Stussy109 Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 If our plan is to let Gilmore walk, (most likely resulting in a 3rd round compensatory pick in 2018) why not tag him.with the more affordable transition Tage and trade him for a 1st or 2nd round pick this year? Similar to what we did with Peerless Price years ago.
jahbonas Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 The transition tag is rarely used by NFL franchises. There are two reasons for this. The first is that the one-year transition offer is typically a large amount, which could provide the club with difficulties while attempting to keep the team's aggregate salaries under the salary cap. The other is that players often react badly to receiving the tag, because it limits their ability to negotiate with other teams and therefore hinders their chances of receiving the largest possible contract. Players sometimes counter the tag by holding out or refusing to play for the club, creating distractions and headaches for the club.
Saxum Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 IMO we will have another Byrd situation if any tag is placed on Gilmore - he will either refuse to sign it until week 10 or sign it day before opener meaning he does not need to participate in training camp and preseason making him out of sync with new defense scheme no matter how much fellow DBs "keep him informed". I am generally for teams exercising their rights agreed to by the players' representatives, the NFLPA, but in this case cannot see any benefit to Bills. I guess it depends on how much new coaching staff views Gilmore as essential to their plans.
dwight in philly Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 The transition tag is rarely used by NFL franchises. There are two reasons for this. The first is that the one-year transition offer is typically a large amount, which could provide the club with difficulties while attempting to keep the team's aggregate salaries under the salary cap. The other is that players often react badly to receiving the tag, because it limits their ability to negotiate with other teams and therefore hinders their chances of receiving the largest possible contract. Players sometimes counter the tag by holding out or refusing to play for the club, creating distractions and headaches for the club. and gilmore is not the team player, to say the least.. i would submit he would pout and B word more .. play even less aggressive , if that is possible. jmo
YoloinOhio Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 The transition tag is rarely used by NFL franchises. There are two reasons for this. The first is that the one-year transition offer is typically a large amount, which could provide the club with difficulties while attempting to keep the team's aggregate salaries under the salary cap. The other is that players often react badly to receiving the tag, because it limits their ability to negotiate with other teams and therefore hinders their chances of receiving the largest possible contract. Players sometimes counter the tag by holding out or refusing to play for the club, creating distractions and headaches for the club.i would add that another reason teams don't use it is that players who are lost after being transition tagged do not factor into the comp pick formula.
Bill from NYC Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 If our plan is to let Gilmore walk, (most likely resulting in a 3rd round compensatory pick in 2018) why not tag him.with the more affordable transition Tage and trade him for a 1st or 2nd round pick this year? Similar to what we did with Peerless Price years ago.I am afraid that he might sign the tag and stay on the Bills. Were it up to me, I would get rid of his lackluster, indifferent ass and gain the comp pick. Not having to tie up and waste 10-15 million on Gilmore is good news too, imo of course.
Saxum Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 I am afraid that he might sign the tag and stay on the Bills. Were it up to me, I would get rid of his lackluster, indifferent ass and gain the comp pick. Not having to tie up and waste 10-15 million on Gilmore is good news too, imo of course. Yes. Replace with a first round pick on a DB, something you will always agree too. I agree about lackluster however and not think he is worth top 10 money.
Chuck Wagon Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 The transition tag is rarely used by NFL franchises. There are two reasons for this. The first is that the one-year transition offer is typically a large amount, which could provide the club with difficulties while attempting to keep the team's aggregate salaries under the salary cap. The other is that players often react badly to receiving the tag, because it limits their ability to negotiate with other teams and therefore hinders their chances of receiving the largest possible contract. Players sometimes counter the tag by holding out or refusing to play for the club, creating distractions and headaches for the club. Copy and pasted directly from wikipedia
Johnny Hammersticks Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 Copy and pasted directly from wikipedia Oh, snap! Caught!!
Pbomb Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 Copy and pasted directly from wikipedia plagarism
Marty McFly Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 and gilmore is not the team player, to say the least.. i would submit he would pout and B word more .. play even less aggressive , if that is possible. jmo Hate to say that I agree here.
Manther Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 IMO we will have another Byrd situation if any tag is placed on Gilmore - he will either refuse to sign it until week 10 or sign it day before opener meaning he does not need to participate in training camp and preseason making him out of sync with new defense scheme no matter how much fellow DBs "keep him informed". I am generally for teams exercising their rights agreed to by the players' representatives, the NFLPA, but in this case cannot see any benefit to Bills. I guess it depends on how much new coaching staff views Gilmore as essential to their plans. That is a ton of speculation and guessing.
1st&ten Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 I think the new coaching staff uses more of a zone coverage scheme so I wouldn't spend too much money on him. It would be nice to get a trade offer but probably won't happen.
Saxum Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 plagiarism It is not "plagiarism" - that is defined as making up spelling when you have no idea how to actually spell words. Plagiarism is copying someone else's work and passing it off as your own which he did not do either since he took no credit; what he did was fail to give credit to source. .... and since wikipedia is an open editing platform it is also possible that he is last editor but it is unlikely in this case. That is a ton of speculation and guessing. Yes but it is my opinion and did not attempt to state otherwise.
GunnerBill Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 I'd sign him to a long term deal. I know I am in the minority but I will be annoyed if they let Gilmore walk. He is so much better than the seeming TBD consensus would have you believe.
Johnny Hammersticks Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 It is not "plagiarism" - that is defined as making up spelling when you have no idea how to actually spell words. Plagiarism is copying someone else's work and passing it off as your own which he did not do either since he took no credit; what he did was fail to give credit to source. .... and since wikipedia is an open editing platform it is also possible that he is last editor but it is unlikely in this case. Ummm....yeah it's plagiarism unless he/she is the one who authored it on Wikipedia. Not that it's a big deal, but technically it is plagiarism. No citation, no link, no credit given.
John from Riverside Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 I'd sign him to a long term deal. I know I am in the minority but I will be annoyed if they let Gilmore walk. He is so much better than the seeming TBD consensus would have you believe. I would like to know his ability in zone coverage as opposed to man If Gilmore is a lousey to average zone coverage guy why spend that money?
C.Biscuit97 Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 I'd sign him to a long term deal. I know I am in the minority but I will be annoyed if they let Gilmore walk. He is so much better than the seeming TBD consensus would have you believe. Agree 100%. If he danced and talked more, he would be viewed differently. He is the whipping boy here this year. Yet some fall in love with average at best guys like Andy Levitre and want to pay him at a far less important position. The Gilmore to Carolina thing almost makes too much sense. He will be someone commentators talk about the dumb Bills letting him walk for nothing.
Mr. WEO Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 I am afraid that he might sign the tag and stay on the Bills. Were it up to me, I would get rid of his lackluster, indifferent ass and gain the comp pick. Not having to tie up and waste 10-15 million on Gilmore is good news too, imo of course. No kidding. Jenner was slapped with the transition tag and he still has his balls. No commitment at all....
jahbonas Posted February 26, 2017 Posted February 26, 2017 Copy and pasted directly from wikipedia Exactly - its about sharing info to get a better understanding .....wtf cares???
Recommended Posts