Jump to content

The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency


Nanker

Recommended Posts

Liberals are born protestors. It’s in their DNA. It’s what’s always made them liberals. They live and love to fight against injustice...I get it. The problem is that in 21st Century America there’s so little true injustice around that they’ve gotten into some really, really fringe issues. Most people say that they’ve moved too far to the left, but I actually believe it’s all stems from their generationally common desire to protest against The Man. Unfortunately for this generation of liberals, The Man just isn’t all that oppressive anymore.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DANIEL GREENFIELD ON THE PRESS’S FIRST AMENDMENT THEORIES: 

 

The Media Master Race.

 

Bernie Sanders wrapped up his appeal to the media by suggesting a tax on targeted ads to fund “civic-minded media” because, “more than two centuries after the constitution was signed, we cannot sit by and allow corporations, billionaires, and demagogues to destroy the Fourth Estate.”

 

 

The Fourth Estate is a European concept. There’s no room in America for a special status for the media (or any other estates). Sanders ignores what the constitution actually says about the press. The First Amendment prohibits Congress from making laws “abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.”

Freedom of the press doesn’t bestow a special status on the press. It springs from freedom of speech.

 

That is even more obvious in Madison’s original words, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty shall be inviolable.” A free press is an expression of everyone’s right to speak out. It is not a special institution that represents the public interest. It is the actual public.

 

When the Framers wrote of a free press, they meant printers like Benjamin Franklin and his brother, and anyone who wanted to distribute a pamphlet, as well as the small number of larger papers. Their idea of the free press looked a lot like a low-tech internet and had nothing in common with a handful of giant corporate monopolies declaring that they are a journalistic priesthood serving the public interest.

 

Sanders’ proposal for a government-funded “non-profit civic funded media” is even worse. The First Amendment banned government interference with a free press. The socialist politician would like to replace it with a government press that would promote his government takeover of medicine.

 

A government takeover of the media is the opposite of the constitution’s guarantee of a free press.

 

Ever since Trump won, the media has been insisting that it is a unique institution that must be protected from criticism by politicians (CNN and other outlets have claimed that Trump’s criticism of them is a threat to the First Amendment) and from competing speech by rival outlets and ordinary people.

 

Media pressure campaigns on tech monopolies have convinced them to ban a number of conservative outlets and personalities to fight ‘disinformation’, ‘fake news’, and other meaningless terms. The media and its allies set up ‘fact checking’ services that largely ignored their own biases to target conservatives. The purpose of these ‘fact checking’ services isn’t to argue, but to advocate for censoring conservatives.

 

More at the link:

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Bow to China, Gray Lady, bow to China. 

 

 

NYT completely swept under the rug the horror of the murders of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot for a long time until they couldn't hide it any more.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...