Heitz Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 There doesn't need to be an article by Jason L to recognize that there is an internal dispute between the front office and the new coaching staff. There doesn't? What is the obvious signs to you? Is it because they haven't announced if they're cutting or keeping Tyrod? The new coaching staff have had like two press conferences, both of which were pretty generic / coach-speaky, so how do you get any feel of what they're thinking? And they're already in a rift with the people that hired them two months ago? They didn't discuss this in the job interview?? Let's all break out our TBD Jump To Conclusions Mat!
K-9 Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 I'm not bothered by the reporting protocol. What bothers me is that the GM doesn't have the authority to make a decision on a player that he has made a determination on. I'm not also questioning the input the new HC should have on the qb issue. But I do find it somewhat problematic that it appears that the GM doesn't have the final say. I don't think it's bothersome at all. I like the idea of coaches who know better than anyone the kind of players they prefer for their systems to have final say. Whaley could have simply cut TT before he hired McD, but he deferred to the pending analysis by the new staff. After that assessment, if McD walks down the hall and says TT is the guy, then that's the end of it. None of this means that Whaley isn't fully integrated from the standpoint of offering the staff his construction plans in the event they DO keep TT or not. Certain accommodations will need to be made given the strengths and weaknesses in Taylor's game and that impacts your team build moving forward. And we certainly want his input on the relevant cap issues moving forward, etc. But when it comes to a HC saying "this is MY guy" he has to have the unfettered leeway to make that call. And I believe McD indeed has that privilege.
sir andrew Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Next on the Lacanfora hit list: Shady to be cut.
HappyDays Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Didn't La Canfora call the Rex firing and Tyrod benching before anyone else? He could very well have sources. Either way the timeline makes sense. Whaley doesn't like Tyrod but a decision hasn't been reached yet. It can only mean one thing.
reddogblitz Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Once again more fake news.pire speculation. Give us some sources or quotes. Where does all this stuff come from??? Where the sun don't shine.
Heitz Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Next on the Lacanfora hit list: Shady to be cut. "Chasm exists between handler or K balls and Dan Carpenter!" - Film at 11.
Bill_with_it Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Russ Brandon still making personnel decisions!! http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/bills-coaches-execs-remain-split-on-picking-up-tyrod-taylors-30m-option/ INDIANAPOLIS -- The Buffalo Bills are about a week away from another potential franchise-altering decision at quarterback, and its causing considerable consternation within the organization. League sources say a chasm remains between coaches and the front office whether to execute a $30M option on the promising-but-unproven quarterback. As I reported in December, Buffalos decision makers -- general manager Doug Whaley, senior VP of football administration Jim Overdorf and team president Russ Brandon -- decided they didnt want to pay Taylor in 2017. They wanted Taylor out as starter late in last season (he was shut down for Week 17 once owner Terry Pegula fired coach Rex Ryan), and that has not changed. The front office still feels the current salary structure they negotiated themselves a year ago -- instead of a more standard year-to-year, pay-as-you-go format -- doesnt make sense, thus their interest in veteran QB options like Tony Romo and Brian Hoyer. However, new coach Sean McDermott and Pegula have become close. McDermott and his staff are not convinced they will find an upgrade over Taylor and see no problem with paying Taylor $17M a year, the sources say. So, mere months into Buffalos latest regime change, they are at another crossroads of their own making (choosing this contract structure for Taylors extension was puzzling from the start). While I wouldnt underestimate how highly the owner thinks of his new coach, picking up a $30M option is no small thing for even the richest men to consider. And the front-office core Pegula has relied upon for years remains firmly in the dont-pick-up-the-option camp. In the meantime, the Bills continue to monitor the veteran QB market, meeting with agents to gauge price points of free-agent options. Some in that building remain intrigued by the prospect of trading for Romo, though the feasibility is under question and Ive heard Buffalo is not Romos favored locale. Theyll have to decide whether Taylors option is the safest, most prudent route. One thing is for certain -- this coaching staff has no qualms about working with him and would prefer to do so. And Taylor hits the open market I have no doubt he would fare quite well. Russ brandon folks. All star extraoirdinare
blitzboy54 Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 What I find ridiculous is the the half of the organization that structured, signed and promoted that contract are the same people that are now running from it. Indecently these are the same people that have failed for anywhere from 5 to 15+ years. I hope McD sticks to his guns cuz this is groundhog day all over again.
