump personally that he personally had nothing to do with. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7. Woo-hoo! An update! Reminder.............as Tom has pointed out several times................this is not news, but Trump recycling established news. Flashback: New York Times front page from 1/20 Click on to enlarge Common B-Man stop obfuscating. Hillary was tipped off by the B. O. Whitehouse about this. Guess when? Right, just after Bill met Sweet Loretta Modern on the tarmac to discuss their grandchildren.
Guest Diesel-USMC Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Oh no! You didn't! Woo-hoo! An update! Common B-Man stop obfuscating. Hillary was tipped off by the B. O. Whitehouse about this. Guess when? Right, just after Bill met Sweet Loretta Modern on the tarmac to discuss their grandchildren. Whenever I meet with someone to discuss their grandchildren or the color of their new drapery, I always require us to meet in private on an airplane. Always. That's just good form.
Tiberius Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 [This is an automated response.] So now we're going to play the rhetorical game where the President isn't responsible for anything else the executive branch does? I'll remember that the next time you blame something on Trump personally that he personally had nothing to do with. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7. So more proof that Tom is immune to the truth. Fed Reserve
DC Tom Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 So more proof that Tom is immune to the truth. Fed Reserve [This is an automated response.] You're an idiot. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7.
Nanker Posted March 6, 2017 Author Posted March 6, 2017 Whenever I meet with someone to discuss their grandchildren or the color of their new drapery, I always require us to meet in private on an airplane. Always. That's just good form. To do less, would be uncivilized.
grinreaper Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/russian-hackers-said-to-seek-hush-money-from-liberal-us-groups/ar-AAnSbAZ?li=BBnbcA1 Bloomberg) -- Russian hackers are targeting U.S. progressive groups in a new wave of attacks, scouring the organizations’ emails for embarrassing details and attempting to extract hush money, according to two people familiar with probes being conducted by the FBI and private security firms. At least a dozen groups have faced extortion attempts since the U.S. presidential election, said the people, who provided broad outlines of the campaign. The ransom demands are accompanied by samples of sensitive data in the hackers’ possession. In one case, a non-profit group and a prominent liberal donor discussed how to use grant money to cover some costs for anti-Trump protesters. The identities were not disclosed, and it’s unclear if the protesters were paid. At least some groups have paid the ransoms even though there is little guarantee the documents won’t be made public anyway. Demands have ranged from about $30,000 to $150,000, payable in untraceable bitcoins, according to one of the people familiar with the probe.
Tiberius Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Reminder.............as Tom has pointed out several times................this is not news, but Trump recycling established news. Flashback: New York Times front page from 1/20 Click on to enlarge Ummm, no, you and Then m are both wrong. This is not Obama tapping Trump's phones. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/russian-hackers-said-to-seek-hush-money-from-liberal-us-groups/ar-AAnSbAZ?li=BBnbcA1 Bloomberg) -- Russian hackers are targeting U.S. progressive groups in a new wave of attacks, scouring the organizations’ emails for embarrassing details and attempting to extract hush money, according to two people familiar with probes being conducted by the FBI and private security firms. At least a dozen groups have faced extortion attempts since the U.S. presidential election, said the people, who provided broad outlines of the campaign. The ransom demands are accompanied by samples of sensitive data in the hackers’ possession. In one case, a non-profit group and a prominent liberal donor discussed how to use grant money to cover some costs for anti-Trump protesters. The identities were not disclosed, and it’s unclear if the protesters were paid. At least some groups have paid the ransoms even though there is little guarantee the documents won’t be made public anyway. Demands have ranged from about $30,000 to $150,000, payable in untraceable bitcoins, according to one of the people familiar with the probe. Will Trump call on them on national tv to keep it going? Like when he told them to keep hacking Hillary's people
GG Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 That the previous administration sought permission through FISA and not through another venue speaks volumes about the intentions of BO's motivations. That's why Greggy should note that the increasing volume from the "Deep State" isn't about the bureaucracy rising up against trump, but the bureaucracy purging Obama's plants. It's going to take some time.
Tiberius Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 That the previous administration sought permission through FISA and not through another venue speaks volumes about the intentions of BO's motivations. That's why Greggy should note that the increasing volume from the "Deep State" isn't about the bureaucracy rising up against trump, but the bureaucracy purging Obama's plants. It's going to take some time. The allegations Obama did this are from right wing news sources that offer no evidence
grinreaper Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 The allegations Obama did this are from right wing news sources that offer no evidence Look up thread, you dumbass. The New York Times, that right wing rag reported this on 1-20-17.
DC Tom Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Ummm, no, you and Then m are both wrong. This is not Obama tapping Trump's phones. Will Trump call on them on national tv to keep it going? Like when he told them to keep hacking Hillary's people Hey, !@#$wit, "wiretapping" isn't limited to phones.
Tiberius Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Hey, !@#$wit, "wiretapping" isn't limited to phones. That was not Trump, stupid. That was a Trump associated with known connections to Russia who has sense gone away. Like Flynn went away for Russia stuff, like Sessions had to recuse himself. You said your self this was Trump creating a distraction. Were you lying?
grinreaper Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 That was not Trump, stupid. That was a Trump associated with known connections to Russia who has sense gone away. Like Flynn went away for Russia stuff, like Sessions had to recuse himself. You said your self this was Trump creating a distraction. Were you lying? I think the only "sense" that's gone away is yours, providing you ever had any.
Prickly Pete Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 (edited) I think the only "sense" that's gone away is yours, providing you ever had any. I blocked him long ago, though occasionally I peek at what he posts. He ruins threads with his persistent stupidity. Edited March 6, 2017 by HoF Watkins
reddogblitz Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 I remember a few years ago when Obama's justice department was embarrassed for wiretapping the AP and reporter James Rosen. I think it's at least reasonable to consider that there is an effort to wiretap Trump based on past behavior. Obama also hacked Angela Merkel's cell phone.
Tiberius Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Obama also hacked Angela Merkel's cell phone. Now it's Obama that did that? Ok
Recommended Posts