DC Tom Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 BREAKING. Kellyanne Conway Is Officially the Greatest Monster In History http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2017/02/28/breaking.-kellyanne-conway-officially-greatest-monster-history/ Best comment: Even interns know to treat that office with respect... Monica Lewinsky would never have put her feet on the couch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 As goofy as he looks, the more videos by this guy that I see, the more I like him. When people complain about Trump endorsing or criticizing companies, they don't seem to consider that news media corporations are also just companies, so isn't giving them favored access at press conferences the same thing? Why does the New York Times or CNN or Fox deserve preferential treatment? They don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Kellyann's couch slouch was deemed disrespectful and a stain on the sanctity of the White House, but Dem's protesting/boycotting POTUS' address to Congress will be seen as a brave display of the right to express one's opposition to tyranny. All hail MSNBC and CNN, eh. Sail On, Oh Ship of State. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Kellyann's couch slouch was deemed disrespectful and a stain on the sanctity of the White House, but Dem's protesting/boycotting POTUS' address to Congress will be seen as a brave display of the right to express one's opposition to tyranny. All hail MSNBC and CNN, eh. Sail On, Oh Ship of State. Used to be, decades ago, that the State of the Union wasn't a joint address to Congress, but just a letter sent to them from the President. I actually hope that, next year, Trump just up and says "Fine, if you're going to boycott it, there's no sense in going through the whole circus. I'll just send you a report." Just to watch the left melt down over "He's not addressing Congress! It's unconstitutional! The president's required to address the joint session of Congress we're boycotting!" Of course, it could also be that Waters, et al., are boycotting in hopes that someone blows up the Capitol, and they're the only ones left in government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Were I POTUS I'd wear Maxine's boycott as a badge of honor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Used to be, decades ago, that the State of the Union wasn't a joint address to Congress, but just a letter sent to them from the President. I actually hope that, next year, Trump just up and says "Fine, if you're going to boycott it, there's no sense in going through the whole circus. I'll just send you a report." Just to watch the left melt down over "He's not addressing Congress! It's unconstitutional! The president's required to address the joint session of Congress we're boycotting!" Of course, it could also be that Waters, et al., are boycotting in hopes that someone blows up the Capitol, and they're the only ones left in government. Why bother with a lengthy report. Just replace it with a State of the Union Tweet Teh State of are Union is #merca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 1, 2017 Author Share Posted March 1, 2017 Used to be, decades ago, that the State of the Union wasn't a joint address to Congress, but just a letter sent to them from the President. I actually hope that, next year, Trump just up and says "Fine, if you're going to boycott it, there's no sense in going through the whole circus. I'll just send you a report." Just to watch the left melt down over "He's not addressing Congress! It's unconstitutional! The president's required to address the joint session of Congress we're boycotting!" Of course, it could also be that Waters, et al., are boycotting in hopes that someone blows up the Capitol, and they're the only ones left in government. That's very true and your take on how they would take it is spot on. Thank God he didn't accuse the Dems of being niggardly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 PLEASE NOTE: OUT: Trump's a Russian patsy who will roll over for our enemies. In: The Trump presidency ushers in a new age of militarism. Former President Dronekiller McLibya was unavailable for comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 The wages of fake news This article by Victor Davis Hanson at the Hoover Institution’s “Defining Ideas” Journal offers an excellent compendium of the bogus reporting through which the mainstream media has attempted to take President Trump down. Hanson writes: In just his first month in office, reporters have already peddled dozens of fake news stories designed to discredit the President—to such a degree that little they now write or say can be taken at face value. No, Trump did not have any plans to invade Mexico, as Buzzfeed and the Associated Press alleged. No, Trump’s father did not run for Mayor of New York by peddling racist television ads, as reported by Sidney Blumenthal. No, there were not mass resignations at the State Department in protest of its new leaders, as was reported by the Washington Post. No, Trump’s attorney did not cut a deal with the Russians in Prague. Nor did Trump indulge in sexual escapades in Moscow. Buzzfeed again peddled those fake news stories. No, a supposedly racist Trump did not remove the bust of Martin Luther King Jr. from the White House, as a Time Magazine reporter claimed. No, election results in three states were not altered by hackers or computer criminals to give Trump the election, as implied by New York Magazine. No, Michael Flynn did not tweet that he was a scapegoat. That was a media fantasy endorsed by Nancy Pelosi. Want more? Hanson refers us to Daniel Payne at The Federalist. {snip} In this context, the new president stands to gain much at little cost, at least for now, by treating the media as the nemesis it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 The wages of fake news This article by Victor Davis Hanson at the Hoover Institution’s “Defining Ideas” Journal offers an excellent compendium of the bogus reporting through which the mainstream media has attempted to take President Trump down. Hanson writes: In just his first month in office, reporters have already peddled dozens of fake news stories designed to discredit the President—to such a degree that little they now write or say can be taken at face value. No, Trump did not have any plans to invade Mexico, as Buzzfeed and the Associated Press alleged. No, Trump’s father did not run for Mayor of New York by peddling racist television ads, as reported by Sidney Blumenthal. No, there were not mass resignations at the State Department in protest of its new leaders, as was reported by the Washington Post. No, Trump’s attorney did not cut a deal with the Russians in Prague. Nor did Trump indulge in sexual escapades in Moscow. Buzzfeed again peddled those fake news stories. No, a supposedly racist Trump did not remove the bust of Martin Luther King Jr. from the White House, as a Time Magazine reporter claimed. No, election results in three states were not altered by hackers or computer criminals to give Trump the election, as implied by New York Magazine. No, Michael Flynn did not tweet that he was a scapegoat. That was a media fantasy endorsed by Nancy Pelosi. Want more? Hanson refers us to Daniel Payne at The Federalist. {snip} In this context, the new president stands to gain much at little cost, at least for now, by treating the media as the nemesis it is I'll repeat it for the hoi polloi: when you're fighting Hitler, nothing is unethical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 I'll repeat it for the hoi polloi: when you're fighting Hitler, nothing is unethical. You know who else fought Hitler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 You know who else fought Hitler? The Russians? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 The Russians? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 The Russians? Well it certainly wasn't the French. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 The Russians? They were for him before they were against him. Of course, before that they were against him. The Molotov Pact: the original reset button. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 Well it certainly wasn't the French. Q: Why are there so many tree lined streets and leafy lanes in France? A: Germans like to march in the shade. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Buffalo Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 Afraid so sir.....................when we say that the Left is losing any sense of reality, we mean it. The Washington Post Unveils New Slogan: 'Democracy Dies in Darkness' Mediaite · 4 hours ago LMFAO... The Washington Post: 'Democracy dies in darkness' | TheHill The Hill · 5 hours ago Two more mocks...................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 They were for him before they were against him. Of course, before that they were against him. The Molotov Pact: the original reset button. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/2/press-coverage-of-trump-in-first-month-of-office-8/ Media---88% negative on Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/2/press-coverage-of-trump-in-first-month-of-office-8/ Media---88% negative on Trump. Seems low. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts