Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 5/3/2018 at 8:11 PM, njbuff said:

Yeah, the Democratic Party hates white people and crucifies any black person that doesn't follow company policy.

They love the religion of peace which i cant say the name or tibs will call me raysis.

Posted

WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Monday morning, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a new Religious Liberty Task Force in the Department of Justice (DOJ) to defend religious freedom as laid out in last October's memorandum. In his remarks, Sessions referenced the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a threat to religious liberty, suggesting the new task force may investigate or target the left-wing smear group.

 

"A dangerous movement, undetected by many, is now challenging and eroding our great tradition of religious freedom," Sessions declared, adding that this movement "must be confronted and defeated." He also lamented that "one group can actively target religious groups by labeling them a 'hate group' on the basis of their sincerely held religious beliefs."

 

Sessions emphasized that the new Religious Liberty Task Force represents a sea change from the Obama administration, under which federal agencies often used the SPLC "hate group" markings. His direct reference to the SPLC in his remarks suggested that the new Task Force may investigate the left-wing smear group.

 

According to the DOJ, the Task Force will "develop new strategies, involving litigation, policy, and legislation, to protect and promote religious liberty." The DOJ did not respond to PJ Media requests for comment about whether or not this new Task Force would investigate the SPLC, but Christian leaders insisted Sessions' remarks bode ill for the left-wing smear group.

 

"I think that by the Attorney General making this statement today, warning against this dangerous movement, we can predict that the attorney general and the DOJ will take active steps regarding the SPLC," Mat Staver, founder and chairman of the Christian legal nonprofit Liberty Counsel, told PJ Media Monday. Liberty Counsel is suing the charity navigator website GuideStar after it adopted the SPLC "hate group" labels, smearing Liberty Counsel and many others.

 

"My guess is that Sessions is setting the FBI or some outlet of the Justice Department to take an objective look at this whole concept of hate labeling, its impact, its origins, and its legitimacy," Lt. Gen. (Ret.) "Jerry" Boykin, executive vice president of the Family Research Council (FRC), told PJ Media. He suggested the Task Force itself might investigate the SPLC.

 

"The SPLC has targeted religious groups particularly — not exclusively, but particularly Christian groups and Christian individuals — that's why we at FRC were targeted," Boykin explained. The SPLC has marked FRC a "hate group" because the organization supports traditional Christian sexual morality. This marking inspired a terrorist attack against the FRC in 2012.

 

"When you've got an organization in the United States that is illegitimately targeting groups because of their Christian views and you have agencies in the federal government that are legitimizing that data, that is a recipe for disaster," Boykin said, referring to the troubled history of federal agencies relying on SPLC data. On Friday, Fox News' Tucker Carlson reported that the FBI has an "ongoing" relationship with the SPLC.

Posted

I would defer to Tommy Sotomayor and Jesse Lee Peterson for the answer to this.

These two youtube'rs seem to be the only politically incorrect dudes who will report the truth

about racism.

Posted (edited)

The NYPD.

 

From Jan to March of 2018, the NYPD made 4,081 arrests for pot possession. 287 of those were white, although according to FBI data published on their site weed use does not differ substantially by race or ethnicity and further, people generally purchase pot from the people of the same race and or ethnicity. Additionally, arrest rates for pot possession are 4 times higher in Canarsie than they are in Greenpoint, despite police data that shows calls to report use were made by ppl in both neighborhoods at a very similar rate.

 

 

 

 

 

The American criminal justice system.

 

To wit, the 13th amendment:

 

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

 

Well, gee, that makes a nice little incentive to convict now doesn't it?

Edited by Thurmal34
Posted
7 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

The NYPD.

 

From Jan to March of 2018, the NYPD made 4,081 arrests for pot possession. 287 of those were white, although according to FBI data published on their site weed use does not differ substantially by race or ethnicity and further, people generally purchase pot from the people of the same race and or ethnicity. Additionally, arrest rates for pot possession are 4 times higher in Canarsie than they are in Greenpoint, despite police data that shows calls to report use were made by ppl in both neighborhoods at a very similar rate.

 

 

 

 

 

The American criminal justice system.

 

To wit, the 13th amendment:

 

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

 

Well, gee, that makes a nice little incentive to convict now doesn't it?

Nice take, you idiot. Can you think of any reasons why there is a supposed different arrest rate?

Posted

Demanding equality of outcome never works

 

equality of opportunity and equality of protection is all you can hope for in the real world

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

The NYPD.

 

From Jan to March of 2018, the NYPD made 4,081 arrests for pot possession. 287 of those were white, although according to FBI data published on their site weed use does not differ substantially by race or ethnicity and further, people generally purchase pot from the people of the same race and or ethnicity. Additionally, arrest rates for pot possession are 4 times higher in Canarsie than they are in Greenpoint, despite police data that shows calls to report use were made by ppl in both neighborhoods at a very similar rate.

 

 

 

 

 

The American criminal justice system.

 

To wit, the 13th amendment:

 

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

 

Well, gee, that makes a nice little incentive to convict now doesn't it?

What is this saying, white people don't smoke weed as much as other races?

Its probably true. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Kelly101 said:

What is this saying, white people don't smoke weed as much as other races?

Its probably true. 

 

  Other than the most extreme cases I doubt that white people lag behind.  White people most likely infrequently have to buy pot from gangster types who get watched heavily by the law.  I have people that try to sell me pot even though I don't use it.  Not one looks or conducts themselves like a gangster.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Inequality does not mean inequity.

 

Only someone interested in an agenda, as opposed to the truth, would present isolated data absent any context or other supporting facts or data.