BillsFanInJax Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 New Sheriff In Town. He's doing his due diligence. Good for him. We'll know soon enough. As for the "reports" it's March - the month of Speculation when it comes to NFL football. Crack a beer and relax folks.
K-9 Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 What I find ridiculous is the the half of the organization that structured, signed and promoted that contract are the same people that are now running from it. Indecently these are the same people that have failed for anywhere from 5 to 15+ years. I hope McD sticks to his guns cuz this is groundhog day all over again. Why wouldn't McD stick to his guns? He's in the driver's seat here.
Bray Wyatt Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 New Sheriff In Town. He's doing his due diligence. Good for him. We'll know soon enough. As for the "reports" it's March - the month of Speculation when it comes to NFL football. Crack a beer and relax folks. I am still at work, is that acceptable?
iinii Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Good story, plausible narrative, the soap opera at OBD continues. I would imagine the coaching staff wants to get to work on installing something, anything, but until the Quarterback position has some definition all they can do is plan for contingencies. Whaley wants his guy whoever that is and one thing I think we can all agree on is that ain't Tyrod. If I am Pegs and the children can't play well together I side with Coach on personnel decisions, tell Whaley to work out the acquisition(s) or show him the door. You have to let the chef choose the groceries, because at the end of the day it's the coach who has to answer for the results.
wiskibreth Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 It's not surprising that there's disagreement between he front office and the coaching staff. Pegula: "so fellas what do we do about the QB position?" McDermott: "I can win with this kid" Whaley: "based on what I've seen, I don't want to pay this option" McDermott: "But I can win with this kid" Whaley: "how 'bout I get you a new QB that you can also win with?" McDermott: "OK, who ya got?... and don't tell me rookie!" Whaley: "OK, umm..." McDermott: "Thats what I though..." Pegula: "Well Doug, I think you're going to have to give coach what he wants. Deal with your mess"
Maury Ballstein Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Didn't La Canfora call the Rex firing and Tyrod benching before anyone else? He could very well have sources. Either way the timeline makes sense. Whaley doesn't like Tyrod but a decision hasn't been reached yet. It can only mean one thing. He said Rex would be fired and Tyrod would be benched if they stunk vs Pitt. Both of them stunk vs Pitt, yet Tyrod started the next game and Rex was still employed.
K-9 Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Good story, plausible narrative, the soap opera at OBD continues. I would imagine the coaching staff wants to get to work on installing something, anything, but until the Quarterback position has some definition all they can do is plan for contingencies. Whaley wants his guy whoever that is and one thing I think we can all agree on is that ain't Tyrod. If I am Pegs and the children can't play well together I side with Coach on personnel decisions, tell Whaley to work out the acquisition(s) or show him the door. You have to let the chef choose the groceries, because at the end of the day it's the coach who has to answer for the results. Especially when the chef reports directly to and has the ear of the restaurant owner. Bottom line is if Whaley doesn't agree with McD, so be it. But if he's gonna squawk and be unprofessional about it, and there's no reason to think he would at this point, then he'll be fired.
Augie Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 It is written by LaCanfora, so I doubt it is true All I needed to know, thanks for saving me the click. They've got to write something, right? There's no penalty for being wrong, so.....
racketmaster Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 This report makes sense. I have felt all along that Whaley would like to move on from Taylor while McDermott/Dennison would like to keep Taylor. We will find out soon who wins this battle. If Whaley does win out, he better be right or he will be the first if things go south.
Heitz Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 Sources: Chasm between reality, LaConforta on Bills news...
Augie Posted March 3, 2017 Posted March 3, 2017 I am still at work, is that acceptable? Sure, tell them I said it was OK.
Recommended Posts