 

In addition to other information presented, I'll offer that the overwhelming majority of simple possession charges which are prosecuted are actually plead down to possession from heftier charges involving distribution, are instances where the offender is using in public, or are individuals who are known criminals rather than first time offenders.

 

 

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
6 hours ago, RochesterRob said:

  Other than the most extreme cases I doubt that white people lag behind.  White people most likely infrequently have to buy pot from gangster types who get watched heavily by the law.  I have people that try to sell me pot even though I don't use it.  Not one looks or conducts themselves like a gangster.

Maybe these guys shouldn't dress and/or act like this and their customers wouldn't be arrested

doesn't seem like a racist thing, seems like a thing they bring on themselves.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Kelly101 said:

Maybe these guys shouldn't dress and/or act like this and their customers wouldn't be arrested

doesn't seem like a racist thing, seems like a thing they bring on themselves.

  At the very least non-white pot dealers who run things in a bland and non-flamboyant manner are probably more successful.  They probably learn just like any other business person not all customers are good customers and worth keeping.  A guy lighting up just outside the drug dealer's home is more trouble than he is worth even if he spends heavily. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

CNN simultaneously attempting to prop up 1A while attempting to shame a gift shop over a T-Shirt is incredible even for them.

 

 

 

Quote

2375_84984116216_633511216_2728356_71328David Burge @iowahawkblog Aug 3

That's the hilarious thing, a 30-year old Korean-American woman with Cal & Harvard degrees on NYT Editorial Board pretending to be Eldridge Cleaver. That there's some next-level minstrelsy.
Seoul On Ice!

 

 
 
 
What's awesome is how progressives are defending Harvard Law graduate Sarah Jeong's racism because she's "punching up."
 
A graduate of Harvard Law School. Punching up.
 
My God, the left today . . . . . .
.
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

The NYPD.

 

From Jan to March of 2018, the NYPD made 4,081 arrests for pot possession. 287 of those were white, although according to FBI data published on their site weed use does not differ substantially by race or ethnicity and further, people generally purchase pot from the people of the same race and or ethnicity. Additionally, arrest rates for pot possession are 4 times higher in Canarsie than they are in Greenpoint, despite police data that shows calls to report use were made by ppl in both neighborhoods at a very similar rate.

 

Quote

 Are the calls to report “ use”reporting just that in those neighborhoods? Or do some report dealing and other activities? Bottom line, some folks are just more careful and discreet with their use, purchasing and things like keeping a vehicle maintained properly ( inspection up to date, license plates mounted correctly , all lights functioning etc) in order to not draw attention to themselves. It’s all about not only your attitude toward authority, but knowing how to play “ by the rules” in other areas of life. Most of these busts probably initiated as things like traffic stops or checking into suspicious behavior. The marijuana was found afterward. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don’t know how this happened, but the lower box was my response to thermal ‘s post 

1 hour ago, Kelly101 said:

Maybe these guys shouldn't dress and/or act like this and their customers wouldn't be arrested

doesn't seem like a racist thing, seems like a thing they bring on themselves.

Yep. See my post above. These didn’t start as “ marijuana busts”. Play by the rules in other areas and be discreet. 

8 hours ago, Kelly101 said:

What is this saying, white people don't smoke weed as much as other races?

Its probably true. 

 

No just the opposite. They do. But their behavior probably doesn’t draw attention to them , mostly. 

Edited by Boatdrinks
Posted
1 hour ago, RochesterRob said:

  At the very least non-white pot dealers who run things in a bland and non-flamboyant manner are probably more successful.  They probably learn just like any other business person not all customers are good customers and worth keeping.  A guy lighting up just outside the drug dealer's home is more trouble than he is worth even if he spends heavily. 

 

Clarify something for me: in what world is anyone getting their dope from gangster types?

 

You can get it legally in almost half the country, and the other half of the country doesn't give a crap.  In what world are dope dealers even a thing anymore. Long before it was legal in CA, people smoked it openly pretty much everywhere. Even if police caught you with it, you were safe unless you had a brick in your backpack.

 

Don't misunderstand. I'm not arguing with whatever your larger point might be. But a guy lighting up a joint ANYWHERE is pretty much ignored throughout the country now.

Posted
2 hours ago, RochesterRob said:

  At the very least non-white pot dealers who run things in a bland and non-flamboyant manner are probably more successful.  They probably learn just like any other business person not all customers are good customers and worth keeping.  A guy lighting up just outside the drug dealer's home is more trouble than he is worth even if he spends heavily. 

you do realize we are arguing because people were breaking the law and getting 

arrested for it? How dense can the left get...to blatantly blame the police or racism for 

people breaking the law is pretty dumb. Same issue with illegal immigration, its pretty 

straight forward..or does the concept of lawlessness fit with the lefts idea of socialism?

Posted
On 8/3/2018 at 4:37 PM, Kelly101 said:

GettyImages-823557624-640x480.jpg

Self proclaimed "woman of color"

Also, stupid NY times, she bashed them often too. 

 

 

Asian girls love them some white boys.  Somebody broke her heart once upon a time and she just hasn't gotten over it yet

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
16 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Nice take, you idiot. Can you think of any reasons why there is a supposed different arrest rate?

 

Maybe learn to news?

12 hours ago, Kelly101 said:

What is this saying, white people don't smoke weed as much as other races?

Its probably true. 

 

 

Says white ppl smoke at the exact same rate.

 

What would lead you to believe “it’s probably true”? 

 

A racist institution?

×
×
  • Create New...